| |
Main
Date: 11 Dec 2006 19:09:12
From:
Subject: planetary eyepiece for skyquest xt 4.5
|
Hi everyone, What is the maximum useful magnification for the skyquest(dobsonian) 4.5 inch telescope, for viewing planets and the moon? What is a good quality eyepiece you would recommend? [Would it be useful to buy a wide field eye piece with focal length in the range - 4 to 6 mm?] Thanks, Marvin
|
|
| |
Date: 11 Dec 2006 21:31:39
From: Starlord
Subject: Re: planetary eyepiece for skyquest xt 4.5
|
I've used everything from a 4.8mm to a 17mm on my Stargazer Steve 4.25inch F9 Dob. -- There are those who believe that life here, began out there, far across the universe, with tribes of humans, who may have been the forefathers of the Egyptians, or the Toltechs, or the Mayans. Some believe that they may yet be brothers of man, who even now fight to survive, somewhere beyond the heavens. The Lone Sidewalk Astronomer of Rosamond Telescope Buyers FAQ http://home.inreach.com/starlord Sidewalk Astronomy www.sidewalkastronomy.info The Church of Eternity http://home.inreach.com/starlord/church/Eternity.html <smetalman2006@yahoo.com > wrote in message news:1165892952.860952.239250@16g2000cwy.googlegroups.com... > Hi everyone, > What is the maximum useful magnification for the skyquest(dobsonian) > 4.5 inch telescope, for viewing planets and the moon? > What is a good quality eyepiece you would recommend? > [Would it be useful to buy a wide field eye piece with focal length in > the range - 4 to 6 mm?] > Thanks, > Marvin >
|
| |
Date: 12 Dec 2006 10:48:07
From: W. H. Greer
Subject: Re: planetary eyepiece for skyquest xt 4.5
|
On 11 Dec 2006 19:09:12 -0800, smetalman2006@yahoo.com wrote: >Hi everyone, >What is the maximum useful magnification for the skyquest(dobsonian) >4.5 inch telescope, for viewing planets and the moon? >What is a good quality eyepiece you would recommend? Hi Marvin, It's easier to use wide-field eyepieces for high magnifications with a Dobsonian. The wider field makes it easier to keep the object in the field of view, even if (as is likely) the image quality deteriorates as the object approaches the field edge. The maximum useful magnification depends on the quality of the optics, the accuracy of the scope's collimation, and the seeing conditions (among other things). Some 4.5 inch scopes can handle 250x. Others might top off at 100x or even less! *If* the telescope provides sharp, crisp planetary images with the highest power (10mm) eyepiece it's supplied with, then I would suggest getting a 6mm wide-field eyepiece (about 150x for the 4.5 inch Skyquest). You could later go up a bit higher *if* the image remains sharp and crisp. On the other hand, if planetary images are "fuzzy" with the 10mm eyepiece, then there's little point in purchasing a shorter focal length eyepiece. In a "best case" scenerio, when *everything* is perfect, a high quality 4.5 inch scope would be able to handle a maximum magnification in the neighborhood of 270x. Would *any* 4.5 inch Skyquest qualify at such a magnification? I don't know! In addition to the factors mentioned above, different individuals have different tolerances and preferences concerning maximum useful magnification. There's also the mount to consider. Your maximum useful magnification will not be the same for all objects, nor for the same object on different nights. In the end, it's your job and duty to find the right magnification for each task. In some aspects (such as selecting the right magnification) amateur astronomy is an experimental science. Experiment, Observe, and Enjoy! -- Bill Celestial Journeys http://cejour.blogspot.com
|
| |
Date: 12 Dec 2006 07:12:57
From: John Carruthers
Subject: Re: planetary eyepiece for skyquest xt 4.5
|
smetalman2006@yahoo.com wrote: > Hi everyone, > What is the maximum useful magnification for the skyquest(dobsonian) > 4.5 inch telescope, for viewing planets and the moon? > What is a good quality eyepiece you would recommend? > [Would it be useful to buy a wide field eye piece with focal length in > the range - 4 to 6 mm?] > Thanks, > Marvin Value for money; a 5 or 6mm orthoscopic, not a huge field but sharp. Maybe a Burgess/TMB planetary, wider field,I use a 6mm. Cash no object ? a 5mm monocentric, I want one :-) jc
|
| |
Date: 12 Dec 2006 09:24:10
From: Joe S.
Subject: Re: planetary eyepiece for skyquest xt 4.5
|
<smetalman2006@yahoo.com > wrote in message news:1165892952.860952.239250@16g2000cwy.googlegroups.com... > Hi everyone, > What is the maximum useful magnification for the skyquest(dobsonian) > 4.5 inch telescope, for viewing planets and the moon? > What is a good quality eyepiece you would recommend? > [Would it be useful to buy a wide field eye piece with focal length in > the range - 4 to 6 mm?] > Thanks, > Marvin > And, as if you will not get enough advice, here is another link: http://www.cloudynights.com/item.php?arch=1&cy=2003&cm=4&cmn=April&item_id=145
|
| |
Date: 12 Dec 2006 09:08:11
From: Joe S.
Subject: Re: planetary eyepiece for skyquest xt 4.5
|
<smetalman2006@yahoo.com > wrote in message news:1165892952.860952.239250@16g2000cwy.googlegroups.com... > Hi everyone, > What is the maximum useful magnification for the skyquest(dobsonian) > 4.5 inch telescope, for viewing planets and the moon? > What is a good quality eyepiece you would recommend? > [Would it be useful to buy a wide field eye piece with focal length in > the range - 4 to 6 mm?] > Thanks, > Marvin > Check out this discussion of eyepieces and selecting eyepieces for various scopes. http://observers.org/beginner/eyepieces.freeman.html
|
| |
Date: 12 Dec 2006 08:05:57
From: Joe S.
Subject: Re: planetary eyepiece for skyquest xt 4.5
|
<smetalman2006@yahoo.com > wrote in message news:1165892952.860952.239250@16g2000cwy.googlegroups.com... > Hi everyone, > What is the maximum useful magnification for the skyquest(dobsonian) > 4.5 inch telescope, for viewing planets and the moon? > What is a good quality eyepiece you would recommend? > [Would it be useful to buy a wide field eye piece with focal length in > the range - 4 to 6 mm?] > Thanks, > Marvin > Rule of thumb for maximum magnification is 50 multiplied by the aperture in inches. So, in the case of the 4.5, the result is 4.5 x 50 = 225X -- maximum magnification is 225X. XT-4.5 focal length is 910mm. Magnification is focal length of the scope divided by focal length of the eyepiece. Thus, a 4mm eyepiece would yield: 910 mm divided by 4mm = 227X. A 4mm eyepiece will get you to maximum magnification for this scope. Then there is the consideration for exit pupil size and eye relief, none of which I understand but I'm certain there are lots of wise people here who will tell you about those two aspects. Practically speaking, you are not likely to be happy running the scope up to max magnification because the max mag you can use is really limited by seeing conditions -- atmospheric conditions, light pollution, and the like. A 5mm eyepiece will give you 182X, which will show you a lot of planetary detail while staying below max mag. I have an XT-12, 1500mm focal length, theoretical max mag is 600X. For planets, I use a 7mm Nagler (214X), a 10mm Radian (150X), and a 5mm University Optics orthoscopic (300X). Most nights, the 7mm at 214X is the best I can do what with light pollution and atmospherics. Occasionally I can use a 3.7mm Orion ED eypiece at 405X, but those nights are rare. Another factor is movement and field of view. As mag goes up, FOV becomes smaller. At 300X in my scope, a planet (or any other object for that matter) moves across the FOV rather quickly and I find myself spending more time moving the scope than observing. A lot of folks prefer orthoscopic eyepieces for planetery work because they have fewer glass elements to interfere with the light path, thereby supposedly revealing more planetary detail. You might look at University Optics orthos -- good eyepieces, modest prices -- but orthos have very little eye relief. Here is a discussion of eyepieces that uses only TeleVue eyepieces: http://www.analyticalsci.com/Astronomy/Telescopes/imagestv/selecting_an_eyepiece_set.htm Another option is to get yourself a good 2X Barlow. I see in the Orion catalog that the XT-4.5 came with two eyepieces that yield 36X and 91X. With a 2X Barlow, you'll now have 36X, 72X, 91X, and 182X. Try that, see what 182X does for you -- then, you would have an idea of what higher mags look like and you can decide if you want another eyepiece or just stick with the existing eyepieces and the Barlow.
|
| |
Date: 12 Dec 2006 17:09:45
From: Dennis Woos
Subject: Re: planetary eyepiece for skyquest xt 4.5
|
<smetalman2006@yahoo.com > wrote in message news:1165892952.860952.239250@16g2000cwy.googlegroups.com... > Hi everyone, > What is the maximum useful magnification for the skyquest(dobsonian) > 4.5 inch telescope, for viewing planets and the moon? > What is a good quality eyepiece you would recommend? > [Would it be useful to buy a wide field eye piece with focal length in > the range - 4 to 6 mm?] > Thanks, > Marvin > The best thing you can do is to connect with the folks in your local astro club, and attend events where you will be able to test out more eyepieces than you can shake a stick at. That said, I really like our 6mm Burgess Planetary garage-sale eyepiece - $50. Don't think that spending a lot of money is going to make a very big difference in your views - it won't. What big money buys you over a good Plossl is wide-field and eye-relief, and the Burgess gives you both of these benefits at a Plossl price. Only you can decide if your scope and seeing conditions make a 6mm worth-while. Dennis
|
|