| |
Main
Date: 29 Nov 2006 21:08:49
From:
Subject: MI5 Persecution: A letter from MI5
|
A letter from MI5
I wrote to the Security Service stating that I wished to bring a complaint against their activities in my life. Here
is their reply; "if you believe you have been the subject of inquiries by the Security Service or that the Security Service
has done anything else in relation to you or your property, you may wish to apply to the Security Service Tribunal who are
able to pursue these points on your behalf."
Please see further items for replies from the Security Service Tribunal, and Interception of Communications Tribunal.
416
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
|
|
| |
Date: 29 Nov 2006 21:32:10
From: Greg Crinklaw
Subject: Re: Law of Orbits
|
Jim Hewitt wrote:
> "Greg Crinklaw" <theskyhoundyoureye@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:5df2f$456d9e78$4212a5ee$8238@TULAROSA.NET...
>> Then why are you asking, may I ask? Every time I've heard this question
>> posed before it was invariably just an excuse to start posting bunk about
>> "plasma physics" pseudoscience.
>
> Gee, now that YOU brought up "plasma physicas"... ;-}
LOL! At least somebody around here isn't so deadly serious!
--
Greg Crinklaw
Astronomical Software Developer
Cloudcroft, New Mexico, USA (33N, 106W, 2700m)
SkyTools: http://www.skyhound.com/cs.html
Observing: http://www.skyhound.com/sh/skyhound.html
Comets: http://www.skyhound.com/sh/comets.html
To reply take out your eye
|
| |
Date: 29 Nov 2006 22:19:28
From: Chris L Peterson
Subject: Re: Law of Orbits
|
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 12:55:25 -0700, "Jim Hewitt"
<jim.hewitt@spamless.hp.com > wrote:
>Gee, now that YOU brought up "plasma physicas"... ;-}
And of course, plasma physics isn't pseudoscience at all.
_________________________________________________
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
http://www.cloudbait.com
|
| | |
Date: 29 Nov 2006 21:34:14
From: Greg Crinklaw
Subject: Re: Law of Orbits
|
Chris L Peterson wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 12:55:25 -0700, "Jim Hewitt"
> <jim.hewitt@spamless.hp.com> wrote:
>
>> Gee, now that YOU brought up "plasma physicas"... ;-}
>
> And of course, plasma physics isn't pseudoscience at all.
You know, what I ought to do, given such an annoying, useless
provocation, is to post a link to one of the plasma-physics
pseudoscience web sites:
Not!
--
Greg Crinklaw
Astronomical Software Developer
Cloudcroft, New Mexico, USA (33N, 106W, 2700m)
SkyTools: http://www.skyhound.com/cs.html
Observing: http://www.skyhound.com/sh/skyhound.html
Comets: http://www.skyhound.com/sh/comets.html
To reply take out your eye
|
| | | |
Date: 30 Nov 2006 06:09:57
From: Chris L Peterson
Subject: Re: Law of Orbits
|
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 21:34:14 -0700, Greg Crinklaw
<theskyhoundyoureye@yahoo.com > wrote:
>You know, what I ought to do, given such an annoying, useless
>provocation, is to post a link to one of the plasma-physics
>pseudoscience web sites:
Sure, why not turn your comments into a self-fullfilling prophecy! <g >
_________________________________________________
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
http://www.cloudbait.com
|
| | | | |
Date: 30 Nov 2006 12:17:07
From: Greg Crinklaw
Subject: Re: Law of Orbits
|
Chris L Peterson wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 21:34:14 -0700, Greg Crinklaw
> <theskyhoundyoureye@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> You know, what I ought to do, given such an annoying, useless
>> provocation, is to post a link to one of the plasma-physics
>> pseudoscience web sites:
>
> Sure, why not turn your comments into a self-fullfilling prophecy! <g>
I'm beginning to think that a protracted pseudo-science debate would
have made for a more interesting "discussion." :-)
--
Greg Crinklaw
Astronomical Software Developer
Cloudcroft, New Mexico, USA (33N, 106W, 2700m)
SkyTools: http://www.skyhound.com/cs.html
Observing: http://www.skyhound.com/sh/skyhound.html
Comets: http://www.skyhound.com/sh/comets.html
To reply take out your eye
|
|
