| |
Main
Date: 09 Sep 2006 16:51:40
From: Astronomer Extraordinaire!
Subject: NASA's team of star-logicians still don't get it
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
THEY'RE LOOKING AT nearly the same planetary aspects as
they were yesterday, Jupiter is ruling 9 in Ascendancy;
Mars and Lilith co-ruling 8 Mercury, Sun near transit;
Venus ruling 7 over Saturn exalted in angle midheaven.
At launch time, the moment the shuttle lifted off from
the surface of the Earth, that locked their horoscope
in place. Until they land, this horoscope follows them,
especially in relation to each one of the crew onboard...
But NASA astrologers don't understand how to compute the
part of Fortune. As in this particular instance, launch
was 11:15 EDT today (Saturn's Day, September 9th, 2006 AD),
they confused the part of Fortune with the part of Spirit.
This is because they've been falsely taught that "morning"
versus "evening" calculations of Greek Lots, Arabic Parts,
etc., pertain to the position of the Sun, which it never
did! And they've made myriad other miscalculations, too...
As in this instance, the (Arabic) Part of Fortune is in
the 3rd, not 4th, house of the horoscope. This is because
the Ascendant is aloft the East Point (equatorial ascendant)
in the sixth house of night (i.e. mundane pisces, or twelfth
house). You see, the further north or south of the terrestrial
equator you are, then the Ascendant oscillates further above
and equally further below the East Point, once sidereal-daily
(i.e. in Earth's meridian houses, the only effective houses).
Remember, Part of Fortune is the angular distance from the
Sun to the Moon added to the local Ascendant for "morning"
calculations, meaning the Ascendant would have to be BELOW
the East Point in the first, second, or even into the third
house of morning at high latitudes for that calculation to
be correct for that geographical location. Conversely, when
the Ascendant is ABOVE the East Point in the sixth, fifth,
or even the fourth house of night at high latitudes, then
the proper calculation for Part of Fortune is "flipped" or
reversed between the Sun and Moon, meaning that the angular
distance between the Moon and the Sun is added to the local
Ascendant.
Hence, the calculation for the latest re-scheduled shuttle
launch from Cape Canaveral, FL (~80w36, ~28n24), found the
Ascendant more than eight arc-degrees (~8.39) above the EP,
rendering the magnitude of fortune debilitate in the third
house particularly portentous in opposition to Jupiter in
ascendancy in the ninth house (i.e. Sagittarian Ascendant).
Fortune in the third house often portends a long, grueling
series of trials and tribulations in life. Whereas Fortune
fallen in the sixth house is usually portentous of a rapid
decline in health, else an abrupt and oft-excruciating death.
Thus, applied to the astro-logical conditions for this shuttle
mission, there is strong potential for a conspicuous series of
everything from tiny glitches to life-threatening predicaments.
Whether or not such difficulties should befall this mission has
much to do with the Spirit in which the crew and ground control
are praying and giving thanks to God, and are humble before God,
and are performing their duties in His presence, and compliance
with His Universal Law & Grace, in communication with God, etc.
But, given the arrogance of the NASA spokesmen, e.g. "we're
opening up the Cosmos for all human beings", etc., humility
before God the Creator is found wanting: at a minimum, they
should humbly and joyfully acknowledge that God Almighty is
the Creator of His infinite Universe--His awesome handiwork.
But we seldom hear such declarations from NASA. That's not good.
I mean, get real! The shuttle is a *low-earth orbit* antiquated
technology vehicle. It was never anything more than that. Any
"space station" is similarly confined to low-earth orbit, and
never shall it or any manned vehicle exceed Earth-confinement
of a few hundred miles above sea level (at maximum altitude),
at not until the pilots and their crafts come into compliance.
NASA's hardly "opening up the Cosmos" by any stretch of one's
imagination. A few hundred miles into local Earth-space isn't
scratching the surface of God's infinite and eternal Cosmos(!).
NASA's accomplished some great things with unmanned instruments
venturing into deep space--well beyond the confinement of Earth,
and that's plenty to be proud of. But NASA has also exaggerated,
and in some glaring cases, systematically lied about and covered-
up a whole plethora of things they, the Air Force, et al, don't
want made public. E.g., the Apollo "men-to-the-moon" fairy tale,
denials and cover-ups of evidence and encounters with UFOs, etc.
And the list hardly stops there. Thank God they are each judged
according to their works of good & evil, e.g., of truth & lies.
A little humility on the part of NASA & Co. would go a long way
towards attenuating the potentially-disastrous signals, by the
elements, by the law of the Sun & Venus contending in combat
superior and inferior.
NASA could use more honesty and transparency in their program.
Above all, they could use a whole lot more humility before God,
and never cease to remind the public at large that God Almighty,
not mere mortal, fallible, sinful vulnerable men, is the eternal
Creator of His infinite and eternal Universe. Never forget this! :)
In Vigilance,
Daniel Joseph Min
______________________________________________________________
*Download Min's Banned (Freeware) Books:
http://www.2hot2cool.com/11/danieljosephmin/
*Min's Spiritual I.Q. Test (how smart are you, really):
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=HCRHGLQM38786.0401967593@anonymous.poster
*Min's Google-Archived Home Page On The WWW:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=XJBDEJF138262.9022453704@anonymous.poster
*Min's Official PGP Public Key (MIT Keyserver compromised):
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=KCQRMQOW38919.8812962963@twistycreek.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQA/AwUBRQLvzJljD7YrHM/nEQKHUgCgiTeZWPuv2RE/CF6cUBexFYasxbYAnijy
7iHhTmULJiztoH5PYXvsSpyh
=5uwB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
|
| |
Date: 09 Sep 2006 17:44:56
From: Malcontent
Subject: Re: NASA's team of star-logicians still don't get it
|
"Things Daniel Joseph Min would say", Alex?
Good!
I'll take "Psychotic Net-Kooks" again, for $1000...
|
| | |
Date: 13 Sep 2006 17:49:29
From: Abby Normal
Subject: Re: NASA's team of star-logicians still don't get it
|
ROFL
"Malcontent" <mmmmf@ummmm.yum > wrote in message
news:5oSdndeO7a5JqJ7YnZ2dnUVZ_r6dnZ2d@adelphia.com...
> "Things Daniel Joseph Min would say", Alex?
>
> Good!
>
> I'll take "Psychotic Net-Kooks" again, for $1000...
>
>
|
| |
Date: 09 Sep 2006 11:34:15
From: Igor
Subject: Re: NASA's team of star-logicians still don't get it
|
Why would NASA even care about such unscientific nonsense?
|
| | |
Date: 09 Sep 2006 16:07:30
From: Richard Adams
Subject: Re: NASA's team of star-logicians still don't get it
|
Igor wrote:
> Why would NASA even care about such unscientific nonsense?
>
Maybe when they need a laugh in the breakroom they have a look at Min's
contribution to: An infinite number of monkeys with an infinite number
of typewriters on the way to Shakespearean sonnets.
|
| | | |
Date: 10 Sep 2006 08:13:21
From: Paul Schlyter
Subject: Re: NASA's team of star-logicians still don't get it
|
In article <edv6u2$212@dispatch.concentric.net >,
Richard Adams <ackthpt@concentric.net > wrote:
> Igor wrote:
>> Why would NASA even care about such unscientific nonsense?
>>
>
> Maybe when they need a laugh in the breakroom they have a look at Min's
> contribution to: An infinite number of monkeys with an infinite number
> of typewriters on the way to Shakespearean sonnets.
There'd be one practical problem though: how would you be able to
even find that Shakespearean sonnet among all that infinite garbage?
--
----------------------------------------------------------------
Paul Schlyter, Grev Turegatan 40, SE-114 38 Stockholm, SWEDEN
e-mail: pausch at stockholm dot bostream dot se
WWW: http://stjarnhimlen.se/
|
| | | | |
Date: 10 Sep 2006 23:26:58
From: John Schutkeker
Subject: Re: NASA's team of star-logicians still don't get it
|
pausch@saaf.se (Paul Schlyter) wrote in
news:ee0gtv$220u$1@merope.saaf.se:
> In article <edv6u2$212@dispatch.concentric.net>,
> Richard Adams <ackthpt@concentric.net> wrote:
>
>> Igor wrote:
>>> Why would NASA even care about such unscientific nonsense?
>>
>> Maybe when they need a laugh in the breakroom they have a look at
>> Min's contribution to: An infinite number of monkeys with an infinite
>> number of typewriters on the way to Shakespearean sonnets.
>
> There'd be one practical problem though: how would you be able to
> even find that Shakespearean sonnet among all that infinite garbage?
To do that, I guess you'd have to get another room, containing a
different infinity of monkeys, trained to recognize Shakeapeare. And
with geniuses like the OP in here, I often suspect that the Usenet might
be the second room. :(~
|
| | |
Date: 09 Sep 2006 20:00:07
From: The Ghost In The Machine
Subject: Re: NASA's team of star-logicians still don't get it
|
In sci.physics, Igor
<thoovler@excite.com >
wrote
on 9 Sep 2006 11:34:15 -0700
<1157826855.038447.253120@d34g2000cwd.googlegroups.com >:
>
> Why would NASA even care about such unscientific nonsense?
>
Well, when the moon's in the seventh house, and Jupiter
aligns with Mars, then SDI becomes obsolete obviously,
as love will rule the stars in the dawning of the
Age of Aquarius...the Ag of Aquarius.... Aquarius....
*cough*
Sorry.
:-)
Personally, I'm more practical minded, though admittedly
I'd have some work to do to predict how well a rocket
can get to Jupiter given the time of day and the right
ascension and declination of Jupiter at that time of day.
(For such purposes, absent things such as the Perseid
meteor shower, the actual "house" -- zodiac sign -- is
largely irrelevant. Besides, Min's a known crank.)
--
#191, ewill3@earthlink.net
Windows Vista. Because it's time to refresh your hardware. Trust us.
|
|
