Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity

astronomy-chat.net
Promoting astronomy discussion.

Main

Date: 04 Nov 2006 04:27:11
From: AJAY SHARMA
Subject: Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity

Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of
Relativity

Einstein=E2=80=99s June 1905, paper is known as Special Theory of
Relativity?
The reference to this paper

In this paper Einstein stated two postulates and here we will discuss
the second postulate.
Part I
Second postulate of Special Relativity as re-stated by
Einstein
(i) =E2=80=9CThe laws by which the states of physical systems undergo chan=
ge
are not affected, whether these changes of state be referred to the one
or the other of two systems of co-ordinates in uniform translatory
motion=E2=80=9D.

It refer to that law of physics are the same, if two systems or
observers are UNIFROM MOTION (zero acceleration).
I t is well known that in this paper Einstein did not give any REFRENCE
to the existing literature, which implies that all this postulate is
his work .
Part II
Galileo is inventor of Second postulate of special Relativity.
Galileo has given second postulate of Special Theory in his book
Galileo=E2=80=99 Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems),
Ref.
Galileo, G. 1632, Dialogues concerning the two chief world systems,
trans. S.Drake, 2nd edition 1967, University of California Press.
For this book was published by Galileo in 1632 and was persecuted for
this book.
Galileo quoted an example in the Dialogue [14] , that if a ship is
moving with uniform velocity then from motion of fish in bottle one can
not judge that whether ship is moving with uniform velocity or at rest.
Thus Galileo stated

=E2=80=9C the mechanical laws of physics are the same for every observer
moving uniformly with constant speed in a straight line".

It refer to that law of physics are the same, if two systems or
observers are UNIFROM MOTION (zero acceleration).
The Einstein has simply re-stated in 1905, the existing in the
literature since 273 years. It is against ethics of research. Einstein
should have given due credit to Galileo. Even at this time it I not too
late to honour Galileo for basics of Special Theory of Relativity.

Ref BOOK 100 Years of E=3Dmc2
https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=3D23_48_324&p=
roducts_id=3D4554
(Book will be published in Dec. 2006, By NOVA Science, New York, USA)

Even Pope John has pardoned Galileo in 1992 for the book, he was
persecuted.

https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=3D23_48_324&p=
roducts_id=3D4554

Second Post
Which mathematical equation from Einstein=E2=80=99s Sep. 1905 derivation
predicts that when Light Energy is emitted, MASS OF BODY INCREASES?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-------------------------

Which mathematical equation from Einstein=E2=80=99s Sep. 1905
derivation predicts that when Light Energy is emitted, MASS OF BODY
INCREASES?

BRIEF

Einstein has speculated E=3D =CE=94m c2 from L=3D =CE=94m c2 in his Sep =
1905
paper. This derivation ( under SPECIAL CONDITIONS) predicts that when
Light Energy is emitted mass of body decreases. It is true. But the
same derivation under general conditions ALSO predicts that when body
emits light energy its mass must increase. It is inconsistent
prediction from Einstein=E2=80=99s derivation and contradiction of Law of
Conservation of Matter or Energy. Einstein did not discuss this aspect
in his work. This aspect is highlighted here.

For details
https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=3D23_48_324&p=
roducts_id=3D4554
( book will be published in Dec 2006 , by NOVA Science in New York ,
USA)

1=2E What is Einstein=E2=80=99s Sep 1905 paper in few words?.

AJAY SHARMA : In this paper Einstein derived a relationship between
Light energy emitted (L) and corresponding decrease in mass (=CE=94m =3D
Mb-Ma ) as
L =3D ( Mb-Ma)c2 or Mb=E2=80=93Ma =3D L/c2
From here Einstein speculated E=3Dmc2
Practically, Einstein considered a body at rest emitting light energy.
Einstein measured the magnitude of light energy in a moving system. And
then he derived a relation between ENERGY EMITTED (L) and DECREASE IN
MASS (=CE=94m) of body.

2=2E Under which conditions Einstein derived this equation L =3D =CE=94mc2 ?

AJAY SHARMA: In Einstein=E2=80=99s derivation , there are four variables i.=
e=2E

(a) Number of light waves emitted by body
(b) Magnitude of energy of light waves
(c) Angles at which waves are emitted by body
(d) Velocity of measuring system w.r.t. body emitting light energy.

Einstein took SPECIAL CONDITIONS to derive L =3Dmc2 and speculated from
it E=3Dmc2

(a) Einstein took , Just two light waves
(b) Energy of light wave is equal
(c) Waves are emitted in opposite directions
(d) Velocity measuring system w.r.t body is in classical region.

Thus under these conditions Einstein=E2=80=99s derivation is OK. The result
is
When body emits light energy, its mass decreases i.e. L =3D ( Mb-Ma)c2

It is correct.

3=2E What about Law of Conservation of momentum?

AJAY SHARMA : After emission of light energy body
(i) May remain at rest.
(ii) May tend to move
(iii) May move apparently or visibly
the law of conservation of momentum is always obeyed. The velocity of
recoil can be calculated by applying equation,
Initial Momentum =3D Final Momentum
The velocity of recoil of gun is determined by this method.
Einstein has considered first case ONLY.

4=2E Which is the mathematical equation obtained by Einstein in Sep 1905
paper which predict that
When light energy is emitted, mass decreases?

AJAY SHARMA: The final equation in this regard is
=CE=94m =3D L /c2
or Ma ( mass of body after emission) =3D Mb ( mass of body before
emission) =E2=80=93 L/c2
Thus mass of body decreases when light energy is emitted.
Einstein has derived this equation under SPECIAL CONDITIONS by
considering two light waves of equal energy( 0.5L each ) , emitted in
opposite directions etc.

5=2E Which is mathematical equation which follows from Einstein=E2=80=99s
derivation and implies that
when Light Energy is Emitted mass of body Increases?

AJAY SHARMA There are numerous equations to this fact
which follows from Einstein=E2=80=99s Sep 1905 derivation and predict that
when
Light Energy is emitted, Mass of Body Increases.
It is contradiction of LAW OF CONSERVATION OF MATTER OR ENERGY.

One case is e.g. when body emits TWO LIGHT WAVES of energies 0.501L
and 0.499L , emitted in OPPOSITE DIRECTIONS. Thus all conditions are
same as that in Einstein=E2=80=99s derivation except magnitude of Light
energy (Einstein has taken energy equal to 0.5L each).

Exactly repeating the calculation as done by Einstein in Sep 1905 paper
we get

=CE=94 m =3D Mass of body before emission (Mb)=E2=80=93Mass of body after e=
mission
(Ma)
=3D =E2=80=93 0.004L/cv + L/c2
(16)
or Ma =3D 0.004L/cv =E2=80=93 L/c2 + Mb
Thus
Mass of body after emission of light energy (Ma)
=3D Positive Quantity + Mass of body before
emission.
Hence mass Increases, when light energy is emitted.

It is not CORRECT prediction FROM Einstein=E2=80=99s derivation.

Third Post
Why Einstein=E2=80=99s Sep 1905 derivation CONTRADICTS Law of
Conservation of Matter?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
--------------------------------------------
Why Einstein=E2=80=99s Sep 1905 derivation CONTRADICTS Law of Conservation
of Matter ?
Part I
Reason for this incorrect deductions.
The central equation in Einstein derivation is very complex .
(i) The basic equation Einstein used is

=E2=84=93* =3D =E2=84=93{1 =E2=80=93 v cos =CF=86/c } /=E2=88=9A[1 =E2=80=
=93 v2 /c2] (1)
=E2=84=93* is light energy measured in moving in frame and =E2=84=93 is ene=
rgy
measured in rest frame. Einstein has given eq.(1) in his June 1905
paper, known as Special Theory of Relativity and called eq.(1) as
Doppler principle for any velocities whatever. Link for paper of
Special Theory of Relativity
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/
(ii) Thus there are many variables in derivation.

(a) Number of light waves
(b) Magnitude of energy of light waves
(c) Angles at which waves are emitted
(d) Velocity of measuring system w.r.t. body emitting light energy.

Einstein took special conditions to derive L =3Dmc2 or E=3Dmc2

(a) Einstein took , Just two light waves
(b) Energy of light wave is equal
(c) Waves are emitted in opposite directions
(d) Velocity measuring system w.r.t body is in classical region.

Thus under these SPECIAL conditions Einstein=E2=80=99s derivation is OK. The
result is
When body emits light energy , its mass decreases.

Part III

Experimentally law of inter conversion of mass energy holds good in all
cases. Theoretically large number of cases is possible (Einstein =E2=80=98s
derivation is valid under these conditions also).
(p) Body may emit large number of waves
(q) The waves may be emitted at different angles.
(r) The waves may have different energies.
(t) Velocity may be in relativistic region.

THUS UNDER GEENRAL CONDITIONS EINTEIN=E2=80=99S SEP. 27 1905 DERIVATION DOES
NOT WORK WELL.
You have commented about sign CHANGE it follows from Einstein=E2=80=99s
derivation, hence it has limitation.
If you think , I have INCORRECTLY induced it , let me know. Write down
the correct equations for the readers.

So Einstein=E2=80=99s Sep 1905 derivation is true under special conditions
only. This is the THEME of the paper.
References
---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-----------------------------------------
If somebody disagree then one can write to Editor Physics Essays
addressing the following issues.

What is Einstein=E2=80=99s Sep 1905 paper?
What are conditions under which it is derived?
What is Planck=E2=80=99s observation regarding it?
Under what conditions experimentally it holds good?
Why Einstein did not generalize the same?
How to generalize it under all conditions?
What is Ajay Sharma=E2=80=99s Interpretation?
How Ajay Sharma=E2=80=99s paper is different from Einstein=E2=80=99s Sep 19=
05
paper.
How Editors/referees who have published it are WRONG?
How Ajay Sharma=E2=80=99s interpretation is incorrect (if it)?
What are the correct interpretations AND EQAUTIONS?
My paper answers all above questions.
It follows from Einstein=E2=80=99s derivation under legitimate conditions,(=
in
some cases) that
when Light Energy is Emitted , mass of body INCREASES.
It is incorrect deduction from Einstein=E2=80=99s derivation.

Part IV
References.

References of Einstein=E2=80=99s work
.
A=2EEinstein, Annalen der Physik 18 (1905) 639-641.
. DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND
UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT?
Weblink is
Einstein=E2=80=99s 27 Sep 1905 paper available at
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/

PartII
References of Ajay Sharma=E2=80=99s work

My work is available at
A=2E Sharma, Physics Essays, 17 (2004) 195-222.
=E2=80=9DThe Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation =EF=81=84E =3D Ac2 =
=EF=81=84M; and
its applications in General physics and Cosmology=E2=80=9D.
http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf

For details
https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=3D23_48_324&p=
roducts_id=3D4554

International Conferences
It has been accepted for presentation over 55 conferences all over the
world
--------------------------------------few of them
1=2E Sharma, A. presented in 19th International Conference on the
Applications of Accelerators in Research and Industry , 20-25
August , 2006 Fort Worth Texas, USA

2. A. Sharma, Abstract Book 38th European Group of Atomic Systems
(
Euro physics Conference) Isachia (Naples) Italy (2006) 53.

3=2E A. Sharma , Abstract Book , A Century After Einstein Physics 2005 ,

10-14 April 2005 ( Organizer Institute of Physics , Bristol )
University of Warwick , ENGLAND

4=2E A. Sharma presented in 5th British gravity Conference , OXFORD
ENGLAND

5=2E A. Sharma,. Proc. Int. Conf. on Computational Methods in
Sciences and Engineering 2003 World Scientific Co. USA ,
(2003) 585.
6=2E A. Sharma, Proc. Int. Conf. on Number, Time, Relativity United
Physical Society of Russian Federation, Moscow, (2004) 81
plus more
--------------------------------------
Book 100 Years of E=3Dmc2
For details
https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=3D23_48_324&p=
roducts_id=3D4554

( book will be published in Dec 2006 , by NOVA Science in New York ,
USA)

AJAY SHARMA 4 NOV 2006

Date: 05 Nov 2006 00:53:38
From: AJAY SHARMA
Subject: Re: Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity

Proginoskes wrote:
> AJAY SHARMA wrote:
> > Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity [.=
.=2E]
>
> And you just found this out?
>
> Next time, pay attention in class.
>
> --- Christopher Heckman
-------------------Ajay Sharma RESPONDS to Greg Hansen-----------
Hechman , you need to go to clas for this see, the original works
Work in existing literature
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_relativity

Einstein's Original work ( handle with care)

Title of Einstein's paper ( June 2006) , which is well known as
SPECILA THEORY OF RELATIVITY
Title of paper
ON THE ELECTRODYNAMICS OF MOVING BODIES.

Print Reference
Einstein, A. Annalen der Physik, 17 891-921 (1905).
Web. Reference
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/

The two postulates are quoted in section

=A7 2. On the Relativity of Lengths and Times
The following reflexions are based on the principle of relativity and
on the principle of the constancy of the velocity of light. These two
principles we define as follows:--
1=2E The laws by which the states of physical systems undergo change
are
not affected, whether these changes of state be referred to the one or
the other of two systems of co-ordinates in uniform translatory motion.

Any ray of light moves in the ``stationary'' system of co-ordinates
with the determined velocity c, whether the ray be emitted by a
stationary or by a moving body.

So whaTever I have written is based upon these facts {original work of

Eintein, not on following interpretations] .
Further references
100 Years of E=3Dmc2
(Book will be published in Dec. 2006 , By NOVA Science, New York,

USA)

https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=3D23_48_3...

AJAY SHARMA 5TH Nov 2006.

Date:
From:
Subject:

Date: 06 Nov 2006 16:03:44
From: Wayne Throop
Subject: Re: Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity

: "AJAY SHARMA" <physics.einstein@gmail.com >
: Till date it is being felt that both the postulates as quoted by
: Einstein , are his creations . It is not. In this regard original
: inventor Galileo is completely forgotten. It is not fair.

Does anybody know why he keeps repeating this, even though by now
it's clear that it's obviously not true?

Can this be a postingbot, that simply fills in a canned screed
whenever it discovers a reply on a threat it's monitoring?
If so, we'll see what reply this query engenders; perhaps
it'll help diagnose the situation.

Wayne Throop throopw@sheol.org http://sheol.org/throopw

Date: 06 Nov 2006 04:04:55
From: AJAY SHARMA
Subject: Re: Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity

Proginoskes wrote:
> AJAY SHARMA wrote:
> > Proginoskes wrote:
> > > AJAY SHARMA wrote:
> > > > Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity [...]
> > >
> > > And you just found this out?
> > >
> > > Next time, pay attention in class.
> >
> > -------------------Ajay Sharma RESPONDS to Greg Hansen-----------
> > Hechman , you need to go to clas for this see, the original works
>
> I was just saying that I learned that Galileo discovered (not invented)
> the second postulate of relativity while I was in high school, in the
> USA. The fact that you're making a big deal about Galileo makes me
> wonder where YOU learned physics.
>
> --- Christopher Heckman
-----------------------------------------------------
Till date it is being felt that both the postulates as
quoted by Einstein , are his creations . It is not.
In this regard original inventor Galileo is completely forgotten. It is
not fair.

Further Einstein did not acknowledge work of any existing scientists.
Einstein should have done the same.
+The principle of constancy of light, relativistic variation of mass,
time dilation, length contractions were all known in Einstein's time.+

He complied all these in German language.
None of the existing scientist who has done the work is given credit .
The reference -section is missing.
This is theme of first part of my post.
Further you have mentioned Einstein also did not quote Newton for
calculus, but everyone knows that Einstein is not associated with
calculus.
I have mentioned the issue of SEOND POSTULATE as Einstein is credited
with SPECIAL THEORY OF RELATIVITY.
See that in Einstein's paper June 1905 there is no section which is
known as STR.
I have discussed all the facts in my papers published in international
journals and conferences.
Also illustrated in the book

100 Years of E=mc2
https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=23_48_324&products_id=4554

Date: 05 Nov 2006 22:09:48
From: Proginoskes
Subject: Re: Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity

AJAY SHARMA wrote:
> Proginoskes wrote:
> > AJAY SHARMA wrote:
> > > Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity [...]
> >
> > And you just found this out?
> >
> > Next time, pay attention in class.
>
> -------------------Ajay Sharma RESPONDS to Greg Hansen-----------
> Hechman , you need to go to clas for this see, the original works

I was just saying that I learned that Galileo discovered (not invented)
the second postulate of relativity while I was in high school, in the
USA. The fact that you're making a big deal about Galileo makes me
wonder where YOU learned physics.

--- Christopher Heckman

Date: 06 Nov 2006 17:46:19
From: AJAY SHARMA
Subject: Re: Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity

karandash2000@yahoo.com wrote:
> rpasken@eas.slu.edu wrote:
> > karandash2000@yahoo.com wrote:
> > > Wayne Throop wrote:
> > > > : "AJAY SHARMA" <physics.einstein@gmail.com>
> > > > : Till date it is being felt that both the postulates as quoted by
> > > > : Einstein , are his creations . It is not. In this regard origin=
al
> > > > : inventor Galileo is completely forgotten. It is not fair.
> > > >
> > > > Does anybody know why he keeps repeating this, even though by now
> > > > it's clear that it's obviously not true?
> > > >
> > > > Can this be a postingbot, that simply fills in a canned screed
> > > > whenever it discovers a reply on a threat it's monitoring?
> > > > If so, we'll see what reply this query engenders; perhaps
> > > > it'll help diagnose the situation.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Wayne Throop throopw@sheol.org http://sheol.org/throopw
> > >
> > > He's definitely a bot, one of the worst imaginable,
> > > look at his spam log.
> >
> >
> > No it is real person, he responds to email. Of course it is more
> > drivel, but there is content based on the email.If you do a google
> > search there is actually a person who claims to be a physicist, but
> > clearly has never had more than elementary school physical science.
>
> Yes, I agree, he's a real person but he has the brain of a bot :-)
> He's only after advertising his "discoveries". Only to take it in the
> chin every time.
------------------------------------------------

It is telling the people thruth

100 Years of E=3Dmc2
(Book will be published in Dec. 2006 , By NOVA Science, New York,
USA)

http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/post/2006/11/galileo-not-einstein-is-in=
ventor-of-second-postulate.htm

1=2E What is E=3Dmc2? What is its importance?
E=3Dmc2 is the most wonderful and significant equation is physics. In
1945 the explosion of atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were base
upon this equation. According to this mass (m) can be converted to
energy (E) and energy can be converted to mass.
Einstein=E2=80=99s 27 Sep 1905 paper available at
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/

2=2E This equation is doing well since past 100 years then where is the
inconsistency?

The inconsistency lies in its mathematical derivation (a method to
obtain a mathematical equation). In his 1905 paper Einstein did not
derive it mathematically but in true sense speculated it. Einstein
earlier derived L =3D mc2 (light energy mass conversion equation). Then
Einstein speculated that what is true for light energy (L) the same is
true for every energy (E). This speculation results in E=3Dmc2, such a
significant equation must be based upon a specific mathematical
derivation and not on speculation.

3=2E Is Einstein=E2=80=99s derivation of L =3Dmc2 correct?

The derivation of L=3Dmc2 is incomplete or true in special conditions
only. Einstein took just handpicked parameters out of numerous
possible, to obtain the equation. Einstein was aware of the reality so
he left in midway after getting the desired result. If all valid
values of parameters are taken, then results are contradictory in
nature.

4=2E What are contradictory results?

Some UNDISCUSSED predictions of Einstein=E2=80=99s 29 Sep. 1905 derivation
blatantly contradict Law of Conservation of Matter. I have
scientifically confirmed the same. No limitation can be bigger than
this in science.

5=2E Was E=3Dmc2 or similar ideas existed before Einstein?

Yes, E=3Dmc2 existed before Einstein. An Italian Olinto de Pretto
published E=3Dmc2 in valid scientific journal Lettere ed Atti, Feb. 1904,
two years before Einstein. But Pretto died in 1921, before its
experimental confirmation in nuclear physics.

6=2E Einstein speculated E=3Dmc2 from L=3Dmc2. What is the problem here?

Firstly derivation of L=3Dmc2 is incomplete or under special conditions
only.
For examples there are many variables in Einstein=E2=80=99s derivation e.g.
number of light waves emitted by body, magnitude of light energy, angle
at which light energy is emitted and relative velocity v. Einstein just
took handpicked values of variables.
If general values of variables are
taken then results are contradictory to experiments.
Secondly Einstein originated E=3Dmc2 on the basis of speculation only
without any conceptual and mathematical basis. Basically Einstein
replaced L by E in equation L=3Dmc2 to get E=3Dmc2.

7=2E Then how did you derive new equation, dE =3DAc2dm (or DE =3D Ac2 DM =
)?

I have derived new equation between mass-energy conservation by simple
calculus method. In dE =3DAc2dm, A is a co-efficient of proportionality
like numerous others in science. It is dimensionless variable.

Sharma June 2004 paper is available
http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf

8=2E How do you compare these two equations?

Firstly dE =3DAc2dm is based upon a conceptual and mathematical
derivation. On the other hand E=3Dmc2 is a speculation, it is bitter
truth. Secondly dE =3DAc2dm is a general equation and E=3Dmc2 is its
special case. Energy emitted by new equation can be less, equal to or
more than predicted by E=3Dmc2.

9=2E How did you justify your equation experimentally?

In Nuclear Physics there are some anomalous results which cannot be
explained by E=3Dmc2 . Like this there are some instances in
astrophysics where my equation is extremely useful.

10. Is your work recognized by international scientific community?

Yes, it is completely recognized, as published in peer review journals.

11 Have you got any recognition certificate from the scientific
community?

The only way to get scientific recognition is that to get the work
published in peer review international journals and conferences. My
research papers are either published in international journals from
America, England and Canada or being published. I have got invitation
from at least 55 International Conferences to present my work. I have
presented my research in international conferences in USA, England,
Germany, Taiwan Ukraine etc. I have invitation from France and Italy
to present my work this year.
[b]Still there ANYONE is welcome to COMMENT on the work in Physics
Essays giving the facts e.g.

What is Einstein=E2=80=99s Sep 1905 paper ?
What are conditions under which it is derived?
Under what conditions experimentally it holds good?
How to generalize it under all conditions?
What is Ajay Sharma=E2=80=99s Interpretation?
How Ajay Sharma=E2=80=99s paper is different from Einstein=E2=80=99s Sep 1=
905
paper
How Ajay Sharma=E2=80=99s interpretation is incorrect (if it)?
What are the correct interpretations?
I HAVE ANSWERS TO ALL QUESTIONS.
If Editor Physics Essays and his Editorial Board finds your
interpretation and published the paper it is OK.
All the references are given below for the purpose.
There may be back door critics but none of the scientists have dared to
write to scientific bodies or journals Editors , that Ajay Sharma=E2=80=99s
work is incorrectly published.

12. Can this work be introduced in Schools and colleges?

Yes my wok is scientifically approved in journal in USA, CANADA and
England. Hence it can be so done by any country. IT IS THE IMPORTANCE
OF THE WORK.

13. How do you counter the opposition of the people which has come in
you your way?
Science is the international language. For this, I take seriously the
logical conclusions of the critics. I completely ignore the
irresponsible critics, as they don=E2=80=99t exist.
The critics when understand the things become my supporters.

14. What about your book, 100 Years of E=3Dmc2?

This book will be published in Dec. 2006
It will bring clear and unbiased picture of the facts.
The contents of book are already approved by expert scientists after
PEER REVIEW and published in international journals and conferences
.The book is meant for general public who is interested in basic
science. This book will status as Newton=E2=80=99s Principia or Galileo=E2=
=80=99s
Dialogue have in science.
Book Link :
https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=3D23_48_324&p=
roducts_id=3D4554

Interviewer Rajesh Thakoor Email mc2.book@gmail.com

References of Einstein=E2=80=99s work
.
A=2EEinstein, Annalen der Physik 18 (1905) 639-641.
. DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND
UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT?
Weblink is
Einstein=E2=80=99s 27 Sep 1905 paper available at
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/

PartII
References of Ajay Sharma=E2=80=99s work

My work is available at
A=2E Sharma, Physics Essays, 17 (2004) 195-222.
=E2=80=9DThe Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation =EF=81=84E =3D Ac2 =
=EF=81=84M; and
its applications in General physics and Cosmology=E2=80=9D.
http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf

For details
100 Years of E=3Dmc2
https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=3D23_48_324&p=
roducts_id=3D4554

International Conferences
It has been accepted for presentation over 55 conferences all over the
world
--------------------------------------few of them
1=2E Sharma, A. presented in 19th International Conference on the
Applications of Accelerators in Research and Industry , 20-25
August , 2006 Fort Worth Texas, USA

2. A. Sharma, Abstract Book 38th European Group of Atomic Systems
(
Euro physics Conference) Isachia (Naples) Italy (2006) 53.

3=2E A. Sharma , Abstract Book , A Century After Einstein Physics 2005 ,

10-14 April 2005 ( Organizer Institute of Physics , Bristol )
University of Warwick , ENGLAND

4=2E A. Sharma presented in 5th British gravity Conference , OXFORD
ENGLAND

5=2E A. Sharma,. Proc. Int. Conf. on Computational Methods in
Sciences and Engineering 2003 World Scientific Co. USA ,
(2003) 585.

6=2E A. Sharma, Proc. Int. Conf. on Number, Time, Relativity United
Physical Society of Russian Federation, Moscow , (2004) 81
plus more
--------------------------------------
Journals
This paper
=E2=80=9DThe Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation =EF=81=84E =3D Ac2 =
=EF=81=84M; and
its applications in General physics and Cosmology=E2=80=9D.
is published in journal
Physics Essays , CANADA
www.physicsessays.com
The paper
The past, present and future of E=3Dmc2
will be published in 2007 Galilean Electrodynamics, Massachusetts,
USA.
In parts it is published in various others journals.
----------------------
Book 100 Years of E=3Dmc2
For details
https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=3D23_48_324&p=
roducts_id=3D4554

Email ajay.sharmaa@rediffmail.com
0091 94183 09989, 0091 177 2804546

Date: 06 Nov 2006 17:41:51
From: tgm
Subject: Re: Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity

rpasken@eas.slu.edu wrote:
> karandash2000@yahoo.com wrote:
> > Wayne Throop wrote:
> > > : "AJAY SHARMA" <physics.einstein@gmail.com>
> > > : Till date it is being felt that both the postulates as quoted by
> > > : Einstein , are his creations . It is not. In this regard original
> > > : inventor Galileo is completely forgotten. It is not fair.
> > >
> > > Does anybody know why he keeps repeating this, even though by now
> > > it's clear that it's obviously not true?
> > >
> > > Can this be a postingbot, that simply fills in a canned screed
> > > whenever it discovers a reply on a threat it's monitoring?
> > > If so, we'll see what reply this query engenders; perhaps
> > > it'll help diagnose the situation.
> > >
> > >
> > > Wayne Throop throopw@sheol.org http://sheol.org/throopw
> >
> > He's definitely a bot, one of the worst imaginable,
> > look at his spam log.
>
>
> No it is real person, he responds to email. Of course it is more
> drivel, but there is content based on the email.If you do a google
> search there is actually a person who claims to be a physicist, but
> clearly has never had more than elementary school physical science.

=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D

rpasken@eas.slu.edu , You have made comments that Momentum is not
Conserved in my PAPER. It is not CORRECT. It is explained in 100 Years
of E=3Dmc2

rpasken@eas.slu.edu Robert Pasken

Department of Earth and AtmosphericSciences
Saint Louis University
3507 Laclede Avenue
St.Louis, MO 63103

See how Momentum is conserved in my paper. All references are given in
the end.

http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/post/2006/11/galileo-not-einstein-is-in=
ventor-of-second-postulate.htm

Part I
General meaning , explained in 11th class Physics.
The law of momentum conservation,
* In an isolated system, the momentum of system must be conserved.*

Mathematically implies that
Initial Momentum =3D Final Momentum
mu=3Dmv (1)
As mass remains same in classical mechanics.
So u=3Dv
which is Newton=E2=80=99s First law of motion.

Application of momentum conservation.
When body emits energy ( in this cases light energy)
then it recoils .Thus it is used to calculate the velocity of recoil.
It can be applied to following two cases.

------ Light bullet fired from TOY Gun, system remains at rest.
( body does not recoil with noticeable velocity, it tends to recoil)
The velocity cam be calculated but may be of the order of
1/100000000000000000000000000000000000 m/s or 10-^40m/s
This case resembles with Einstein=E2=80=99s two waves of equal energy emitt=
ed
in opposite directions.

-----Shot fired from gun, gun moves backward.
the velocity can be calculated from conservation of momentum i.e.
initial momentum =3Dfinal momentum
Vrecoil =3D mv/M ~ 5m/s (say)
Thus after emission of energy BODY MAY REMAIN AT REST OR MOVE, the
Momentum is Conserved. It is basic physics of 11th standard.
If some one does not want to understand this then it his problem.
Einstein did all calculation under Classical conditions of velocity (v
<<c, her v is relative velocity between two systems i.e. system in
which body emits light and second system in which energy is measured.

Part II
The law of conservation of momentum is obeyed in my paper.

https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=3D23_48_324&p=
roducts_id=3D4554

When two waves are emitted. The body recoils with velocity v , with
magnitude of the order of 10^-32 m/s i.e.
V (recoil)=3D1/10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
It can be easily calculated.

When two waves of different energies are emitted. If body emits two
light waves of slightly different energies i.e. 0.5001L and 0.4999L
(Einstein has used light waves of energy 0.5L and 0.5L) in opposite
directions. Now using the law of conservation of momentum, it can be
easily justified that in this case body remains at rest.
Let the body of mass 10kg emits light energy in two waves in visible
region equal to 7.9512=C3=9710^-19 J, this energy corresponds to TWO light
waves in visible region having wavelength 5000=C2=BAA or energy, 2hc/=CE=BB=
or
7=2E9512=C3=9710^-19 J.
Let towards the observer the body emits light energy 0.5001L i.e.
3=2E97639512=C3=9710^-19 J i.e. will have momentum ( p1 =3D E/c)
1=2E32546504=C3=9710^-27 m/s.
Secondly, the body emits light wave of energy 0.4999L i.e.
3=2E97480488=C3=9710^-19 J, away from the observer (=CF=86=3D 180=C2=BA) i.=
e=2E will have
momentum ( p2 =3D E/c) 1.32493496=C3=9710^-27 m/s. Let us assume that when
the body emits light waves of energy and moves (if it actually does)
with velocity Vb , then according to law of conservation of momentum we
get
0 =3D p1 +p2 +MbVb or Vb =3D -(p1 +p2) /Mb =3D =E2=80=935.3=C3=9710^-32 m/s=
(2)
0 =3D p1 +p2 +MbVb or Vb =3D -(p1 +p2) /Mb =3D =E2=80=935.3=C3=9710^-32 m/s=
(3)
Thus conservation of momentum requires that body should move with
velocity =E2=80=935.3=C3=9710^-32 m/s opposite to observer. Thus body will =
tend
to move with velocity 5.3=C3=9710^-32 m/s ( away from the observer) which
is immeasurably small by all means, hence the body remains at rest. Due
to this uniform relative velocity v of the system (=CE=BE, =CE=B7, =CE=B6 )=
will
not change, if body moves then v will vary accordingly.

References of Einstein=E2=80=99s work
.
A=2EEinstein, Annalen der Physik 18 (1905) 639-641.
. DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND
UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT?
Weblink is
Einstein=E2=80=99s 27 Sep 1905 paper available at
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/

PartII
References of Ajay Sharma=E2=80=99s work

My work is available at
A=2E Sharma, Physics Essays, 17 (2004) 195-222.
=E2=80=9DThe Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation =EF=81=84E =3D Ac2 =
=EF=81=84M; and
its applications in General physics and Cosmology=E2=80=9D.
http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf

For details
100 Years of E=3Dmc2
https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=3D23_48_324&p=
roducts_id=3D4554

International Conferences
It has been accepted for presentation over 55 conferences all over the
world
--------------------------------------few of them
1=2E Sharma, A. presented in 19th International Conference on the
Applications of Accelerators in Research and Industry , 20-25
August , 2006 Fort Worth Texas, USA

2. A. Sharma, Abstract Book 38th European Group of Atomic Systems
(
Euro physics Conference) Isachia (Naples) Italy (2006) 53.

3=2E A. Sharma , Abstract Book , A Century After Einstein Physics 2005 ,

10-14 April 2005 ( Organizer Institute of Physics , Bristol )
University of Warwick , ENGLAND

4=2E A. Sharma presented in 5th British gravity Conference , OXFORD
ENGLAND

5=2E A. Sharma,. Proc. Int. Conf. on Computational Methods in
Sciences and Engineering 2003 World Scientific Co. USA ,
(2003) 585.

6=2E A. Sharma, Proc. Int. Conf. on Number, Time, Relativity United
Physical Society of Russian Federation, Moscow , (2004) 81
plus more
--------------------------------------
Journals
This paper
=E2=80=9DThe Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation =EF=81=84E =3D Ac2 =
=EF=81=84M; and
its applications in General physics and Cosmology=E2=80=9D.
is published in journal
Physics Essays , CANADA
www.physicsessays.com
The paper
The past, present and future of E=3Dmc2
will be published in 2007 Galilean Electrodynamics, Massachusetts,
USA.
In parts it is published in various others journals.
----------------------
Book 100 Years of E=3Dmc2
For details
https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=3D23_48_324&p=
roducts_id=3D4554

Email ajay.sharmaa@rediffmail.com
0091 94183 09989, 0091 177 2804546

Date: 06 Nov 2006 16:35:45
From:
Subject: Re: Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity

Date: 06 Nov 2006 14:22:59
From:
Subject: Re: Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity

karandash2000@yahoo.com wrote:
> Wayne Throop wrote:
> > : "AJAY SHARMA" <physics.einstein@gmail.com>
> > : Till date it is being felt that both the postulates as quoted by
> > : Einstein , are his creations . It is not. In this regard original
> > : inventor Galileo is completely forgotten. It is not fair.
> >
> > Does anybody know why he keeps repeating this, even though by now
> > it's clear that it's obviously not true?
> >
> > Can this be a postingbot, that simply fills in a canned screed
> > whenever it discovers a reply on a threat it's monitoring?
> > If so, we'll see what reply this query engenders; perhaps
> > it'll help diagnose the situation.
> >
> >
> > Wayne Throop throopw@sheol.org http://sheol.org/throopw
>
> He's definitely a bot, one of the worst imaginable,
> look at his spam log.

No it is real person, he responds to email. Of course it is more
drivel, but there is content based on the email.If you do a google
search there is actually a person who claims to be a physicist, but
clearly has never had more than elementary school physical science.

Date: 06 Nov 2006 13:53:03
From:
Subject: Re: Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity

Wayne Throop wrote:
> : "AJAY SHARMA" <physics.einstein@gmail.com>
> : Till date it is being felt that both the postulates as quoted by
> : Einstein , are his creations . It is not. In this regard original
> : inventor Galileo is completely forgotten. It is not fair.
>
> Does anybody know why he keeps repeating this, even though by now
> it's clear that it's obviously not true?
>
> Can this be a postingbot, that simply fills in a canned screed
> whenever it discovers a reply on a threat it's monitoring?
> If so, we'll see what reply this query engenders; perhaps
> it'll help diagnose the situation.
>
>
> Wayne Throop throopw@sheol.org http://sheol.org/throopw

He's definitely a bot, one of the worst imaginable,
look at his spam log.

Date: 06 Nov 2006 13:51:37
From:
Subject: Re: Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity

Wayne Throop wrote:
> : "AJAY SHARMA" <physics.einstein@gmail.com>
> : Till date it is being felt that both the postulates as quoted by
> : Einstein , are his creations . It is not. In this regard original
> : inventor Galileo is completely forgotten. It is not fair.
>
> Does anybody know why he keeps repeating this, even though by now
> it's clear that it's obviously not true?
>
> Can this be a postingbot, that simply fills in a canned screed
> whenever it discovers a reply on a threat it's monitoring?
> If so, we'll see what reply this query engenders; perhaps
> it'll help diagnose the situation.
>
>
> Wayne Throop throopw@sheol.org http://sheol.org/throopw

He's advertising his upcoming self-published book.
You can get a sample of his errors here:

http://gase1234.tripod.com/ASharma.pdf

The total number of errors would fill a whole book.