| |
Main
Date: 23 Apr 2007 18:33:40
From: Martin R. Howell
Subject: s.a.a. Mugshots
|
Are you there?
Go to: www.theastropost.com
--
Martin R. Howell
Worldwide Amateur Astronomers
|
|
| |
Date: 23 Apr 2007 20:11:38
From: Starlord
Subject: Re: s.a.a. Mugshots
|
Yep.
--
There are those who believe that life here, began out there, far across the
universe, with tribes of humans, who may have been the forefathers of the
Egyptians, or the Toltecs, or the Mayans. Some believe that they may yet be
brothers of man, who even now fight to survive, somewhere beyond the
heavens.
The Lone Sidewalk Astronomer of Rosamond
Telescope Buyers FAQ
http://home.inreach.com/starlord
Sidewalk Astronomy
www.sidewalkastronomy.info
The Church of Eternity
http://home.inreach.com/starlord/church/Eternity.html
AD World
http://www.adworld.netfirms.com/
"Martin R. Howell" <martinhowell@ilikestarsisp.com > wrote in message
news:17rj25ao982ft.2tisxuwk4vbf$.dlg@40tude.net...
>
> Are you there?
>
> Go to: www.theastropost.com
>
>
>
> --
> Martin R. Howell
> Worldwide Amateur Astronomers
|
| | |
Date: 23 Apr 2007 22:38:47
From: Borked Pseudo Mailed
Subject: Re: s.a.a. SPAM shites up your arse
|
shitetard the spammer <starlord@sidewalkastronomy.info > spammed gobshite:
>fawk my up the arse bugger sod shite and gerbils too
>
>
>
>
>"Martin R. Howell" <martinhowell@ilikestarsisp.com> wrote in message
>news:17rj25ao982ft.2tisxuwk4vbf$.dlg@40tude.net...
>>
>> Are you there?
>>
>> Go to: www.theastropost.com
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Martin R. Howell
>> Worldwide Amateur Astronomers
On Fri, 06 Apr 2007, rem642b@yahoo.com (Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t) wrote:
>> From: "Half of a person" <nox-noc...@hotmail.co.uk>
>> i am trying to shut down bork's scam. I think that bork is a twat.
>
>In what sense of the word? Woman's pussy, or beverage served on Trans World
>Airlines?
>
>> Even I have a code of conduct towards my misconduct. Innocent
>> people shouldn't be victimised, however the guilty ones should be
>> shut down because that is how it is meant to be.
>
>Let's start with this "meant to be" crap first. There's no such thing, period.
>
>Now with the rest of your remarks: Suppose somebody knowingly
>obtains his/her living from criminal proceeds. The person
>him/herself doesn't commit crimes, but his/her spouse or friend
>etc. is a criminal. Is the person totally innocent in profiting
>from the crimes, and in fact in encouraging the crimes, maybe even
>demanding the money from the crimes? If the criminal is put in
>prison, the husband/wife/whatever loses his/her source of income.
>How do you feel about that. Would an innocent person thereby
>suffer, so we should never put a criminal in prison under such
>circumstances? Or is the husband/wife/whatever partly guilty too,
>and if he/she loses his/her source of income that's just dandy?
>
>IMO, if a ISP deliberately supports spammers using its facilities,
>that ISP shares part of the guilt of the spammer. And if somebody
>deliberately chooses an ISP that is known to support spammers, that
>person likewise shares part of the guilt of the blackhat ISP and
>indirectly the spammers themselves. So if some ISP is so horribly
>spam-friendly as to deserve blacklisting, there's nothing wrong
>with including all its customers in the blacklist insofar as their
>e-mail comes through blacklisted IPs.
>
>> The day is only day by comparing it to nighttime, but imagine if
>> there was no nighttime, that would be a better world.
>
>You mean like if there were a second Sun equal distance on the
>opposite side of the Earth? If that ever happeed, the oceans would
>boil away rather quickly on a geological time scale, maybe even
>within the span of what would otherwise have been a single human
>lifetime. Do you remember the stories of people who wished for
>really dangerous things that backfired on them, such as anything
>they touch turns to gold, that sort of thing? Wanna retract?
|
|
