| |
Main
Date: 06 Sep 2006 19:38:15
From: Thomas
Subject: Methane Ice
|
The picture is conspicuously similar to the Titan
"rocks" photoed by Hyugens.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14696694/
|
|
| |
Date: 06 Sep 2006 15:33:37
From: Richard Adams
Subject: Re: Methane Ice
|
Thomas wrote:
> "Richard Adams" <ackthpt@concentric.net> wrote in message
> news:1157576022.356482.74000@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > Thomas wrote:
> >> The picture is conspicuously similar to the Titan
> >> "rocks" photoed by Hyugens.
> >>
> >> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14696694/
> >
> > Which picture? I see:
> > A. bubbles trapped under ice
> > B. ice covered ponds
> > C. ice wedges Siberia.
> >
>
>
> Pretty obvious you idiot
Not without a reference, Thomas. I don't know what pictures you are
comparing any of these to.
|
| | |
Date: 07 Sep 2006 01:25:11
From: Thomas
Subject: Re: Methane Ice
|
>
> Not without a reference, Thomas. I don't know what pictures you are
> comparing any of these to.
Ummmm... you did see the closeup surface pics of Titan didn't you..the
"ROCKS".
If you didn't, then where have you been?
|
| | | |
Date: 07 Sep 2006 03:01:04
From: Sam Wormley
Subject: Re: Methane Ice
|
Thomas wrote:
>> Not without a reference, Thomas. I don't know what pictures you are
>> comparing any of these to.
>
>
> Ummmm... you did see the closeup surface pics of Titan didn't you..the
> "ROCKS".
> If you didn't, then where have you been?
>
>
Try to be more friendly Thomas Mick. 5 cents please.
|
| | | |
Date: 06 Sep 2006 21:50:23
From: Richard Adams
Subject: Re: Methane Ice
|
Thomas wrote:
>>Not without a reference, Thomas. I don't know what pictures you are
>>comparing any of these to.
>
>
>
> Ummmm... you did see the closeup surface pics of Titan didn't you..the
> "ROCKS".
> If you didn't, then where have you been?
>
Looking at globular clusters.
|
| | | | |
Date: 07 Sep 2006 02:02:24
From: Thomas
Subject: Re: Methane Ice
|
"Richard Adams" <ackthpt@concentric.net > wrote in message
news:edntsv$iv5@dispatch.concentric.net...
> Thomas wrote:
>
>>>Not without a reference, Thomas. I don't know what pictures you are
>>>comparing any of these to.
>>
>>
>>
>> Ummmm... you did see the closeup surface pics of Titan didn't you..the
>> "ROCKS".
>> If you didn't, then where have you been?
>
> Looking at globular clusters.
You're a star.
|
| | | | | |
Date: 06 Sep 2006 21:56:17
From: Richard Adams
Subject: Re: Methane Ice
|
Thomas wrote:
> "Richard Adams" <ackthpt@concentric.net> wrote in message
> news:edntsv$iv5@dispatch.concentric.net...
>
>>Thomas wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>Not without a reference, Thomas. I don't know what pictures you are
>>>>comparing any of these to.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Ummmm... you did see the closeup surface pics of Titan didn't you..the
>>>"ROCKS".
>>>If you didn't, then where have you been?
>>
>>Looking at globular clusters.
>
>
> You're a star.
>
>
No, I'm just star-struck.
|
| |
Date: 06 Sep 2006 13:53:46
From: Richard Adams
Subject: Re: Methane Ice
|
Thomas wrote:
> The picture is conspicuously similar to the Titan
> "rocks" photoed by Hyugens.
>
> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14696694/
Which picture? I see:
A. bubbles trapped under ice
B. ice covered ponds
C. ice wedges Siberia.
Methane Ice sounds like the next thing from one of the megabrewers.
"Drink this and get gas"
The release of CH4 and CO2 from permafrost just sounds like another
boot hitting the tile.
First there was measureable global warming, which was likely expected
to be linear.
Then there was found global warming is compounding, an increasing rate
each year.
Which would the CH4 & CO2 release likely support:
A. Increasing rates?
B. Addition to already increasing rates?
There was a good bit on the BBC this weekend about the melting of
glaciers in the Alps.
|
| | |
Date: 07 Sep 2006 02:04:34
From: Thomas
Subject: Re: Methane Ice
|
>
> Methane Ice sounds like the next thing from one of the megabrewers.
> "Drink this and get gas"
>
> The release of CH4 and CO2 from permafrost just sounds like another
> boot hitting the tile.
> First there was measureable global warming, which was likely expected
> to be linear.
> Then there was found global warming is compounding, an increasing rate
> each year.
>
> Which would the CH4 & CO2 release likely support:
>
> A. Increasing rates?
> B. Addition to already increasing rates?
>
> There was a good bit on the BBC this weekend about the melting of
> glaciers in the Alps.
All of the above. Do I get a A?
|
| | | |
Date: 06 Sep 2006 22:02:38
From: Richard Adams
Subject: Re: Methane Ice
|
Thomas wrote:
>>Methane Ice sounds like the next thing from one of the megabrewers.
>>"Drink this and get gas"
>>
>>The release of CH4 and CO2 from permafrost just sounds like another
>>boot hitting the tile.
>>First there was measureable global warming, which was likely expected
>>to be linear.
>>Then there was found global warming is compounding, an increasing rate
>>each year.
>>
>>Which would the CH4 & CO2 release likely support:
>>
>>A. Increasing rates?
>>B. Addition to already increasing rates?
>>
>>There was a good bit on the BBC this weekend about the melting of
>>glaciers in the Alps.
>
>
>
> All of the above. Do I get a A?
>
>
How about a gold star?
I'm wondering if this is behind the rash of very poor viewing nights
this year. Hear's hoping Autumn is much drier and clearer.
|
| | | | |
Date: 07 Sep 2006 03:15:14
From: Thomas
Subject: Re: Methane Ice
|
>>
>> All of the above. Do I get a A?
>
>
> How about a gold star?
>
> I'm wondering if this is behind the rash of very poor viewing nights this
> year. Hear's hoping Autumn is much drier and clearer.
You are wondering way TOOO much.
|
| | |
Date: 06 Sep 2006 22:28:15
From: Thomas
Subject: Re: Methane Ice
|
"Richard Adams" <ackthpt@concentric.net > wrote in message
news:1157576022.356482.74000@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
>
> Thomas wrote:
>> The picture is conspicuously similar to the Titan
>> "rocks" photoed by Hyugens.
>>
>> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14696694/
>
> Which picture? I see:
> A. bubbles trapped under ice
> B. ice covered ponds
> C. ice wedges Siberia.
>
Pretty obvious you idiot
|
|
