On 101st Birthday of Einstein's E=mc2

astronomy-chat.net
Promoting astronomy discussion.

Main

Date: 27 Sep 2006 07:24:12
From: AJAY SHARMA
Subject: On 101st Birthday of Einstein's E=mc2

When light energy is emitted, Mass increases,: Einstein=E2=80=99s Sep.1905
derivation.
It is not consistent prediction from Einstein=E2=80=99s Sep 1905
derivation.
(written in response to comments)
How eq.(13) at page 201 in my paper I incorrect ? Then what is
correct equation?
In fact Eq.(13) in paper at page 201 is correct absolutely.

=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9DEq.(13) is based of Einstein=E2=80=99s=
Sep 1905 derivation ,
that THEORETICALLY when body emits Light Energy , the mass of body
INCREASE in some cases.=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=
=9D=E2=80=9D
It is explained below in THREE SECTIONS.
Section A.
(i) Einstein has considered A body of mass 10gm (say), it emits two
waves under special conditions (two waves of equal energy L/2 each ,
emitted in opposite directions w.r.t measuring system) . Obviously
mass decreases, which is converted to light energy and Einstein=E2=80=98s
equation is
L =3Ddmc2
Energy emitted =3D decrease in mass .c2 (1)
(ii) If we consider the same body , it emits light energy at angle 90
w=2Er.t to the moving system , then again Einstein=E2=80=99s derivation gi=
ves
L =3Dmc2
Energy emitted =3D decrease in mass .c2 (2)
Both the cases are correct . Eq.(2) is not derived by Einstein.

Einstein=E2=80=99s 27 Sep 1905 paper available at
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/

(iii) If we consider the same body , it emits light energy at angle
90 o w.r.t to the moving system , then again Einstein=E2=80=99s derivation
gives

Ho =3D H1 + =CE=B2 L( 1 =E2=80=93 v/c cos89 o)
Ho =3D H1 + =CE=B2 L (1=E2=80=93 0.017452406 v/c)
Now proceeding as in Eq.(5) to Eq.(10) we get
=CE=94 m =3D =E2=80=93 0.03490L/cv + L/c2 (1=
3) at
page 201 of paper
Thus Einstein=E2=80=99s derivation implies that when body emits light energy
at angle 89 o then its MASS must INCREASE. If this angle is 0 then
Einstein=E2=80=99s derivation implies that when Light Energy is emitted ,
mass decreases.

Sharma June 2004 paper is available
http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf
For further elaborated discussion link is

https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=3D23_48_324&p=
roducts_id=3D4554

Thus Einstein=E2=80=99s derivation is not true in general, it holds good
under special conditions only.
I have given 2nd and 3rd example purposely that up to which extent
Einstein=E2=80=99s derivation depends upon angle. Angle up to 90 o is OK in
Einstein=E2=80=99s derivation of Sep 1905. If it slightly decreases (even
89.9 o ) then, then RESULTS ARE CONTRADICTORY to results.

Section B
It is crystal clear that as Einstein=E2=80=99s derivation as applicable to
first example ( two waves of equal energy L/2 each , emitted in
opposite directions w.r.t measuring system) and second example ( a
single wave of energy L emitted at 89 o or 89.5 o w.r.t measuring
system ).Thus Einstein=E2=80=99s derivation is also applicable to third
example (a single wave of energy L emitted at 89 o or 89.5 o w.r.t
measuring system).

As results are inconsistent then it is due to LIMITATIONS of
Einstein=E2=80=99s derivation only, as it is equally applicable in all the
three cases.
It is explained below that
law of =E2=80=98conservation of momentum=E2=80=99 holds good and =E2=80=98c=
onditions of
applicability=E2=80=99 of Einstein=E2=80=99s derivation are applicable to A=
LL THREE
CASES.

Part I
(a) Law of conservation of momentum is obeyed completely.
Conservation of momentum is meant for isolated system and
mathematically implies that
Initial Momentum =3D Final Momentum (3)
mu=3Dmv
As mass remains same in classical mechanics.
So u=3Dv
which is Newton=E2=80=99s First law of motion
It is used to calculate the velocity of recoil of body after emission
of energy in any way.

--It is applicable if body moves or remains at rest after emitting
energy.
Einstein has done the case when body remain at rest ONLY, I have
extended to it even if MOVES.
Take example of
-----Shot fired from gun, gun moves backward.
------ Light bullet fired from TOY Gun, system remains at rest.
Momentum is conserved in ALL THREE CASES and velocity of recoil is more
or less can be calculated using Law of conservation of momentum. This
is the use of law of conservation of linear momentum in this case.
As Einstein did all CALCULATION UNDER CLASSICAL CONDITIONS, hence net
REALTIVE velocity of body after recoil must be in classical region.
Again as Einstein did calculation under CLASSICAL CONDITIONS then
momentum variation has no effect on MASS.

Part II
Einstein=E2=80=99s derivation is applicable when body remains at REST or
MOVES.
The basis for this TRUTH lies in Einstein=E2=80=99s derivation. Purposely a=
nd
Especially eq.(1) shown below which is applicable for one or n waves.
(i) The central equation in Einstein=E2=80=98s equation is

l* =3D l{1 =E2=80=93 v/c cos =CF=86 } /=E2=88=9A[1 =E2=80=93 v2 /c2] =
(1) at page
196 of the paper.

This equation is from Einstein=E2=80=99s June 1905 paper AND Einstein used =
it
in derivation of L =3Dmc2.
With this equation magnitude of light energy is measured when one there
is relative velocity between light emitting body and measuring system.
Einstein considered two frames i.e. (x,y,z) at rest
(body placed in it) and second frame (X,Y,Z) moving with velocity v (
measuring system) .
Let body moves with velocity v=E2=80=99, then relative velocity will be
v+v=E2=80=99 and eq.(1) becomes

l* =3D l{1 =E2=80=93 (v+v=E2=80=99) /c cos =CF=86 } /=E2=88=9A[1 =E2=80=93=
(v+v=E2=80=99)2 /c2] (4)

So after emission of light energy, body remains at REST or MOVES,
eq.(1) [ at page 196 of paper ] is applicable.
When ever under any condition, body emits light energy, EINSTEIN=E2=80=99S
Sep. 1905 must give that MASS MUST DECREASE.

Thus out of three cases first one (two waves) , second one (for one
wave) interpretation for Einstein derivation is correct. How it
becomes incorrect for third case (one wave, with angle difference of 1
or less) becomes incorrect.
It is limitation of Einstein=E2=80=99s derivation.
Thus Einstein=E2=80=99s Sep 1905 derivation is correct UNDER SPECIAL
CONDITIONS not in GENERAL.

Explanation for eq.(16) in paper at page 202.
Consider two waves of energy 0.5001L
and 0.4999L , then apply law of conservation of momentum the velocity
of RECOIL can be calculated as
Vr =3D 1/10000000000000000000000000000000 =3D 10-^32 m/s.
Now v+v=E2=80=99 =3D v +10-^32
So eq.(1) is valid whether body is at REST or MOVES after emission
of light energy.
Einstein=E2=80=99s derivation of L =3Dmc2, the body may remain at REST or
MOVE, is applicable there is no rule of science which stops it.

Section 3
Part I
Thus it is concluded that Einstein=E2=80=99s derivation has four variables
(i) Number of light waves
(ii) Magnitude of energy of light waves
(iii) Angle at which light energy is emitted
(iv) Relative velocity v ( must be in classical region).

All these variables in Einstein=E2=80=99s Sep 1905 derivation have numerous
values. Energy may be emitted in any way, the mass of BODY DECREASES
experimentally ALWAYS.

But THEORETICALLY according to Einstein=E2=80=99s 29 Sep. 1905
derivation, in every time, result is not eq.(1) .
L =3Dmc2
Energy emitted =3D decrease in mass .c2 (1)
Einstein=E2=80=99s Sep. 1905 derivation also predicts MATHEMATICALLY that
when body emits Light Energy its mass must also INCREASE. It is not
true.
Hence Einstein=E2=80=99s derivation is true under special conditions only.

Part II

In addition after deriving
L=3D dmc2 (1)
Einstein simply replaced L and SPECULATED ( not derived)
E=3Ddmc2
where E is EVERY FORM OF ENERGY ( light energy, heat energy, sound
energy, chemical energy in form invisible radiation etc.). However
basis for derivation of eq.(1) is only for light energy eq.(1) at page
196 of my paper.

Thus we need to derive mass energy equation by other method and
generalized equation is
dE =3DAc2 dm
where A is coefficient of proportionality, like others in the existing
physics and its value depend upon experimental conditions.
For details
https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=3D23_48_324&p=
roducts_id=3D4554

References of Einstein=E2=80=99s work
.
A=2EEinstein, Annalen der Physik 18 (1905) 639-641.
. DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND
UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT?
Weblink is
Einstein=E2=80=99s 27 Sep 1905 paper available at
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/

PartII
References of Ajay Sharma=E2=80=99s work

My work is available at
A=2E Sharma, Physics Essays, 17 (2004) 195-222.
=E2=80=9DThe Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation =EF=81=84E =3D Ac2 =
=EF=81=84M; and
its applications in General physics and Cosmology=E2=80=9D.
http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf
For details
https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=3D23_48_324&p=
roducts_id=3D4554

International Conferences
It has been accepted for presentation over 55 conferences all over the
world
--------------------------------------few of them
1=2E Sharma, A. presented in 19th International Conference on the
Applications of Accelerators in Research and Industry , 20-25
August , 2006 Fort Worth Texas, USA

2. A. Sharma, Abstract Book 38th European Group of Atomic Systems
(
Euro physics Conference) Isachia (Naples) Italy (2006) 53.

3=2E A. Sharma , Abstract Book , A Century After Einstein Physics 2005 ,

10-14 April 2005 ( Organizer Institute of Physics , Bristol )
University of Warwick , ENGLAND

4=2E A. Sharma presented in 5th British gravity Conference , OXFORD
ENGLAND

5=2E A. Sharma,. Proc. Int. Conf. on Computational Methods in
Sciences and Engineering 2003 World Scientific Co. USA ,
(2003) 585.

6=2E A. Sharma, Proc. Int. Conf. on Number, Time, Relativity United
Physical Society of Russian Federation, Moscow , (2004) 81
plus more
--------------------------------------
Journals
This paper
=E2=80=9DThe Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation =EF=81=84E =3D Ac2 =
=EF=81=84M; and
its applications in General physics and Cosmology=E2=80=9D.
is published in journal
Physics Essays , CANADA
www.physicsessays.com
The paper
The past ,present and future of E=3Dmc2
will be published in 2007 Galilean Electrodynamics, Massachusetts,
USA.
In parts it is published in various others journals.
----------------------
Book 100 Years of E=3Dmc2
For details
https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=3D23_48_324&p=
roducts_id=3D4554

Date: 27 Sep 2006 11:40:03
From:
Subject: Re: On 101st Birthday of Einstein's E=mc2

AJAY SHARMA wrote:
<snip out the drool and meaningless references to unpublished
material >

When you have a list of peer-reviewed papers in major physics journals,
come back and talk to us. In the mean time selfpublished books and
conferences that accept ANY submittal have NO MEANING

Date: 28 Sep 2006 05:26:15
From: AJAY SHARMA
Subject: Re: On 101st Birthday of Einstein's E=mc2

Mileva Maric' wrote:
> AJAY SHARMA wrote:
>
> > When light energy is emitted, Mass increases,: Einstein=E2=80=99s Sep.1=
905
> > derivation.
> > It is not consistent prediction from Einstein=E2=80=99s Sep 1905
> > derivation.
> > (written in response to comments)
> > How eq.(13) at page 201 in my paper I incorrect ? Then what is
> > correct equation?
> > In fact Eq.(13) in paper at page 201 is correct absolutely.
> >
> > =E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9DEq.(13) is based of Einstein=E2=80=
=99s Sep 1905 derivation ,
> > that THEORETICALLY when body emits Light Energy , the mass of body
> > INCREASE in some cases.=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D=
=E2=80=9D=E2=80=9D
> > It is explained below in THREE SECTIONS.
> > Section A.
> > (i) Einstein has considered A body of mass 10gm (say), it emits two
> > waves under special conditions (two waves of equal energy L/2 each ,
> > emitted in opposite directions w.r.t measuring system) . Obviously
> > mass decreases, which is converted to light energy and Einstein=E2=80=
=98s
> > equation is
> > L =3Ddmc2
> > Energy emitted =3D decrease in mass .c2 (1)
> > (ii) If we consider the same body , it emits light energy at angle 90
> > w.r.t to the moving system , then again Einstein=E2=80=99s derivation =
gives
> > L =3Dmc2
> > Energy emitted =3D decrease in mass .c2 (2)
> > Both the cases are correct . Eq.(2) is not derived by Einstein.
> >
> > Einstein=E2=80=99s 27 Sep 1905 paper available at
> > http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/
> >
> > (iii) If we consider the same body , it emits light energy at angle
> > 90 o w.r.t to the moving system , then again Einstein=E2=80=99s deriva=
tion
> > gives
> >
> > Ho =3D H1 + =CE=B2 L( 1 =E2=80=93 v/c cos89 o)
> > Ho =3D H1 + =CE=B2 L (1=E2=80=93 0.017452406 v/c)
> > Now proceeding as in Eq.(5) to Eq.(10) we get
> > =CE=94 m =3D =E2=80=93 0.03490L/cv + L/c2 =
(13) at
> > page 201 of paper
> > Thus Einstein=E2=80=99s derivation implies that when body emits light e=
nergy
> > at angle 89 o then its MASS must INCREASE. If this angle is 0 then
> > Einstein=E2=80=99s derivation implies that when Light Energy is emitte=
d ,
> > mass decreases.
> >
> > Sharma June 2004 paper is available
> > http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf
> > For further elaborated discussion link is
> >
> > https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=3D23_48_3=
24&products_id=3D4554
> >
> > Thus Einstein=E2=80=99s derivation is not true in general, it holds good
> > under special conditions only.
> > I have given 2nd and 3rd example purposely that up to which extent
> > Einstein=E2=80=99s derivation depends upon angle. Angle up to 90 o is =
OK in
> > Einstein=E2=80=99s derivation of Sep 1905. If it slightly decreases (ev=
en
> > 89.9 o ) then, then RESULTS ARE CONTRADICTORY to results.
> >
> > Section B
> > It is crystal clear that as Einstein=E2=80=99s derivation as applicab=
le to
> > first example ( two waves of equal energy L/2 each , emitted in
> > opposite directions w.r.t measuring system) and second example ( a
> > single wave of energy L emitted at 89 o or 89.5 o w.r.t measuring
> > system ).Thus Einstein=E2=80=99s derivation is also applicable to th=
ird
> > example (a single wave of energy L emitted at 89 o or 89.5 o w.r.t
> > measuring system).
> >
> > As results are inconsistent then it is due to LIMITATIONS of
> > Einstein=E2=80=99s derivation only, as it is equally applicable in all =
the
> > three cases.
> > It is explained below that
> > law of =E2=80=98conservation of momentum=E2=80=99 holds good and =E2=80=
=98conditions of
> > applicability=E2=80=99 of Einstein=E2=80=99s derivation are applicable =
to ALL THREE
> > CASES.
> >
> > Part I
> > (a) Law of conservation of momentum is obeyed completely.
> > Conservation of momentum is meant for isolated system and
> > mathematically implies that
> > Initial Momentum =3D Final Momentum (3)
> > mu=3Dmv
> > As mass remains same in classical mechanics.
> > So u=3Dv
> > which is Newton=E2=80=99s First law of motion
> > It is used to calculate the velocity of recoil of body after emission
> > of energy in any way.
> >
> > --It is applicable if body moves or remains at rest after emitting
> > energy.
> > Einstein has done the case when body remain at rest ONLY, I have
> > extended to it even if MOVES.
> > Take example of
> > -----Shot fired from gun, gun moves backward.
> > ------ Light bullet fired from TOY Gun, system remains at rest.
> > Momentum is conserved in ALL THREE CASES and velocity of recoil is more
> > or less can be calculated using Law of conservation of momentum. This
> > is the use of law of conservation of linear momentum in this case.
> > As Einstein did all CALCULATION UNDER CLASSICAL CONDITIONS, hence net
> > REALTIVE velocity of body after recoil must be in classical region.
> > Again as Einstein did calculation under CLASSICAL CONDITIONS then
> > momentum variation has no effect on MASS.
> >
> > Part II
> > Einstein=E2=80=99s derivation is applicable when body remains at REST =
or
> > MOVES.
> > The basis for this TRUTH lies in Einstein=E2=80=99s derivation. Purpose=
ly and
> > Especially eq.(1) shown below which is applicable for one or n waves.
> > (i) The central equation in Einstein=E2=80=98s equation is
> >
> > l* =3D l{1 =E2=80=93 v/c cos =CF=86 } /=E2=88=9A[1 =E2=80=93 v2 /c2] =
(1) at page
> > 196 of the paper.
> >
> > This equation is from Einstein=E2=80=99s June 1905 paper AND Einstein u=
sed it
> > in derivation of L =3Dmc2.
> > With this equation magnitude of light energy is measured when one there
> > is relative velocity between light emitting body and measuring system.
> > Einstein considered two frames i.e. (x,y,z) at rest
> > (body placed in it) and second frame (X,Y,Z) moving with velocity v (
> > measuring system) .
> > Let body moves with velocity v=E2=80=99, then relative velocity will be
> > v+v=E2=80=99 and eq.(1) becomes
> >
> > l* =3D l{1 =E2=80=93 (v+v=E2=80=99) /c cos =CF=86 } /=E2=88=9A[1 =E2=
=80=93 (v+v=E2=80=99)2 /c2] (4)
> >
> > So after emission of light energy, body remains at REST or MOVES,
> > eq.(1) [ at page 196 of paper ] is applicable.
> > When ever under any condition, body emits light energy, EINSTEIN=E2=80=
=99S
> > Sep. 1905 must give that MASS MUST DECREASE.
> >
> > Thus out of three cases first one (two waves) , second one (for one
> > wave) interpretation for Einstein derivation is correct. How it
> > becomes incorrect for third case (one wave, with angle difference of 1
> > or less) becomes incorrect.
> > It is limitation of Einstein=E2=80=99s derivation.
> > Thus Einstein=E2=80=99s Sep 1905 derivation is correct UNDER SPECIAL
> > CONDITIONS not in GENERAL.
> >
> > Explanation for eq.(16) in paper at page 202.
> > Consider two waves of energy 0.5001L
> > and 0.4999L , then apply law of conservation of momentum the velocity
> > of RECOIL can be calculated as
> > Vr =3D 1/10000000000000000000000000000000 =3D 10-^32 m/s.
> > Now v+v=E2=80=99 =3D v +10-^32
> > So eq.(1) is valid whether body is at REST or MOVES after emission
> > of light energy.
> > Einstein=E2=80=99s derivation of L =3Dmc2, the body may remain at REST=
or
> > MOVE, is applicable there is no rule of science which stops it.
> >
> > Section 3
> > Part I
> > Thus it is concluded that Einstein=E2=80=99s derivation has four variab=
les
> > (i) Number of light waves
> > (ii) Magnitude of energy of light waves
> > (iii) Angle at which light energy is emitted
> > (iv) Relative velocity v ( must be in classical region).
> >
> > All these variables in Einstein=E2=80=99s Sep 1905 derivation have nume=
rous
> > values. Energy may be emitted in any way, the mass of BODY DECREASES
> > experimentally ALWAYS.
> >
> > But THEORETICALLY according to Einstein=E2=80=99s 29 Sep. 1905
> > derivation, in every time, result is not eq.(1) .
> > L =3Dmc2
> > Energy emitted =3D decrease in mass .c2 (1)
> > Einstein=E2=80=99s Sep. 1905 derivation also predicts MATHEMATICALLY th=
at
> > when body emits Light Energy its mass must also INCREASE. It is not
> > true.
> > Hence Einstein=E2=80=99s derivation is true under special conditions on=
ly.
> >
> > Part II
> >
> > In addition after deriving
> > L=3D dmc2 (1)
> > Einstein simply replaced L and SPECULATED ( not derived)
> > E=3Ddmc2
> > where E is EVERY FORM OF ENERGY ( light energy, heat energy, sound
> > energy, chemical energy in form invisible radiation etc.). However
> > basis for derivation of eq.(1) is only for light energy eq.(1) at page
> > 196 of my paper.
> >
> > Thus we need to derive mass energy equation by other method and
> > generalized equation is
> > dE =3DAc2 dm
> > where A is coefficient of proportionality, like others in the existing
> > physics and its value depend upon experimental conditions.
> > For details
> > https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=3D23_48_3=
24&products_id=3D4554
> >
> > References of Einstein=E2=80=99s work
> > .
> > A.Einstein, Annalen der Physik 18 (1905) 639-641.
> > . DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND
> > UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT?
> > Weblink is
> > Einstein=E2=80=99s 27 Sep 1905 paper available at
> > http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/
> >
> > PartII
> > References of Ajay Sharma=E2=80=99s work
> >
> > My work is available at
> > A. Sharma, Physics Essays, 17 (2004) 195-222.
> > =E2=80=9DThe Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation =EF=81=84E =3D =
Ac2 =EF=81=84M; and
> > its applications in General physics and Cosmology=E2=80=9D.
> > http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf
> > For details
> > https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=3D23_48_3=
24&products_id=3D4554
> >
> > International Conferences
> > It has been accepted for presentation over 55 conferences all over the
> > world
> > --------------------------------------few of them
> > 1. Sharma, A. presented in 19th International Conference on the
> > Applications of Accelerators in Research and Industry , 20-25
> > August , 2006 Fort Worth Texas, USA
> >
> > 2. A. Sharma, Abstract Book 38th European Group of Atomic Systems
> > (
> > Euro physics Conference) Isachia (Naples) Italy (2006) 53.
> >
> > 3. A. Sharma , Abstract Book , A Century After Einstein Physics 2005 ,
> >
> > 10-14 April 2005 ( Organizer Institute of Physics , Bristol )
> > University of Warwick , ENGLAND
> >
> > 4. A. Sharma presented in 5th British gravity Conference , OXFORD
> > ENGLAND
> >
> > 5. A. Sharma,. Proc. Int. Conf. on Computational Methods in
> > Sciences and Engineering 2003 World Scientific Co. USA ,
> > (2003) 585.
> >
> > 6. A. Sharma, Proc. Int. Conf. on Number, Time, Relativity United
> > Physical Society of Russian Federation, Moscow , (2004) 81
> > plus more
> > --------------------------------------
> > Journals
> > This paper
> > =E2=80=9DThe Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation =EF=81=84E =3D =
Ac2 =EF=81=84M; and
> > its applications in General physics and Cosmology=E2=80=9D.
> > is published in journal
> > Physics Essays , CANADA
> > www.physicsessays.com
> > The paper
> > The past ,present and future of E=3Dmc2
> > will be published in 2007 Galilean Electrodynamics, Massachusetts,
> > USA.
> > In parts it is published in various others journals.
> > ----------------------
> > Book 100 Years of E=3Dmc2
> > For details
> > https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=3D23_48_3=
24&products_id=3D4554
>
> Butch yous misunderstand di whole ting! Johnny undt I werked on dis vey
> hard. Please consider leaving us alone!
> Mileva Maric'
>
> Johnny is here and would say werd but tells me tell you
> t________________________________________________________________________=
______________________o
>
> --------------E36053B9994D2CC3E5F47F48
> Content-Type: text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> X-Google-AttachSize: 17419
>
> <!dype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
> <html>
>
> AJAY SHARMA wrote:
> <blockquote TYPE=3DCITE>When light energy is emitted, Mass increases,: Ei=
nsteinâ€?s
> Sep.1905
> derivation.
> It is not consistent prediction from Einsteinâ&eur=
o;?s
> Sep 1905
> derivation.
> &nb=
sp; =

> (written in response to comments)
> How eq.(13) at page 201 in my paper I incorr=
ect
> ? Then what is
> correct equation?
> In fact Eq.(13) in paper at page 201 is correct absolutely.
> â€?â€?â€?â€?Eq.(13)
> is based of Einsteinâ€?s Sep 1905 derivation ,
> that THEORETICALLY when body emits Light Energy , the mass of
> body
> INCREASE in some cases.â€?â€?â&euro=
;?â€?â€?â€?â€?
> It is explained below in THREE SECTIONS.
> &nb=
sp; =

> Section A.
> (i) Einstein has considered A body of mass 10gm (say), it emits two
> waves under special conditions (two waves of equal energy L/2 each
> ,
> emitted in opposite directions w.r.t measuring system)
> . Obviously
> mass decreases, which is converted to light energy and Einsteinâ=
;€?s
> equation is
> L =3Ddmc2
> Energy emitted =3D decrease in mass .c2 =

> (1)
> (ii) If we consider the same body , it emits light energy
> at angle 90
> w.r.t to the moving system , then again Einsteinâ€?s
> derivation gives
> L =3Dmc2
> Energy emitted =3D decrease in mass .c2 =

> (2)
> Both the cases are correct . Eq.(2) is not derived by Einstein.
> Einsteinâ€?s 27 Sep 1905 paper available at
> <a href=3D"http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/">http:/=
/www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/</a >
> (iii) If we consider the same body , it emits light energy
> at angle
> 90 o w.r.t to the moving system , then again Einsteinâ&eu=
ro;?s
> derivation
> gives
> Ho =3D H1 + Î² L( 1 â€? v/c cos89 o)
> Ho =3D H1 + Î² L (1â€? 0.017452406
> v/c)
> Now proceeding as in Eq.(5) to Eq.(10) we get
> Î? m =3D â€?&nb=
sp;
> 0.03490L/cv + L/c2 &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p;
> (13) at
> page 201 of paper
> Thus Einsteinâ€?s derivation implies that when body emits
> light energy
> at angle 89 o then its MASS must INCREASE. If this angle is 0 then
> Einsteinâ€?s derivation implies that when Light Ener=
gy
> is emitted ,
> mass decreases.
> Sharma June 2004 paper is available
> <a href=3D"http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf">h=
ttp://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf</a >
> For further elaborated discussion link is
> <a href=3D"https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPa=
th=3D23_48_324&products_id=3D4554" >https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/p=
roduct_info.php?cPath=3D23_48_324&products_id=3D4554</a >
> Thus Einsteinâ€?s derivation is not true in general, it hol=
ds
> good
> under special conditions only.
> I have given 2nd and 3rd example purposely that up to which extent
> Einsteinâ€?s derivation depends upon angle. Angle
> up to 90 o is OK in
> Einsteinâ€?s derivation of Sep 1905. If it slightly decrea=
ses
> (even
> 89.9 o ) then, then RESULTS ARE CONTRADICTORY to results.
> &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp;
> Section B
> It is crystal clear that as Einsteinâ€?s deriv=
ation
> as applicable to
> first example ( two waves of equal energy L/2 each
> , emitted in
> opposite directions w.r.t measuring system) and second
> example ( a
> single wave of energy L emitted at 89 o or 89.5 o w.r.t&n=
bsp;
> measuring
> system ).Thus Einsteinâ€?s derivation is also
> applicable to third
> example (a single wave of energy L emitted at 89 o or 89.5
> o w.r.t
> measuring system).
> As results are inconsistent then it is due to LIMITATIONS of
> Einsteinâ€?s derivation only, as it is equally applicable
> in all the
> three cases.
> &nb=
sp; =
 &nb=
sp;
> It is explained below that
> law of â€?conservation of momentumâ€? holds good
> and â€?conditions of
> applicabilityâ€? of Einsteinâ€?s derivation are
> applicable to ALL THREE
> CASES.
> &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p;
> Part I
> (a) Law of conservation of momentum is obeyed
> completely.
> Conservation of momentum is meant for isolated system and
> mathematically implies that
> Initial Momentum =3D Final
> Momentum (3)
> &nb=
sp;
> mu=3Dmv
> As mass remains same in classical mechanics.
> So u=3Dv
> which is Newtonâ€?s First law of motion
> It is used to calculate the velocity of recoil of body after emission
> of energy in any way.
> --It is applicable if body moves or remains at rest after emitting
> energy.
> Einstein has done the case when body remain at rest ONLY, I have
> extended to it even if MOVES.
> Take example of
> -----Shot fired from gun, gun moves backward.
> ------ Light bullet fired from TOY Gun, system remains at rest.
> Momentum is conserved in ALL THREE CASES and velocity of recoil is
> more
> or less can be calculated using Law of conservation of momentum. This
> is the use of law of conservation of linear momentum in this case.
> As Einstein did all CALCULATION UNDER CLASSICAL CONDITIONS, hence net
> REALTIVE velocity of body after recoil must be in classical region.
> Again as Einstein did calculation under CLASSICAL CONDITIONS then
> momentum variation has no effect on MASS.
> &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p;
> Part II
> Einsteinâ€?s derivation is applicable when body rema=
ins
> at REST or
> MOVES.
> The basis for this TRUTH lies in Einsteinâ€?s derivation.
> Purposely and
> Especially eq.(1) shown below which is applicable for one or&nb=
sp;
> n waves.
> (i) The central equation in Einsteinâ€?s equation
> is
> l* =3D l{1 â€? v/c cos Ï? } /â??[1 â=
;€?
> v2 /c2] (1) &n=
bsp;
> at page
> 196 of the paper.
> This equation is from Einsteinâ€?s June 1905 paper AND Eins=
tein
> used it
> in derivation of L =3Dmc2.
> With this equation magnitude of light energy is measured when one the=
re
> is relative velocity between light emitting body and measuring system.
> &nb=
sp;
> Einstein considered two frames i.e. (x,y,z) at rest
> (body placed in it) and second frame (X,Y,Z) moving with veloci=
ty
> v (
> measuring system) .
> Let body moves with velocity vâ€?, then relative vel=
ocity
> will be
> v+vâ€? and eq.(1) becomes
> l* =3D l{1 â€? (v+vâ€?) /c cos Ï? } /=
â??[1
> â€? (v+vâ€?)2 /c2] (4)
> So after emission of light energy, body remains at REST
> or MOVES,
> eq.(1) [ at page 196 of paper ] is applicable.
> When ever under any condition, body emits light energy, EINSTEIN&acir=
c;€?S
> Sep. 1905 must give that MASS MUST DECREASE.
> Thus out of three cases first one (two waves) , second one (for one
> wave) interpretation for Einstein derivation is correct. How
> it
> becomes incorrect for third case (one wave, with angle difference of
> 1
> or less) becomes incorrect.
> It is limitation of Einsteinâ€?s derivation.
> Thus Einsteinâ€?s Sep 1905 derivation is correct UNDER SPE=
CIAL
> CONDITIONS not in GENERAL.
> Explanati=
on
> for eq.(16) in paper at page 202.
> &nb=
sp; =

> Consider two waves of energy 0.5001L
> and 0.4999L , then apply law of conservation of momentum the velocity
> of RECOIL can be calculated as
> Vr =3D 1=
/10000000000000000000000000000000
> =3D 10-^32 m/s.
> Now v+vâ€? =3D v +10-^32
> So eq.(1) is valid whether body is at REST or
> MOVES after emission
> of light energy.
> Einsteinâ€?s derivation of L =3Dmc2, the body may re=
main
> at REST or
> MOVE, is applicable there is no rule of science which stops it.
> &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp;
> Section 3
> &nb=
sp; =

> Part I
> Thus it is concluded that Einsteinâ€?s derivation has four
> variables
> (i) Number of light waves
> (ii) Magnitude of energy of light waves
> (iii) Angle at which light energy is emitted
> (iv) Relative velocity v ( must be in classical region).
> All these variables in Einsteinâ€?s Sep 1905 derivation have
> numerous
> values. Energy may be emitted in any way, the mass of BODY DECREASES
> experimentally ALWAYS.
> But THEORETICALLY acc=
ording
> to Einsteinâ€?s 29 Sep. 1905
> derivation, in every time, result is not eq.(1) .
> L =3Dmc2
> Energy emitted =3D decrease in mass .c2 =

> (1)
> Einsteinâ€?s Sep. 1905 derivation also predicts MATHEMATIC=
ALLY
> that
> when body emits Light Energy its mass must also INCREASE. It
> is not
> true.
> Hence Einsteinâ€?s derivation is true under special condit=
ions
> only.
> &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp;
> Part II
> &nbs=
p;
> In addition after deriving
> L=3D dmc2 (1)
> Einstein simply replaced L and SPECULATED ( not derived)
> E=3Ddmc2
> where E is EVERY FORM OF ENERGY ( light energy, heat energy,
> sound
> energy, chemical energy in form invisible radiation etc.)=
.
> However
> basis for derivation of eq.(1) is only for light energy eq.(1) at page
> 196 of my paper.
> Thus we need to derive mass energy equation by other method and
> generalized equation is
> dE =3DAc2 dm
> where A is coefficient of proportionality, like others in the existing
> physics and its value depend upon experimental conditions.
> For details
> <a href=3D"https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cP=
ath=3D23_48_324&products_id=3D4554" >https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/=
product_info.php?cPath=3D23_48_324&products_id=3D4554</a >
> References of Einsteinâ€?s work
> .
> A.Einstein, Annalen der Physik
> 18 (1905) 639-641.
> . DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND
> UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT?
> Weblink is
> Einsteinâ€?s 27 Sep 1905 paper available at
> <a href=3D"http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/">http:/=
/www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/</a >
> &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp;
> PartII
> References of Ajay Sharmaâ€?s work
> My work is available at
> A. Sharma, Physics Essays, 17 (2004) 195-222.
> â€?The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation ï??E
> =3D Ac2 ï??M; and
> its applications in General physics and Cosmologyâ&=
euro;?.
> <a href=3D"http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf">h=
ttp://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf</a >
> For details
> <a href=3D"https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cP=
ath=3D23_48_324&products_id=3D4554" >https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/=
product_info.php?cPath=3D23_48_324&products_id=3D4554</a >
> &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp;
> International Conferences
> It has been accepted for presentation over 55 conferences all over
> the
> world
> --------------------------------------few of them
> 1. Sharma, A. presented in 19th International Conference on the
> Applications of Accelerators in Research and Indust=
ry
> , 20-25
> August , 2006 Fort Worth Texas, USA
> 2. A. Sharma, Abstract Book 38th Europe=
an
> Group of Atomic Systems
> (
> Euro physics Conference) Isachia (Naples)&nbs=
p;
> Italy (2006) 53.
> 3. A. Sharma , Abstract Book , A Century After Einstein Physics
> 2005 ,
> 10-14 April 2005 ( Organizer Institute of Physics , Bristol
> )
> University of Warwick , ENGLAND
> 4. A. Sharma presented in 5th British gravity Conference , OXFORD
> ENGLAND
> 5. A. Sharma,. Proc. Int. Conf. on Computational Methods
> in
> Sciences and
> Engineering 2003 World Scientific Co. USA ,
> (2003) 585.
> 6. A. Sharma, Proc. Int. Conf. on Number, Time, Relativity
> United
> Physical Society of
> Russian Federation, Moscow , (2004) 81
> plus more
> --------------------------------------
> &nb=
sp; =

> Journals
> This paper
> â€?The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation ï??E
> =3D Ac2 ï??M; and
> its applications in General physics and Cosmologyâ&=
euro;?.
> is published in journal
> Physics Essays , CANADA
> www.physicsessays.com
> The paper
> The past ,present and future of E=3Dmc2
> will be published in 2007 Galilean Electrodynamics, Massachuset=
ts,
> USA.
> In parts it is published in various others journals.
> ----------------------
> &nb=
sp; =

> Book 100 Years of E=3Dmc2
> For details
> <a href=3D"https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cP=
ath=3D23_48_324&products_id=3D4554" >https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/=
product_info.php?cPath=3D23_48_324&products_id=3D4554</a ></blockquote>
> Butch yous misunderstand di whole ting! Johnny undt I werked on dis vey
> hard. Please consider leaving us alone!
> Mileva Maric'
> Johnny is here and would say werd but tells me tell you t_____________=
___________________________________________________________________________=
______o</html >
>
> --------------E36053B9994D2CC3E5F47F48--

Write message in English. The message is for Group.
AJAY SHARMA

Date: 28 Sep 2006 05:23:53
From: AJAY SHARMA
Subject: Re: On 101st Birthday of Einstein's E=mc2

rpasken@eas.slu.edu wrote:
> AJAY SHARMA wrote:
> <snip out the drool and meaningless references to unpublished
> material>
>
> When you have a list of peer-reviewed papers in major physics journals,
> come back and talk to us. In the mean time selfpublished books and
> conferences that accept ANY submittal have NO MEANING
---------------------------------------
1+1 =3D2
It is true in all journals.
Is it right?
When Einstein published E=3Dmc2 , that was German journal.
100 Years of E=3Dmc2
is not self published book, you are misunderstood.

About Conferences, I have delivred lectures and my work has been
published in conferences.
I

AJAY SHARMA
---------------------------------
References.

References of Einstein=E2=80=99s work
.
A=2EEinstein, Annalen der Physik 18 (1905) 639-641.
. DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND
UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT?
Weblink is
Einstein=E2=80=99s 27 Sep 1905 paper available at
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/

PartII
References of Ajay Sharma=E2=80=99s work

My work is available at
A=2E Sharma, Physics Essays, 17 (2004) 195-222.
=E2=80=9DThe Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation =EF=81=84E =3D Ac2 =
=EF=81=84M; and
its applications in General physics and Cosmology=E2=80=9D.
http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf

For details
https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=3D23_48_324&p=
roducts_id=3D4554

International Conferences
It has been accepted for presentation over 55 conferences all over the
world
--------------------------------------few of them
1=2E Sharma, A. presented in 19th International Conference on the
Applications of Accelerators in Research and Industry , 20-25
August , 2006 Fort Worth Texas, USA

2. A. Sharma, Abstract Book 38th European Group of Atomic Systems
(
Euro physics Conference) Isachia (Naples) Italy (2006) 53.

3=2E A. Sharma , Abstract Book , A Century After Einstein Physics 2005 ,

10-14 April 2005 ( Organizer Institute of Physics , Bristol )
University of Warwick , ENGLAND

4=2E A. Sharma presented in 5th British gravity Conference , OXFORD
ENGLAND

5=2E A. Sharma,. Proc. Int. Conf. on Computational Methods in
Sciences and Engineering 2003 World Scientific Co. USA ,
(2003) 585.

6=2E A. Sharma, Proc. Int. Conf. on Number, Time, Relativity United
Physical Society of Russian Federation, Moscow , (2004) 81
plus more
--------------------------------------
Journals
This paper
=E2=80=9DThe Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation =EF=81=84E =3D Ac2 =
=EF=81=84M; and
its applications in General physics and Cosmology=E2=80=9D.
is published in journal
Physics Essays , CANADA
www.physicsessays.com
The paper
The past ,present and future of E=3Dmc2
will be published in 2007 Galilean Electrodynamics, Massachusetts,
USA.
In parts it is published in various others journals.
----------------------
Book 100 Years of E=3Dmc2
For details
https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=3D23_48_324&p=
roducts_id=3D4554

Date: 28 Sep 2006 02:21:12
From: Mileva Maric'
Subject: Re: On 101st Birthday of Einstein's E=mc2

--------------E36053B9994D2CC3E5F47F48
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

AJAY SHARMA wrote:

> When light energy is emitted, Mass increases,: Einstein’s Sep.1905
> derivation.
> It is not consistent prediction from Einstein’s Sep 1905
> derivation.
> (written in response to comments)
> How eq.(13) at page 201 in my paper I incorrect ? Then what is
> correct equation?
> In fact Eq.(13) in paper at page 201 is correct absolutely.
>
> ””””Eq.(13) is based of Einstein’s Sep 1905 derivation ,
> that THEORETICALLY when body emits Light Energy , the mass of body
> INCREASE in some cases.”””””””
> It is explained below in THREE SECTIONS.
> Section A.
> (i) Einstein has considered A body of mass 10gm (say), it emits two
> waves under special conditions (two waves of equal energy L/2 each ,
> emitted in opposite directions w.r.t measuring system) . Obviously
> mass decreases, which is converted to light energy and Einstein‘s
> equation is
> L =dmc2
> Energy emitted = decrease in mass .c2 (1)
> (ii) If we consider the same body , it emits light energy at angle 90
> w.r.t to the moving system , then again Einstein’s derivation gives
> L =mc2
> Energy emitted = decrease in mass .c2 (2)
> Both the cases are correct . Eq.(2) is not derived by Einstein.
>
> Einstein’s 27 Sep 1905 paper available at
> http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/
>
> (iii) If we consider the same body , it emits light energy at angle
> 90 o w.r.t to the moving system , then again Einstein’s derivation
> gives
>
> Ho = H1 + β L( 1 – v/c cos89 o)
> Ho = H1 + β L (1– 0.017452406 v/c)
> Now proceeding as in Eq.(5) to Eq.(10) we get
> Δ m = – 0.03490L/cv + L/c2 (13) at
> page 201 of paper
> Thus Einstein’s derivation implies that when body emits light energy
> at angle 89 o then its MASS must INCREASE. If this angle is 0 then
> Einstein’s derivation implies that when Light Energy is emitted ,
> mass decreases.
>
> Sharma June 2004 paper is available
> http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf
> For further elaborated discussion link is
>
> https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=23_48_324&products_id=4554
>
> Thus Einstein’s derivation is not true in general, it holds good
> under special conditions only.
> I have given 2nd and 3rd example purposely that up to which extent
> Einstein’s derivation depends upon angle. Angle up to 90 o is OK in
> Einstein’s derivation of Sep 1905. If it slightly decreases (even
> 89.9 o ) then, then RESULTS ARE CONTRADICTORY to results.
>
> Section B
> It is crystal clear that as Einstein’s derivation as applicable to
> first example ( two waves of equal energy L/2 each , emitted in
> opposite directions w.r.t measuring system) and second example ( a
> single wave of energy L emitted at 89 o or 89.5 o w.r.t measuring
> system ).Thus Einstein’s derivation is also applicable to third
> example (a single wave of energy L emitted at 89 o or 89.5 o w.r.t
> measuring system).
>
> As results are inconsistent then it is due to LIMITATIONS of
> Einstein’s derivation only, as it is equally applicable in all the
> three cases.
> It is explained below that
> law of ‘conservation of momentum’ holds good and ‘conditions of
> applicability’ of Einstein’s derivation are applicable to ALL THREE
> CASES.
>
> Part I
> (a) Law of conservation of momentum is obeyed completely.
> Conservation of momentum is meant for isolated system and
> mathematically implies that
> Initial Momentum = Final Momentum (3)
> mu=mv
> As mass remains same in classical mechanics.
> So u=v
> which is Newton’s First law of motion
> It is used to calculate the velocity of recoil of body after emission
> of energy in any way.
>
> --It is applicable if body moves or remains at rest after emitting
> energy.
> Einstein has done the case when body remain at rest ONLY, I have
> extended to it even if MOVES.
> Take example of
> -----Shot fired from gun, gun moves backward.
> ------ Light bullet fired from TOY Gun, system remains at rest.
> Momentum is conserved in ALL THREE CASES and velocity of recoil is more
> or less can be calculated using Law of conservation of momentum. This
> is the use of law of conservation of linear momentum in this case.
> As Einstein did all CALCULATION UNDER CLASSICAL CONDITIONS, hence net
> REALTIVE velocity of body after recoil must be in classical region.
> Again as Einstein did calculation under CLASSICAL CONDITIONS then
> momentum variation has no effect on MASS.
>
> Part II
> Einstein’s derivation is applicable when body remains at REST or
> MOVES.
> The basis for this TRUTH lies in Einstein’s derivation. Purposely and
> Especially eq.(1) shown below which is applicable for one or n waves.
> (i) The central equation in Einstein‘s equation is
>
> l* = l{1 – v/c cos φ } /√[1 – v2 /c2] (1) at page
> 196 of the paper.
>
> This equation is from Einstein’s June 1905 paper AND Einstein used it
> in derivation of L =mc2.
> With this equation magnitude of light energy is measured when one there
> is relative velocity between light emitting body and measuring system.
> Einstein considered two frames i.e. (x,y,z) at rest
> (body placed in it) and second frame (X,Y,Z) moving with velocity v (
> measuring system) .
> Let body moves with velocity v’, then relative velocity will be
> v+v’ and eq.(1) becomes
>
> l* = l{1 – (v+v’) /c cos φ } /√[1 – (v+v’)2 /c2] (4)
>
> So after emission of light energy, body remains at REST or MOVES,
> eq.(1) [ at page 196 of paper ] is applicable.
> When ever under any condition, body emits light energy, EINSTEIN’S
> Sep. 1905 must give that MASS MUST DECREASE.
>
> Thus out of three cases first one (two waves) , second one (for one
> wave) interpretation for Einstein derivation is correct. How it
> becomes incorrect for third case (one wave, with angle difference of 1
> or less) becomes incorrect.
> It is limitation of Einstein’s derivation.
> Thus Einstein’s Sep 1905 derivation is correct UNDER SPECIAL
> CONDITIONS not in GENERAL.
>
> Explanation for eq.(16) in paper at page 202.
> Consider two waves of energy 0.5001L
> and 0.4999L , then apply law of conservation of momentum the velocity
> of RECOIL can be calculated as
> Vr = 1/10000000000000000000000000000000 = 10-^32 m/s.
> Now v+v’ = v +10-^32
> So eq.(1) is valid whether body is at REST or MOVES after emission
> of light energy.
> Einstein’s derivation of L =mc2, the body may remain at REST or
> MOVE, is applicable there is no rule of science which stops it.
>
> Section 3
> Part I
> Thus it is concluded that Einstein’s derivation has four variables
> (i) Number of light waves
> (ii) Magnitude of energy of light waves
> (iii) Angle at which light energy is emitted
> (iv) Relative velocity v ( must be in classical region).
>
> All these variables in Einstein’s Sep 1905 derivation have numerous
> values. Energy may be emitted in any way, the mass of BODY DECREASES
> experimentally ALWAYS.
>
> But THEORETICALLY according to Einstein’s 29 Sep. 1905
> derivation, in every time, result is not eq.(1) .
> L =mc2
> Energy emitted = decrease in mass .c2 (1)
> Einstein’s Sep. 1905 derivation also predicts MATHEMATICALLY that
> when body emits Light Energy its mass must also INCREASE. It is not
> true.
> Hence Einstein’s derivation is true under special conditions only.
>
> Part II
>
> In addition after deriving
> L= dmc2 (1)
> Einstein simply replaced L and SPECULATED ( not derived)
> E=dmc2
> where E is EVERY FORM OF ENERGY ( light energy, heat energy, sound
> energy, chemical energy in form invisible radiation etc.). However
> basis for derivation of eq.(1) is only for light energy eq.(1) at page
> 196 of my paper.
>
> Thus we need to derive mass energy equation by other method and
> generalized equation is
> dE =Ac2 dm
> where A is coefficient of proportionality, like others in the existing
> physics and its value depend upon experimental conditions.
> For details
> https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=23_48_324&products_id=4554
>
> References of Einstein’s work
> .
> A.Einstein, Annalen der Physik 18 (1905) 639-641.
> . DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND
> UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT?
> Weblink is
> Einstein’s 27 Sep 1905 paper available at
> http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/
>
> PartII
> References of Ajay Sharma’s work
>
> My work is available at
> A. Sharma, Physics Essays, 17 (2004) 195-222.
> ”The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation E = Ac2 M; and
> its applications in General physics and Cosmology”.
> http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf
> For details
> https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=23_48_324&products_id=4554
>
> International Conferences
> It has been accepted for presentation over 55 conferences all over the
> world
> --------------------------------------few of them
> 1. Sharma, A. presented in 19th International Conference on the
> Applications of Accelerators in Research and Industry , 20-25
> August , 2006 Fort Worth Texas, USA
>
> 2. A. Sharma, Abstract Book 38th European Group of Atomic Systems
> (
> Euro physics Conference) Isachia (Naples) Italy (2006) 53.
>
> 3. A. Sharma , Abstract Book , A Century After Einstein Physics 2005 ,
>
> 10-14 April 2005 ( Organizer Institute of Physics , Bristol )
> University of Warwick , ENGLAND
>
> 4. A. Sharma presented in 5th British gravity Conference , OXFORD
> ENGLAND
>
> 5. A. Sharma,. Proc. Int. Conf. on Computational Methods in
> Sciences and Engineering 2003 World Scientific Co. USA ,
> (2003) 585.
>
> 6. A. Sharma, Proc. Int. Conf. on Number, Time, Relativity United
> Physical Society of Russian Federation, Moscow , (2004) 81
> plus more
> --------------------------------------
> Journals
> This paper
> ”The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation E = Ac2 M; and
> its applications in General physics and Cosmology”.
> is published in journal
> Physics Essays , CANADA
> www.physicsessays.com
> The paper
> The past ,present and future of E=mc2
> will be published in 2007 Galilean Electrodynamics, Massachusetts,
> USA.
> In parts it is published in various others journals.
> ----------------------
> Book 100 Years of E=mc2
> For details
> https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=23_48_324&products_id=4554

Butch yous misunderstand di whole ting! Johnny undt I werked on dis vey
hard. Please consider leaving us alone!
Mileva Maric'

Johnny is here and would say werd but tells me tell you
t______________________________________________________________________________________________o

--------------E36053B9994D2CC3E5F47F48
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

<!dype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en" >
<html >

AJAY SHARMA wrote:
<blockquote TYPE=CITE >When light energy is emitted, Mass increases,: Einsteinâ€�s
Sep.1905
 derivation.
 It is not consistent prediction from Einsteinâ€�s
Sep 1905
 derivation.
 
(written in response to comments)
 How eq.(13) at page 201 in my paper I incorrect
? Then what is
 correct equation?
 In fact Eq.(13) in paper at page 201 is correct absolutely.
â€�â€�â€�â€�Eq.(13)
is based of Einsteinâ€�s Sep 1905 derivation ,
 that THEORETICALLY when body emits Light Energy , the mass of
body
 INCREASE in some cases.â€�â€�â€�â€�â€�â€�â€�
 It is explained below in THREE SECTIONS.
 
Section A.
 (i) Einstein has considered A body of mass 10gm (say), it emits two
 waves under special conditions (two waves of equal energy L/2 each
,
 emitted in opposite directions w.r.t measuring system)
. Obviously
 mass decreases, which is converted to light energy and Einsteinâ€�s
 equation is
 L =dmc2
 Energy emitted = decrease in mass .c2
(1)
 (ii) If we consider the same body , it emits light energy
at angle 90
 w.r.t to the moving system , then again Einsteinâ€�s
derivation gives
 L =mc2
 Energy emitted = decrease in mass .c2
(2)
 Both the cases are correct . Eq.(2) is not derived by Einstein.
Einsteinâ€�s 27 Sep 1905 paper available at
 <a href="http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/">http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/</a>
(iii) If we consider the same body , it emits light energy
at angle
 90 o w.r.t to the moving system , then again Einsteinâ€�s
derivation
 gives
Ho = H1 + Î² L( 1 â€� v/c cos89 o)
 Ho = H1 + Î² L (1â€� 0.017452406
v/c)
 Now proceeding as in Eq.(5) to Eq.(10) we get
 Î� m = â€�
0.03490L/cv + L/c2
(13) at
 page 201 of paper
 Thus Einsteinâ€�s derivation implies that when body emits
light energy
 at angle 89 o then its MASS must INCREASE. If this angle is 0 then
 Einsteinâ€�s derivation implies that when Light Energy
is emitted ,
 mass decreases.
Sharma June 2004 paper is available
 <a href="http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf">http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf</a>
 For further elaborated discussion link is
<a href="https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=23_48_324&products_id=4554">https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=23_48_324&products_id=4554</a>
Thus Einsteinâ€�s derivation is not true in general, it holds
good
 under special conditions only.
 I have given 2nd and 3rd example purposely that up to which extent
 Einsteinâ€�s derivation depends upon angle. Angle
up to 90 o is OK in
 Einsteinâ€�s derivation of Sep 1905. If it slightly decreases
(even
 89.9 o ) then, then RESULTS ARE CONTRADICTORY to results.

Section B
 It is crystal clear that as Einsteinâ€�s derivation
as applicable to
 first example ( two waves of equal energy L/2 each
, emitted in
 opposite directions w.r.t measuring system) and second
example ( a
 single wave of energy L emitted at 89 o or 89.5 o w.r.t
measuring
 system ).Thus Einsteinâ€�s derivation is also
applicable to third
 example (a single wave of energy L emitted at 89 o or 89.5
o w.r.t
 measuring system).
As results are inconsistent then it is due to LIMITATIONS of
 Einsteinâ€�s derivation only, as it is equally applicable
in all the
 three cases.
 
It is explained below that
 law of â€�conservation of momentumâ€� holds good
and â€�conditions of
 applicabilityâ€� of Einsteinâ€�s derivation are
applicable to ALL THREE
 CASES.

Part I
 (a) Law of conservation of momentum is obeyed
completely.
 Conservation of momentum is meant for isolated system and
 mathematically implies that
 Initial Momentum = Final
Momentum (3)
 
mu=mv
 As mass remains same in classical mechanics.
 So u=v
 which is Newtonâ€�s First law of motion
 It is used to calculate the velocity of recoil of body after emission
 of energy in any way.
--It is applicable if body moves or remains at rest after emitting
 energy.
 Einstein has done the case when body remain at rest ONLY, I have
 extended to it even if MOVES.
 Take example of
 -----Shot fired from gun, gun moves backward.
 ------ Light bullet fired from TOY Gun, system remains at rest.
 Momentum is conserved in ALL THREE CASES and velocity of recoil is
more
 or less can be calculated using Law of conservation of momentum. This
 is the use of law of conservation of linear momentum in this case.
 As Einstein did all CALCULATION UNDER CLASSICAL CONDITIONS, hence net
 REALTIVE velocity of body after recoil must be in classical region.
 Again as Einstein did calculation under CLASSICAL CONDITIONS then
 momentum variation has no effect on MASS.

Part II
 Einsteinâ€�s derivation is applicable when body remains
at REST or
 MOVES.
 The basis for this TRUTH lies in Einsteinâ€�s derivation.
Purposely and
 Especially eq.(1) shown below which is applicable for one or
n waves.
 (i) The central equation in Einsteinâ€�s equation
is
 l* = l{1 â€� v/c cos Ï� } /â��[1 â€�
v2 /c2] (1)
at page
 196 of the paper.
This equation is from Einsteinâ€�s June 1905 paper AND Einstein
used it
 in derivation of L =mc2.
 With this equation magnitude of light energy is measured when one there
 is relative velocity between light emitting body and measuring system.
 
Einstein considered two frames i.e. (x,y,z) at rest
 (body placed in it) and second frame (X,Y,Z) moving with velocity
v (
 measuring system) .
 Let body moves with velocity vâ€�, then relative velocity
will be
 v+vâ€� and eq.(1) becomes
 l* = l{1 â€� (v+vâ€�) /c cos Ï� } /â��[1
â€� (v+vâ€�)2 /c2] (4)
So after emission of light energy, body remains at REST
or MOVES,
 eq.(1) [ at page 196 of paper ] is applicable.
 When ever under any condition, body emits light energy, EINSTEINâ€�S
 Sep. 1905 must give that MASS MUST DECREASE.
Thus out of three cases first one (two waves) , second one (for one
 wave) interpretation for Einstein derivation is correct. How
it
 becomes incorrect for third case (one wave, with angle difference of
1
 or less) becomes incorrect.
 It is limitation of Einsteinâ€�s derivation.
 Thus Einsteinâ€�s Sep 1905 derivation is correct UNDER SPECIAL
 CONDITIONS not in GENERAL.
 Explanation
for eq.(16) in paper at page 202.
 
Consider two waves of energy 0.5001L
 and 0.4999L , then apply law of conservation of momentum the velocity
 of RECOIL can be calculated as
 Vr = 1/10000000000000000000000000000000
= 10-^32 m/s.
 Now v+vâ€� = v +10-^32
 So eq.(1) is valid whether body is at REST or
MOVES after emission
 of light energy.
 Einsteinâ€�s derivation of L =mc2, the body may remain
at REST or
 MOVE, is applicable there is no rule of science which stops it.

Section 3
 
Part I
 Thus it is concluded that Einsteinâ€�s derivation has four
variables
 (i) Number of light waves
 (ii) Magnitude of energy of light waves
 (iii) Angle at which light energy is emitted
 (iv) Relative velocity v ( must be in classical region).
All these variables in Einsteinâ€�s Sep 1905 derivation have
numerous
 values. Energy may be emitted in any way, the mass of BODY DECREASES
 experimentally ALWAYS.
 But THEORETICALLY according
to Einsteinâ€�s 29 Sep. 1905
 derivation, in every time, result is not eq.(1) .
 L =mc2
 Energy emitted = decrease in mass .c2
(1)
 Einsteinâ€�s Sep. 1905 derivation also predicts MATHEMATICALLY
that
 when body emits Light Energy its mass must also INCREASE. It
is not
 true.
 Hence Einsteinâ€�s derivation is true under special conditions
only.

Part II

In addition after deriving
 L= dmc2 (1)
 Einstein simply replaced L and SPECULATED ( not derived)
 E=dmc2
 where E is EVERY FORM OF ENERGY ( light energy, heat energy,
sound
 energy, chemical energy in form invisible radiation etc.).
However
 basis for derivation of eq.(1) is only for light energy eq.(1) at page
 196 of my paper.
Thus we need to derive mass energy equation by other method and
 generalized equation is
 dE =Ac2 dm
 where A is coefficient of proportionality, like others in the existing
 physics and its value depend upon experimental conditions.
 For details
 <a href="https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=23_48_324&products_id=4554">https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=23_48_324&products_id=4554</a>
References of Einsteinâ€�s work
 .
 A.Einstein, Annalen der Physik
18 (1905) 639-641.
 . DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND
 UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT?
 Weblink is
 Einsteinâ€�s 27 Sep 1905 paper available at
 <a href="http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/">http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/</a>

PartII
 References of Ajay Sharmaâ€�s work
My work is available at
 A. Sharma, Physics Essays, 17 (2004) 195-222.
 â€�The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation ï��E
= Ac2 ï��M; and
 its applications in General physics and Cosmologyâ€�.
 <a href="http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf">http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf</a>
 For details
 <a href="https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=23_48_324&products_id=4554">https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=23_48_324&products_id=4554</a>

International Conferences
 It has been accepted for presentation over 55 conferences all over
the
 world
 --------------------------------------few of them
 1. Sharma, A. presented in 19th International Conference on the
 Applications of Accelerators in Research and Industry
, 20-25
 August , 2006 Fort Worth Texas, USA
 2. A. Sharma, Abstract Book 38th European
Group of Atomic Systems
 (
 Euro physics Conference) Isachia (Naples)
Italy (2006) 53.
3. A. Sharma , Abstract Book , A Century After Einstein Physics
2005 ,
10-14 April 2005 ( Organizer Institute of Physics , Bristol
)
 University of Warwick , ENGLAND
4. A. Sharma presented in 5th British gravity Conference , OXFORD
 ENGLAND
5. A. Sharma,. Proc. Int. Conf. on Computational Methods
in
 Sciences and
Engineering 2003 World Scientific Co. USA ,
 (2003) 585.
6. A. Sharma, Proc. Int. Conf. on Number, Time, Relativity
United
 Physical Society of
Russian Federation, Moscow , (2004) 81
 plus more
 --------------------------------------
 
Journals
 This paper
 â€�The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation ï��E
= Ac2 ï��M; and
 its applications in General physics and Cosmologyâ€�.
 is published in journal
 Physics Essays , CANADA
 www.physicsessays.com
 The paper
 The past ,present and future of E=mc2
 will be published in 2007 Galilean Electrodynamics, Massachusetts,
 USA.
 In parts it is published in various others journals.
 ----------------------
 
Book 100 Years of E=mc2
 For details
 <a href="https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=23_48_324&products_id=4554">https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=23_48_324&products_id=4554</a></blockquote>
Butch yous misunderstand di whole ting! Johnny undt I werked on dis vey
 hard. Please consider leaving us alone!
 Mileva Maric'
Johnny is here and would say werd but tells me tell you t______________________________________________________________________________________________o</html>

--------------E36053B9994D2CC3E5F47F48--