| |
Main
Date: 08 Sep 2006 14:58:03
From: Astronomer Extraordinaire
Subject: NASA astrologers overlook one little detail...
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
WHILE THE Sagittarian is on the Ascendant, Mars 8 Mercury, Venus 7,
Saturn MC 6, Fortune isn't 4 but is 3, due to EVENING Ascendant in
the meridian houses (because true, biblical, God-fearing, judicial
astrologers know that ONLY meridian houses ever actually apply for
computing and adjudging Judicial horoscopes in all cases, bar none).
It's a minor detail, but is an important one. But with Moon 2, she
is exalted. The Gods favor launch, but Fortune 3rd *is* a problem.
(This is assuming 11:40 AM EDT liftoff. NASA "might" rethink this,
but they'll, at least publicly, doubtless blame something mundane.)
In Vigilance,
Daniel Joseph Min
______________________________________________________________
*Download Min's Banned (Freeware) Books:
http://www.2hot2cool.com/11/danieljosephmin/
*Min's Spiritual I.Q. Test (how smart are you, really):
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=HCRHGLQM38786.0401967593@anonymous.poster
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=HCRHGLQM38786.0401967593 <AT > anonymous.poster
*Min's Google-Archived Home Page On The WWW:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=XJBDEJF138262.9022453704@anonymous.poster
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=XJBDEJF138262.9022453704 <AT > anonymous.poster
*Min's Official PGP Public Key (MIT Keyserver compromised):
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=KCQRMQOW38919.8812962963@twistycreek.com
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=KCQRMQOW38919.8812962963 <AT > twistycreek.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQA/AwUBRQGBwJljD7YrHM/nEQISqwCfRRyfHIIwu+RGtu6G//ux9onkLdgAoMdG
PHaU0ihDklxCXTne3NK9TxRK
=XUPR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
|
| |
Date: 08 Sep 2006 08:09:05
From: W8MJE
Subject: Re: NASA astrologers overlook one little detail...
|
Astronomer Extraordinaire wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> WHILE THE Sagittarian is on the Ascendant, Mars 8 Mercury, Venus 7,
> Saturn MC 6...
Yet another argument for making this a moderated group ;-)
|
| | |
Date: 08 Sep 2006 09:14:18
From: Shawn Curry
Subject: Re: Barlow ?
|
Terry A Haimann wrote:
> For a 20cm sct, what would be a good barlow for splitting binaries? It
> would need to balance performance with economy, I can NOT afford a TeleVue.
I'm curious about Orion's new "apo" barlows:
http://tinyurl.com/zr7qd
Shawn
|
|
