| |
Main
Date: 13 Sep 2006 23:40:40
From: Protagonist
Subject: Einstein first wife Mileva
|
PBS documentary shows, first wife Mileva, a scientist was the brain and
collaborator in Einstein big ideas, that later won him the Nobel prize!
JS
Excerpts from Chapter Eight
"How happy and proud I will be, when we two together have
victoriously led our work on relative motion to an end!"-- Albert Einstein
. . .In 1905, several articles bearing the name of Albert Einstein
appeared in a German physics journal, Annalen der Physik. The most
fateful among these, was a paper entitled Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter
Körper; von A. Einstein, Einstein's supposedly breakthrough paper on the
"principle of relativity". Though it was perhaps submitted as coauthored
by Mileva Einstein-Marity and Albert Einstein, or solely by Mileva
Einstein-Marity, Albert's name appeared in the journal as the exclusive
author of their work285 . . . .
Abram Fedorovich Joffe (Ioffe) recounts that the paper was signed
"Einstein-Marity". "Marity" is a variant of the Serbian "Maric",
Mileva's maiden name. Joffe, who had seen the original 1905 manuscript,
is on record as stating,
"For Physics, and especially for the Physics of my
generation--that of Einstein's contemporaries, Einstein's entrance into
the arena of science is unforgettable. In 1905, three articles appeared
in the 'Annalen der Physik', which began three very important branches
of 20th Century Physics. Those were the theory of Brownian movement, the
theory of the photoelectric effect and the theory of relativity. The
author of these articles--an unknown person at that time, was a
bureaucrat at the Patent Office in Bern, Einstein-Marity (Marity--the
maiden name of his wife, which by Swiss custom is added to the husband's
family name)."286. . .
. . . Joffe's statements appeared fifty years after he had read the
1905 papers. It stuck with him all those many years that the papers were
indelibly signed "Einstein-Marity". How could Joffe have known that
Mileva Maric went by the name of Einstein-Marity, if the name had not
appeared on the 1905 papers? Joffe could not have known that Albert went
by the name of "Einstein-Marity", because Albert Einstein never did. . .
. . . There is no Swiss custom by which the husband automatically
adds his wife's maiden name to his, and even if there were, neither
Albert nor Mileva were Swiss. Albert Einstein never signed his name
"Einstein-Marity". Swiss law permits the male, the female, or both, to
use a double last name, but this must be declared before the marriage,
and it was Mileva, not Albert, who opted for the last name
"Einstein-Marity". A married person may use the hyphenated "Allianzname"
in everyday use, but it was Mileva who went by "Einstein-Marity", not
Albert. Albert signed his marriage records simply "Einstein". Mileva's
death notice reads "Einstein-Marity".
Evan Harris Walker, who argued that Mileva was co-author, or sole
author, of the 1905 papers, quoted some of Albert's words, as found in
The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, and bear in mind that the vast
majority of Mileva's letters to Albert were destroyed, with there being
no more likely reasons for their destruction, than to hide her
contribution and the fact that the works were unoriginal,
"I find statements in 13 of [Albert's] 43 letters to [Mileva]
that refer to her research or to an ongoing collaborative effort -- for
example, in document 74, 'another method which has similarities with yours.'
In document 75, Albert writes: 'I am also looking forward very
much to our new work. You must now continue with your investigation.' In
document 79, he says, 'we will send it to Wiedermann's Annalen.' In
document 96, he refers to 'our investigations'; in document 101, to 'our
theory of molecular forces.' In document 107, he tells her: 'Prof. Weber
is very nice to me. . . I gave him our paper.'"298
. . .Why did the Nobel commitee not award Einstein the Nobel Prize
for his work on relativity theory? Could it have been that all who were
familiar with the facts, knew that Einstein did not originate the major
concepts behind relativity theory?
. . .Mileva and Albert had coauthored papers before299 and Albert
had assumed credit for that which Mileva had accomplished.300 Senta
Troemel-Ploetz presented a thorough account of Albert's shameless
appropriation of Mileva's work and of Mileva's acquiescence.301
. . .Why didn't Mileva come forward with the fact that she was the
one who had written the work, if in fact she had? Did Albert buy
Mileva's silence? Even if he had, was there more to hold Mileva back
from exposing Albert, than the desperate need for monies?
. . . Serbian women had little chance at fame in those days, other
than as ornaments attached to their husbands' arms. Tesla, a Serb born
in Croatia, was unfairly treated in the West. What chance did Mileva
stand? Albert was cruel to Mileva. Her self-confidence may have been
destroyed. Albert once demanded in writing that Mileva obey his cruel
and degrading orders, in a letter which can only be described as
shocking and revolting.327 If Mileva had hoped that Albert would someday
acknowledge her, she was mistaken.
http://womenshistory.about.com/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm?site=http://home.comcast.net/%7Extxinc/mileva.htm
|
|
| |
Date: 14 Sep 2006 19:10:18
From: physics.einstein@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Einstein first wife Mileva
|
Protagonist wrote:
> PBS documentary shows, first wife Mileva, a scientist was the brain and
> collaborator in Einstein big ideas, that later won him the Nobel prize!
> JS
>
>
> Excerpts from Chapter Eight
>
> "How happy and proud I will be, when we two together have
> victoriously led our work on relative motion to an end!"-- Albert Einstein
>
> . . .In 1905, several articles bearing the name of Albert Einstein
> appeared in a German physics journal, Annalen der Physik. The most
> fateful among these, was a paper entitled Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter
> K=C3=B6rper; von A. Einstein, Einstein's supposedly breakthrough paper on=
the
> "principle of relativity". Though it was perhaps submitted as coauthored
> by Mileva Einstein-Marity and Albert Einstein, or solely by Mileva
> Einstein-Marity, Albert's name appeared in the journal as the exclusive
> author of their work285 . . . .
>
> Abram Fedorovich Joffe (Ioffe) recounts that the paper was signed
> "Einstein-Marity". "Marity" is a variant of the Serbian "Maric",
> Mileva's maiden name. Joffe, who had seen the original 1905 manuscript,
> is on record as stating,
>
> "For Physics, and especially for the Physics of my
> generation--that of Einstein's contemporaries, Einstein's entrance into
> the arena of science is unforgettable. In 1905, three articles appeared
> in the 'Annalen der Physik', which began three very important branches
> of 20th Century Physics. Those were the theory of Brownian movement, the
> theory of the photoelectric effect and the theory of relativity. The
> author of these articles--an unknown person at that time, was a
> bureaucrat at the Patent Office in Bern, Einstein-Marity (Marity--the
> maiden name of his wife, which by Swiss custom is added to the husband's
> family name)."286. . .
>
> . . . Joffe's statements appeared fifty years after he had read the
> 1905 papers. It stuck with him all those many years that the papers were
> indelibly signed "Einstein-Marity". How could Joffe have known that
> Mileva Maric went by the name of Einstein-Marity, if the name had not
> appeared on the 1905 papers? Joffe could not have known that Albert went
> by the name of "Einstein-Marity", because Albert Einstein never did. . .
>
> . . . There is no Swiss custom by which the husband automatically
> adds his wife's maiden name to his, and even if there were, neither
> Albert nor Mileva were Swiss. Albert Einstein never signed his name
> "Einstein-Marity". Swiss law permits the male, the female, or both, to
> use a double last name, but this must be declared before the marriage,
> and it was Mileva, not Albert, who opted for the last name
> "Einstein-Marity". A married person may use the hyphenated "Allianzname"
> in everyday use, but it was Mileva who went by "Einstein-Marity", not
> Albert. Albert signed his marriage records simply "Einstein". Mileva's
> death notice reads "Einstein-Marity".
>
> Evan Harris Walker, who argued that Mileva was co-author, or sole
> author, of the 1905 papers, quoted some of Albert's words, as found in
> The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, and bear in mind that the vast
> majority of Mileva's letters to Albert were destroyed, with there being
> no more likely reasons for their destruction, than to hide her
> contribution and the fact that the works were unoriginal,
>
> "I find statements in 13 of [Albert's] 43 letters to [Mileva]
> that refer to her research or to an ongoing collaborative effort -- for
> example, in document 74, 'another method which has similarities with your=
s=2E'
>
> In document 75, Albert writes: 'I am also looking forward very
> much to our new work. You must now continue with your investigation.' In
> document 79, he says, 'we will send it to Wiedermann's Annalen.' In
> document 96, he refers to 'our investigations'; in document 101, to 'our
> theory of molecular forces.' In document 107, he tells her: 'Prof. Weber
> is very nice to me. . . I gave him our paper.'"298
>
> . . .Why did the Nobel commitee not award Einstein the Nobel Prize
> for his work on relativity theory? Could it have been that all who were
> familiar with the facts, knew that Einstein did not originate the major
> concepts behind relativity theory?
>
> . . .Mileva and Albert had coauthored papers before299 and Albert
> had assumed credit for that which Mileva had accomplished.300 Senta
> Troemel-Ploetz presented a thorough account of Albert's shameless
> appropriation of Mileva's work and of Mileva's acquiescence.301
>
> . . .Why didn't Mileva come forward with the fact that she was the
> one who had written the work, if in fact she had? Did Albert buy
> Mileva's silence? Even if he had, was there more to hold Mileva back
> from exposing Albert, than the desperate need for monies?
>
> . . . Serbian women had little chance at fame in those days, other
> than as ornaments attached to their husbands' arms. Tesla, a Serb born
> in Croatia, was unfairly treated in the West. What chance did Mileva
> stand? Albert was cruel to Mileva. Her self-confidence may have been
> destroyed. Albert once demanded in writing that Mileva obey his cruel
> and degrading orders, in a letter which can only be described as
> shocking and revolting.327 If Mileva had hoped that Albert would someday
> acknowledge her, she was mistaken.
> http://womenshistory.about.com/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm?site=3Dhttp://home.=
comcast.net/%7Extxinc/mileva.htm
Einstein's life and work both are musterious and based upon
intuition. Her relationship and dealing with Mileva has been
mysterious. BOTH ASPECTS NEED STUDY AND RE-STUDY. Einstein even
speculated E=3Dmc2 rather deriving the same logically.
Einstein speculated E =3Dmc2 from L =3Dmc2 in Sep. 1905 : Ajay Sharma
Einstein did not derive E=3Dmc2 in 1905 , but speculated it from Light
energy mass equation L =3Dmc2. In derivation of L=3Dmc2 Einstein used
equation
l* =3D l{1 =E2=80=93 v/c cos =CF=86 } /=E2=88=9A[1 =E2=80=93 v2 /c2]
which he has given in June 1905 paper.
Using this as central equation Einstein obtained equation
L=3Dmc2 (1)
under special conditions (when emits TWO light wave, of equal
MAGNITUDE, exactly in opposite directions, relative velocity v is in
classical region).
Then Einstein replaced L (light energy ) by E (( every energy i.e.
light energy, heat energy ,sound energy , electrical energy , energy in
form of invisible radiations etc ) and thus SPECULATED
E=3Dmc2. (2)
Such an important equation ( INTER CONVERSION OF MASS =E2=80=93ENERGY )
should have valid and well defined derivation.
When it is done then result is
dE =3DAc2 dm
when A is coefficient of proportionality like numerous existing in
physics.
References of Einstein=E2=80=99s work
.
A=2EEinstein, Annalen der Physik 18 (1905) 639-641. .
Weblink is
Einstein=E2=80=99s 27 Sep 1905 paper available at
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/
PartII
References of Ajay Sharma=E2=80=99s work
My work is available at
http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf
For details
https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=3D23_48_324&p=
roducts_id=3D4554
International Conferences
It has been accepted for presentation over 55 conferences all over the
world
--------------------------------------few of them
1=2E Sharma, A. presented in 19th International Conference on the
Applications of Accelerators in Research and Industry , 20-25
August , 2006 Fort Worth Texas, USA
2. A. Sharma, Abstract Book 38th European Group of Atomic Systems
(
Euro physics Conference) Isachia (Naples) Italy (2006) 53.
3=2E A. Sharma , Abstract Book , A Century After Einstein Physics 2005 ,
10-14 April 2005 ( Organizer Institute of Physics , Bristol )
University of Warwick , ENGLAND
4=2E A. Sharma presented in 5th British gravity Conference , OXFORD
ENGLAND
5=2E A. Sharma,. Proc. Int. Conf. on Computational Methods in
Sciences and Engineering 2003 World Scientific Co. USA ,
(2003) 585.
6=2E A. Sharma, Proc. Int. Conf. on Number, Time, Relativity United
Physical Society of Russian Federation, Moscow , (2004) 81
plus more
--------------------------------------
Journals
This paper
=E2=80=9DThe Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation =EF=81=84E =3D Ac2 =
=EF=81=84M; and
its applications in General physics and Cosmology=E2=80=9D.
is published in journal
A=2E Sharma, Physics Essays, 17 (2004) 195-222.
Physics Essays , CANADA
www.physicsessays.com
The paper
The past ,present and future of E=3Dmc2
will be published in 2007 Galilean Electrodynamics, Massachusetts,
USA.
In parts it is published in various others journals.
----------------------
Book 100 Years of E=3Dmc2
For details
https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=3D23_48_324&p=
roducts_id=3D4554
|
| | |
Date: 17 Sep 2006 11:20:27
From: Protagonist
Subject: Re: Einstein first wife Mileva
|
physics.einstein@gmail.com wrote:
> Protagonist wrote:
>> PBS documentary shows, first wife Mileva, a scientist was the brain and
>> collaborator in Einstein big ideas, that later won him the Nobel prize!
>> JS
>>
>>
>> Excerpts from Chapter Eight
>>
>> "How happy and proud I will be, when we two together have
>> victoriously led our work on relative motion to an end!"-- Albert Einstein
>>
>> . . .In 1905, several articles bearing the name of Albert Einstein
>> appeared in a German physics journal, Annalen der Physik. The most
>> fateful among these, was a paper entitled Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter
>> Körper; von A. Einstein, Einstein's supposedly breakthrough paper on the
> Einstein's life and work both are musterious and based upon
> intuition. Her relationship and dealing with Mileva has been
> mysterious. BOTH ASPECTS NEED STUDY AND RE-STUDY. Einstein even
> speculated E=mc2 rather deriving the same logically.
>
> Einstein speculated E =mc2 from L =mc2 in Sep. 1905 : Ajay Sharma
>
> Einstein did not derive E=mc2 in 1905 , but speculated it from Light
> energy mass equation L =mc2. In derivation of L=mc2 Einstein used
> equation
>
> l* = l{1 – v/c cos φ } /√[1 – v2 /c2]
>
> which he has given in June 1905 paper.
> Using this as central equation Einstein obtained equation
> L=mc2 (1)
> under special conditions (when emits TWO light wave, of equal
> MAGNITUDE, exactly in opposite directions, relative velocity v is in
> classical region).
> Then Einstein replaced L (light energy ) by E (( every energy i.e.
> light energy, heat energy ,sound energy , electrical energy , energy in
> form of invisible radiations etc ) and thus SPECULATED
> E=mc2. (2)
> Such an important equation ( INTER CONVERSION OF MASS –ENERGY )
> should have valid and well defined derivation.
> When it is done then result is
> dE =Ac2 dm
> when A is coefficient of proportionality like numerous existing in
> physics.
>
> References of Einstein’s work
> .
> A.Einstein, Annalen der Physik 18 (1905) 639-641. .
> Weblink is
> Einstein’s 27 Sep 1905 paper available at
>
Let's not forget that another goym did publish e=mv*2 two years before
than the Einstein/Maric duo.
In 1903 northern italian industrialist and calculus professor Olinto de
Pretto (vicentine-venetian) did publish an anticipation of the
relativity theory in the scientifical paper Atte.
Einstein had a perfect knowledge of the italian language and was aware
of the scientific works that were produced in Italy, thanks to the
contacts with his venetian italian siwss friend Michele Besso.
In this llink from an american university both Maric and De Pretto get
their credits.
http://www.msu.edu/~mccaske1/writing/eresp.htm.
|
| | | |
Date: 21 Sep 2006 00:30:54
From: Matu
Subject: Re: Einstein first wife Mileva
|
Protagonist wrote:
> physics.einstein@gmail.com wrote:
> > Protagonist wrote:
> >> PBS documentary shows, first wife Mileva, a scientist was the brain and
> >> collaborator in Einstein big ideas, that later won him the Nobel prize!
> >> JS
> >>
> >>
> >> Excerpts from Chapter Eight
> >>
> >> "How happy and proud I will be, when we two together have
> >> victoriously led our work on relative motion to an end!"-- Albert Einstein
> >>
> >> . . .In 1905, several articles bearing the name of Albert Einstein
> >> appeared in a German physics journal, Annalen der Physik. The most
> >> fateful among these, was a paper entitled Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter
> >> Körper; von A. Einstein, Einstein's supposedly breakthrough paper on the
>
> > Einstein's life and work both are musterious and based upon
> > intuition. Her relationship and dealing with Mileva has been
> > mysterious. BOTH ASPECTS NEED STUDY AND RE-STUDY. Einstein even
> > speculated E=mc2 rather deriving the same logically.
> >
> > Einstein speculated E =mc2 from L =mc2 in Sep. 1905 : Ajay Sharma
> >
> > Einstein did not derive E=mc2 in 1905 , but speculated it from Light
> > energy mass equation L =mc2. In derivation of L=mc2 Einstein used
> > equation
> >
> > l* = l{1 – v/c cos φ } /√[1 – v2 /c2]
> >
> > which he has given in June 1905 paper.
> > Using this as central equation Einstein obtained equation
> > L=mc2 (1)
> > under special conditions (when emits TWO light wave, of equal
> > MAGNITUDE, exactly in opposite directions, relative velocity v is in
> > classical region).
> > Then Einstein replaced L (light energy ) by E (( every energy i.e.
> > light energy, heat energy ,sound energy , electrical energy , energy in
> > form of invisible radiations etc ) and thus SPECULATED
> > E=mc2. (2)
> > Such an important equation ( INTER CONVERSION OF MASS –ENERGY )
> > should have valid and well defined derivation.
> > When it is done then result is
> > dE =Ac2 dm
> > when A is coefficient of proportionality like numerous existing in
> > physics.
> >
> > References of Einstein’s work
> > .
> > A.Einstein, Annalen der Physik 18 (1905) 639-641. .
> > Weblink is
> > Einstein’s 27 Sep 1905 paper available at
> >
>
> Let's not forget that another goym did publish e=mv*2 two years before
> than the Einstein/Maric duo.
>
> In 1903 northern italian industrialist and calculus professor Olinto de
> Pretto (vicentine-venetian) did publish an anticipation of the
> relativity theory in the scientifical paper Atte.
>
> Einstein had a perfect knowledge of the italian language and was aware
> of the scientific works that were produced in Italy, thanks to the
> contacts with his venetian italian siwss friend Michele Besso.
>
> In this llink from an american university both Maric and De Pretto get
> their credits.
>
> http://www.msu.edu/~mccaske1/writing/eresp.htm.
You are such a BSD artista! Congradulista!
|
| |
Date: 21 Sep 2006 00:41:05
From: Matu
Subject: Re: Einstein first wife Mileva
|
Protagonist wrote:
> PBS documentary shows, first wife Mileva, a scientist was the brain and
> collaborator in Einstein big ideas, that later won him the Nobel prize!
> JS
>
> Excerpts from Chapter Eight
>
> "How happy and proud I will be, when we two together have
> victoriously led our work on relative motion to an end!"-- Albert Einstein
has been well explained by none less than Hans Albert Einstein (and his first
wife who knew Mileav's family)!
>
>
> . . .In 1905, several articles bearing the name of Albert Einstein
> appeared in a German physics journal, Annalen der Physik. The most
> fateful among these, was a paper entitled Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter
> Körper; von A. Einstein, Einstein's supposedly breakthrough paper on the
> "principle of relativity". Though it was perhaps submitted as coauthored
> by Mileva Einstein-Marity and Albert Einstein, or solely by Mileva
> Einstein-Marity, Albert's name appeared in the journal as the exclusive
> author of their work285 . . . .
Is this an allegation on you part or what? Please give us proof of your assertion.
This matter has been handled over and over by credible historians. The
Einstein-Marity issue has been explained 10,000 times! Do some reading.
>
>
> Abram Fedorovich Joffe (Ioffe) recounts that the paper was signed
> "Einstein-Marity". "Marity" is a variant of the Serbian "Maric",
> Mileva's maiden name. Joffe, who had seen the original 1905 manuscript,
> is on record as stating,
Bullshit. Had nothing more to do than with requirements of publication under Swiss citisenship. You are
quoting a Russian newspaper artikle, by
the way.
>
>
> "For Physics, and especially for the Physics of my
> generation--that of Einstein's contemporaries, Einstein's entrance into
> the arena of science is unforgettable. In 1905, three articles appeared
> in the 'Annalen der Physik', which began three very important branches
> of 20th Century Physics. Those were the theory of Brownian movement, the
> theory of the photoelectric effect and the theory of relativity. The
> author of these articles--an unknown person at that time, was a
> bureaucrat at the Patent Office in Bern, Einstein-Marity (Marity--the
> maiden name of his wife, which by Swiss custom is added to the husband's
> family name)."286. . .
>
> . . . Joffe's statements appeared fifty years after he had read the
> 1905 papers. It stuck with him all those many years that the papers were
> indelibly signed "Einstein-Marity". How could Joffe have known that
> Mileva Maric went by the name of Einstein-Marity, if the name had not
> appeared on the 1905 papers? Joffe could not have known that Albert went
> by the name of "Einstein-Marity", because Albert Einstein never did. . .
>
> . . . There is no Swiss custom by which the husband automatically
> adds his wife's maiden name to his, and even if there were, neither
> Albert nor Mileva were Swiss. Albert Einstein never signed his name
> "Einstein-Marity". Swiss law permits the male, the female, or both, to
> use a double last name, but this must be declared before the marriage,
> and it was Mileva, not Albert, who opted for the last name
> "Einstein-Marity". A married person may use the hyphenated "Allianzname"
> in everyday use, but it was Mileva who went by "Einstein-Marity", not
> Albert. Albert signed his marriage records simply "Einstein". Mileva's
> death notice reads "Einstein-Marity".
>
It had nothing to do with this!
>
> Evan Harris Walker, who argued that Mileva was co-author, or sole
> author, of the 1905 papers, quoted some of Albert's words, as found in
> The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, and bear in mind that the vast
> majority of Mileva's letters to Albert were destroyed, with there being
> no more likely reasons for their destruction, than to hide her
> contribution and the fact that the works were unoriginal,
You really need to do some current reading! Walker changed his whole
opinion and regrets ever implying (what you imply).
>
>
> "I find statements in 13 of [Albert's] 43 letters to [Mileva]
> that refer to her research or to an ongoing collaborative effort -- for
> example, in document 74, 'another method which has similarities with yours.'
>
> In document 75, Albert writes: 'I am also looking forward very
> much to our new work. You must now continue with your investigation.' In
> document 79, he says, 'we will send it to Wiedermann's Annalen.' In
> document 96, he refers to 'our investigations'; in document 101, to 'our
> theory of molecular forces.' In document 107, he tells her: 'Prof. Weber
> is very nice to me. . . I gave him our paper.'"298
>
> . . .Why did the Nobel commitee not award Einstein the Nobel Prize
> for his work on relativity theory? Could it have been that all who were
> familiar with the facts, knew that Einstein did not originate the major
> concepts behind relativity theory?
>
> . . .Mileva and Albert had coauthored papers before299 and Albert
> had assumed credit for that which Mileva had accomplished.300 Senta
> Troemel-Ploetz presented a thorough account of Albert's shameless
> appropriation of Mileva's work and of Mileva's acquiescence.301
>
> . . .Why didn't Mileva come forward with the fact that she was the
> one who had written the work, if in fact she had? Did Albert buy
> Mileva's silence? Even if he had, was there more to hold Mileva back
> from exposing Albert, than the desperate need for monies?
>
> . . . Serbian women had little chance at fame in those days, other
> than as ornaments attached to their husbands' arms. Tesla, a Serb born
> in Croatia, was unfairly treated in the West. What chance did Mileva
> stand? Albert was cruel to Mileva. Her self-confidence may have been
> destroyed. Albert once demanded in writing that Mileva obey his cruel
> and degrading orders, in a letter which can only be described as
> shocking and revolting.327 If Mileva had hoped that Albert would someday
> acknowledge her, she was mistaken.
> http://womenshistory.about.com/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm?site=http://home.comcast.net/%7Extxinc/mileva.htm
You are an idiot! You do not even cover the BEST evidence of collaboration
between Mileva and Albert. I absolutely will not even be specific here for fear
you would carry that and claim things further untrue. Get a life!
|
| |
Date: 27 Sep 2006 03:15:22
From: Matu
Subject: Re: Einstein first wife Mileva
|
Protagonist wrote:
> PBS documentary shows, first wife Mileva, a scientist was the brain and
> collaborator in Einstein big ideas, that later won him the Nobel prize!
> JS
So - Albert gave her the money from the prise. I will bet you didnt know that! We have a saying in
Texas: 'mouth a flappin ears a clappin and
closed'.
>
>
> Excerpts from Chapter Eight
>
> "How happy and proud I will be, when we two together have
> victoriously led our work on relative motion to an end!"-- Albert Einstein
>
> . . .In 1905, several articles bearing the name of Albert Einstein
> appeared in a German physics journal, Annalen der Physik. The most
> fateful among these, was a paper entitled Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter
> Körper; von A. Einstein, Einstein's supposedly breakthrough paper on the
> "principle of relativity". Though it was perhaps submitted as coauthored
> by Mileva Einstein-Marity and Albert Einstein, or solely by Mileva
> Einstein-Marity, Albert's name appeared in the journal as the exclusive
> author of their work285 . . . .
>
> Abram Fedorovich Joffe (Ioffe) recounts that the paper was signed
> "Einstein-Marity". "Marity" is a variant of the Serbian "Maric",
> Mileva's maiden name. Joffe, who had seen the original 1905 manuscript,
> is on record as stating,
>
> "For Physics, and especially for the Physics of my
> generation--that of Einstein's contemporaries, Einstein's entrance into
> the arena of science is unforgettable. In 1905, three articles appeared
> in the 'Annalen der Physik', which began three very important branches
> of 20th Century Physics. Those were the theory of Brownian movement, the
> theory of the photoelectric effect and the theory of relativity. The
> author of these articles--an unknown person at that time, was a
> bureaucrat at the Patent Office in Bern, Einstein-Marity (Marity--the
> maiden name of his wife, which by Swiss custom is added to the husband's
> family name)."286. . .
>
> . . . Joffe's statements appeared fifty years after he had read the
> 1905 papers. It stuck with him all those many years that the papers were
> indelibly signed "Einstein-Marity". How could Joffe have known that
> Mileva Maric went by the name of Einstein-Marity, if the name had not
> appeared on the 1905 papers? Joffe could not have known that Albert went
> by the name of "Einstein-Marity", because Albert Einstein never did. . .
>
> . . . There is no Swiss custom by which the husband automatically
> adds his wife's maiden name to his, and even if there were, neither
> Albert nor Mileva were Swiss. Albert Einstein never signed his name
> "Einstein-Marity". Swiss law permits the male, the female, or both, to
> use a double last name, but this must be declared before the marriage,
> and it was Mileva, not Albert, who opted for the last name
> "Einstein-Marity". A married person may use the hyphenated "Allianzname"
> in everyday use, but it was Mileva who went by "Einstein-Marity", not
> Albert. Albert signed his marriage records simply "Einstein". Mileva's
> death notice reads "Einstein-Marity".
>
> Evan Harris Walker, who argued that Mileva was co-author, or sole
> author, of the 1905 papers, quoted some of Albert's words, as found in
> The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, and bear in mind that the vast
> majority of Mileva's letters to Albert were destroyed, with there being
> no more likely reasons for their destruction, than to hide her
> contribution and the fact that the works were unoriginal,
>
> "I find statements in 13 of [Albert's] 43 letters to [Mileva]
> that refer to her research or to an ongoing collaborative effort -- for
> example, in document 74, 'another method which has similarities with yours.'
>
> In document 75, Albert writes: 'I am also looking forward very
> much to our new work. You must now continue with your investigation.' In
> document 79, he says, 'we will send it to Wiedermann's Annalen.' In
> document 96, he refers to 'our investigations'; in document 101, to 'our
> theory of molecular forces.' In document 107, he tells her: 'Prof. Weber
> is very nice to me. . . I gave him our paper.'"298
>
> . . .Why did the Nobel commitee not award Einstein the Nobel Prize
> for his work on relativity theory? Could it have been that all who were
> familiar with the facts, knew that Einstein did not originate the major
> concepts behind relativity theory?
>
> . . .Mileva and Albert had coauthored papers before299 and Albert
> had assumed credit for that which Mileva had accomplished.300 Senta
> Troemel-Ploetz presented a thorough account of Albert's shameless
> appropriation of Mileva's work and of Mileva's acquiescence.301
>
> . . .Why didn't Mileva come forward with the fact that she was the
> one who had written the work, if in fact she had? Did Albert buy
> Mileva's silence? Even if he had, was there more to hold Mileva back
> from exposing Albert, than the desperate need for monies?
>
> . . . Serbian women had little chance at fame in those days, other
> than as ornaments attached to their husbands' arms. Tesla, a Serb born
> in Croatia, was unfairly treated in the West. What chance did Mileva
> stand? Albert was cruel to Mileva. Her self-confidence may have been
> destroyed. Albert once demanded in writing that Mileva obey his cruel
> and degrading orders, in a letter which can only be described as
> shocking and revolting.327 If Mileva had hoped that Albert would someday
> acknowledge her, she was mistaken.
> http://womenshistory.about.com/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm?site=http://home.comcast.net/%7Extxinc/mileva.htm
|
|
