| |
Main
Date: 06 Dec 2006 02:17:57
From: tontoko
Subject: Unmasked Prometheus
|
In the following URL;
http://www.unmannedspaceflight.com/uploads/post-531-1130252554.jpg
the left side is the original image of Prometheus and the right
side is the processed image deconvoluted by Focus Corrector.
For detail of Focus Corrector, visit;
http://139.134.5.123/tiddler2/c22508/focus.htm
|
|
| |
Date: 06 Dec 2006 04:37:35
From: RMOLLISE
Subject: Re: Unmasked Prometheus
|
Hi:
The program looks pretty impressive...but...what will it do for me for
50 bucks that the free Registax 4 with its amazing wavelets won't do?
tontoko wrote:
> In the following URL;
>
> http://www.unmannedspaceflight.com/uploads/post-531-1130252554.jpg
>
> the left side is the original image of Prometheus and the right
> side is the processed image deconvoluted by Focus Corrector.
>
> For detail of Focus Corrector, visit;
>
> http://139.134.5.123/tiddler2/c22508/focus.htm
|
| |
Date: 06 Dec 2006 10:57:42
From: AustinMN
Subject: Re: Unmasked Prometheus
|
RMOLLISE wrote:
> Hi:
>
> The program looks pretty impressive...but...what will it do for me for
> 50 bucks that the free Registax 4 with its amazing wavelets won't do?
>
For 50 bucks, it will spam newsgroups. No need to do that with
freeware.
Austin
|
| |
Date: 07 Dec 2006 08:41:45
From: RMOLLISE
Subject: Re: Unmasked Prometheus
|
Hi:
One thing, next time you want to post something about your program, how
about putting "Ann:" in the subject line? That tells us you are SELLING
SOMETHING. OK?
It wouldn't be difficult to compare _results_, BTW.
tontoko wrote:
> I didn't know that software. I'll check it. By the way, my software
> doesn't use any integral transform such as Fourier or wavelet
> transform. Therefore I think it might be difficult to compare the
> method used in Registax with that in my software.
>
> RMOLLISE wrote:
> > Hi:
> >
> > The program looks pretty impressive...but...what will it do for me for
> > 50 bucks that the free Registax 4 with its amazing wavelets won't do?
> >
> >
> > tontoko wrote:
> > > In the following URL;
> > >
> > > http://www.unmannedspaceflight.com/uploads/post-531-1130252554.jpg
> > >
> > > the left side is the original image of Prometheus and the right
> > > side is the processed image deconvoluted by Focus Corrector.
> > >
> > > For detail of Focus Corrector, visit;
> > >
> > > http://139.134.5.123/tiddler2/c22508/focus.htm
|
| |
Date: 07 Dec 2006 03:41:38
From: tontoko
Subject: Re: Unmasked Prometheus
|
I didn't know that software. I'll check it. By the way, my software
doesn't use any integral transform such as Fourier or wavelet
transform. Therefore I think it might be difficult to compare the
method used in Registax with that in my software.
RMOLLISE wrote:
> Hi:
>
> The program looks pretty impressive...but...what will it do for me for
> 50 bucks that the free Registax 4 with its amazing wavelets won't do?
>
>
> tontoko wrote:
> > In the following URL;
> >
> > http://www.unmannedspaceflight.com/uploads/post-531-1130252554.jpg
> >
> > the left side is the original image of Prometheus and the right
> > side is the processed image deconvoluted by Focus Corrector.
> >
> > For detail of Focus Corrector, visit;
> >
> > http://139.134.5.123/tiddler2/c22508/focus.htm
|
| |
Date: 08 Dec 2006 05:16:50
From: tontoko
Subject: Ann: Re: Unmasked Prometheus
|
> It wouldn't be difficult to compare _results_, BTW.
Surely it is possible to compare the results from Registax and Focus
Corrector based on the same original image (apart form the difference
of purposes - de-noise / re-focus).
I'll ask some Registax users to allow me to publish the comparison
results. If I got their permission, I'll show you them.
RMOLLISE wrote:
> Hi:
>
> One thing, next time you want to post something about your program, how
> about putting "Ann:" in the subject line? That tells us you are SELLING
> SOMETHING. OK?
>
> It wouldn't be difficult to compare _results_, BTW.
>
>
> tontoko wrote:
> > I didn't know that software. I'll check it. By the way, my software
> > doesn't use any integral transform such as Fourier or wavelet
> > transform. Therefore I think it might be difficult to compare the
> > method used in Registax with that in my software.
> >
> > RMOLLISE wrote:
> > > Hi:
> > >
> > > The program looks pretty impressive...but...what will it do for me for
> > > 50 bucks that the free Registax 4 with its amazing wavelets won't do?
> > >
> > >
> > > tontoko wrote:
> > > > In the following URL;
> > > >
> > > > http://www.unmannedspaceflight.com/uploads/post-531-1130252554.jpg
> > > >
> > > > the left side is the original image of Prometheus and the right
> > > > side is the processed image deconvoluted by Focus Corrector.
> > > >
> > > > For detail of Focus Corrector, visit;
> > > >
> > > > http://139.134.5.123/tiddler2/c22508/focus.htm
|
|
