| |
Main
Date: 08 Nov 2006 16:38:29
From: THE MIN
Subject: Before The Fat Lady Sings...
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
WHILE LIBERALS are counting their chickens before they
hatch, I have several comments on Republican strategy
between now and the 2008 U.S. Presidential elections...
Although I did get it right in 2000, that Bush would
be elected but not by common election (even Liberals
agree that Bush was appointed, not elected, President).
And although I did get it right in 2004, that President
George W. Bush would be resoundingly *elected* President,
thus is why I wrote he would be (re)elected, all to wit:
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_q=&num=100&scoring=d&as_epq=Daniel+Joseph+Min&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_ugroup=&as_usubject=&as_uauthors=&lr=&as_drrb=q&as_qdr=&as_mind=1&as_minm=1&as_miny=1981&as_maxd=8&as_maxm=11&as_maxy=2006&safe=off
Notwithstanding, I obviously overestimated the American
public with regard to yesterday's blood bath against our
G.O.P.! The Republicans resolutely *SURRENDERED* control
over the Lower House of the U.S. Congress, but they are
hanging on by *one* seat in the Upper House (at least I
got that part exactly right).
Therefore, and with much regret, I must publicly confess
with all shame and humility that I was *WRONG* about the
House of Representatives. The significant majority of the
voting populace wants Pinko Liberals Dean, Pelosi, Reed,
Soros, Moore, Churchill, Sheehan, ad nauseam, to get one
last chance to drag America and the whole world down with
them on their way into the abyssal of chaos and Hellfire.
On the bright side, ballot initiatives defining marriage
as between one man and one woman passed in flying colors
in some States, leading me to believe that not every [D]-
voter is a hard-line, radical left-wing Liberal Atheist;
they will be disappointed to see the aforesaid's insane
Anti-American Anti-Christian agenda force Congress into
perpetual gridlock, while President Bush excercises his
Executive privilege, and his coup de maitre: Veto Power!
Also, with Republicans in control of the USSC, watch for
many of the formerly-Liberal USSC decisions to get shot
down in flames, and new Fair and Balanced decisions, like
ruling the popular theory of Intelligent Design, etc., to
be superimposed right over the top of the orthodox Atheist
theory of Evolution in all of America's public schools in
all 50 States bar none. That's definitely on the horizon.
Finally, I do look forward to the Congressional gridlock
further dividing the moral-majority Republicans from the
anarchistic/antichristic Liberal Atheistocrats--with MUCH
bellicosity and heretofore unheard of [D]ivisive rhetoric.
Yours In Humility,
Daniel Joseph Min
http://www.2hot2cool.com/11/danieljosephmin/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQA/AwUBRVIEY5ljD7YrHM/nEQLKJQCeLDygs7nN8j1LhGfddzMdHFGt1/oAoJF4
rm/yn8lo4M+yCzD1tmqiWm1i
=MVYN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
|
| |
Date: 08 Nov 2006 11:33:26
From: Midwinter
Subject: Re: Before The Fat Lady Sings...
|
THE MIN <anon@comments.header > wrote:
> (even Liberals
> agree that Bush was appointed, not elected, President).
I'm not sure exactly what you think a liberal is, but I'm pretty sure that
'liberals' would be the first to say that Bush wasn't elected in 2000.
That said, the incessant use of the word 'liberal' with pejorative intent
has really robbed it of any meaning at all. Like 'left-wing' and 'right-
wing', it really now means little more than "someone I hate because they
don't agree with me".
|
| |
Date: 08 Nov 2006 11:31:36
From: Mark K. Bilbo
Subject: Re: Before The Fat Lady Sings...
|
On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 16:38:29 +0000, THE MIN wrote:
> I was *WRONG*
Yes, you were.
--
Mark K. Bilbo
--------------------------------------------------
"...otherwise, we're looking at the potential
of this kind of world:.... a world in which
oil reserves are controlled by radicals in order
to extract blackmail from the West..." [George Bush]
Wait... oil reserves?
|
| | |
Date: 08 Nov 2006 16:33:07
From: Al Klein
Subject: Re: Before The Fat Lady Sings...
|
On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 11:31:36 -0600, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<gmail@com.mkbilbo > wrote:
>On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 16:38:29 +0000, THE MIN wrote:
>
>> I was *WRONG*
>
>Yes, you were.
Water is wet.
(Is this a contest to see who can post the most self-evident
statement?)
--
rukbat at optonline dot net
"If this were a dictatorship, it'd be a heck of a lot easier, just so
long as I'm the dictator."
- G W Bush (Washington, D.C., Dec. 19, 2000)
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
This signature was made by SigChanger.
You can find SigChanger at: http://www.phranc.nl/
|
| | | |
Date: 08 Nov 2006 15:52:03
From: Ghod
Subject: Re: Before The Fat Lady Sings...
|
"Al Klein" <rukbat@pern.invalid > wrote in message
news:a6j4l29mqe8oohl8241vucbmm4nilfgnoh@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 11:31:36 -0600, "Mark K. Bilbo"
> <gmail@com.mkbilbo> wrote:
>
> >On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 16:38:29 +0000, THE MIN wrote:
> >
> >> I was *WRONG*
> >
> >Yes, you were.
>
> Water is wet.
>
> (Is this a contest to see who can post the most self-evident
> statement?)
There is water at the bottom of the ocean.....
|
| | | | |
Date: 16 Nov 2006 00:38:01
From: Brian E. Clark
Subject: Re: Before The Fat Lady Sings...
|
In article <eitji3$4v7$1@news.ks.uiuc.edu >, Ghod said...
> > (Is this a contest to see who can post the most self-evident
> > statement?)
>
> There is water at the bottom of the ocean.....
Not so! There is sediment, rock, sand, magnesium nodules,
etc. at the bottom of the ocean. If you're still finding
water, you haven't reached the bottom yet. ;-)
--
-----------
Brian E. Clark
|
| |
Date: 08 Nov 2006 09:13:04
From: Sasha
Subject: Re: Before The Fat Lady Sings...
|
THE MIN wrote:
> Finally, I do look forward to the Congressional gridlock
> further dividing the moral-majority Republicans from the
> anarchistic/antichristic Liberal Atheistocrats--with MUCH
> bellicosity and heretofore unheard of [D]ivisive rhetoric.
Sounds like someone has their bitterpants on too tight.
|
| | |
Date: 08 Nov 2006 13:52:43
From: Ghod
Subject: Re: Before The Fat Lady Sings...
|
"Sasha" <scironi@gmail.com > wrote in message
news:1163005984.182640.111710@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
> THE MIN wrote:
> > Finally, I do look forward to the Congressional gridlock
> > further dividing the moral-majority Republicans from the
> > anarchistic/antichristic Liberal Atheistocrats--with MUCH
> > bellicosity and heretofore unheard of [D]ivisive rhetoric.
>
> Sounds like someone has their bitterpants on too tight.
"bitterpants"? That's a new one on me.....WTF does it mean? Googling
didn't help at all. Or did you mean "butterpants"?
|
| |
Date: 08 Nov 2006 17:12:13
From: Jim07D6
Subject: Re: Before The Fat Lady Sings...
|
THE MIN <anon@comments.header > said:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
>WHILE LIBERALS are counting their chickens before they
>hatch, I have several comments on Republican strategy
>between now and the 2008 U.S. Presidential elections...
>
>Although I did get it right in 2000, that Bush would
>be elected but not by common election (even Liberals
>agree that Bush was appointed, not elected, President).
>And although I did get it right in 2004, that President
>George W. Bush would be resoundingly *elected* President,
>thus is why I wrote he would be (re)elected, all to wit:
>
> http://groups.google.com/groups?as_q=&num=100&scoring=d&as_epq=Daniel+Joseph+Min&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_ugroup=&as_usubject=&as_uauthors=&lr=&as_drrb=q&as_qdr=&as_mind=1&as_minm=1&as_miny=1981&as_maxd=8&as_maxm=11&as_maxy=2006&safe=off
>
>Notwithstanding, I obviously overestimated the American
>public with regard to yesterday's blood bath against our
>G.O.P.! The Republicans resolutely *SURRENDERED* control
>over the Lower House of the U.S. Congress, but they are
>hanging on by *one* seat in the Upper House (at least I
>got that part exactly right).
It can be looked at another way -- the GOP is not what has engineered
the past 6 years, it is a coalition of individuals centered around
Rove and Cheney, who are lame ducks no matter what happens to
Congress. They used the mechanisms of the GOP and some of its
followers' by pandering as needed to their ideological commitments.
But the coalition members are happy, satisfied ducks. 6 years of
partisan control has the group's members sitting pretty. THey can
start letting go, and enjoys what they have set up for themselves,
just as there has to be a time when bank robbers say, "we've got
enough -- let's clear out!".
Oh, right, not all the robbers got out. Abramoff, Lay, etc. Oh well,
they were useful to the core group.
>
>Therefore, and with much regret, I must publicly confess
>with all shame and humility that I was *WRONG* about the
>House of Representatives. The significant majority of the
>voting populace wants Pinko Liberals Dean, Pelosi, Reed,
>Soros, Moore, Churchill, Sheehan, ad nauseam, to get one
>last chance to drag America and the whole world down with
>them on their way into the abyssal of chaos and Hellfire.
In actual fact, the Dem congress will be relatively centrist.
>
>On the bright side, ballot initiatives defining marriage
>as between one man and one woman passed in flying colors
>in some States, leading me to believe that not every [D]-
>voter is a hard-line, radical left-wing Liberal Atheist;
>they will be disappointed to see the aforesaid's insane
>Anti-American Anti-Christian agenda force Congress into
>perpetual gridlock, while President Bush excercises his
>Executive privilege, and his coup de maitre: Veto Power!
>
>Also, with Republicans in control of the USSC, watch for
>many of the formerly-Liberal USSC decisions to get shot
>down in flames, and new Fair and Balanced decisions, like
>ruling the popular theory of Intelligent Design, etc., to
>be superimposed right over the top of the orthodox Atheist
>theory of Evolution in all of America's public schools in
>all 50 States bar none. That's definitely on the horizon.
More predictions? Care to predict the year, and in which state this
lawsuit will begin?
Actually your predictions require stronger central government than the
GOP and a real conservative would claim to want. See how the GOP, and
you, have been duped?
>
>Finally, I do look forward to the Congressional gridlock
>further dividing the moral-majority Republicans from the
>anarchistic/antichristic Liberal Atheistocrats--with MUCH
>bellicosity and heretofore unheard of [D]ivisive rhetoric.
It should be interesting.
-- Jim07D6
|
| |
Date: 08 Nov 2006 10:59:40
From: 00:00:00Hg
Subject: Re: Before The Fat Lady Sings...
|
On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 16:38:29 +0000, THE MIN wrote:
> ad nauseam, to get one
> last chance to drag America and the whole world down with them on their
> way into the abyssal of chaos and Hellfire.
Ezekiel Chapter 38?
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Ezekiel+38-39
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
|
| | |
Date: 08 Nov 2006 10:08:52
From: Shawn
Subject: Re: Before The Fat Lady Sings...
|
00:00:00Hg wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 16:38:29 +0000, THE MIN wrote:
>
>> ad nauseam, to get one
>> last chance to drag America and the whole world down with them on their
>> way into the abyssal of chaos and Hellfire.
>
> Ezekiel Chapter 38?
>
> http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Ezekiel+38-39
Arthur Brown
|
| |
Date: 08 Nov 2006 23:21:56
From: raven1
Subject: Re: Before The Fat Lady Sings...
|
On 8 Nov 2006 16:38:29 -0000, THE MIN <anon@comments.header > wrote:
>Notwithstanding, I obviously overestimated the American
>public with regard to yesterday's blood bath against our
>G.O.P.!
By "our", presumably you mean the other inmates in your wing?
>The Republicans resolutely *SURRENDERED* control
>over the Lower House of the U.S. Congress, but they are
>hanging on by *one* seat in the Upper House (at least I
>got that part exactly right).
Wrong, Bitch. The Democrats took the Senate as well.
--
"O Sybilli, si ergo
Fortibus es in ero
O Nobili! Themis trux
Sivat sinem? Causen Dux"
|
| | |
Date: 08 Nov 2006 21:34:38
From: Bob Officer
Subject: Re: Before The Fat Lady Sings...
|
On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 23:21:56 -0500, in alt.astrology, raven1
<quoththeraven@nevermore.com > wrote:
>On 8 Nov 2006 16:38:29 -0000, THE MIN <anon@comments.header> wrote:
>
>>Notwithstanding, I obviously overestimated the American
>>public with regard to yesterday's blood bath against our
>>G.O.P.!
>
>By "our", presumably you mean the other inmates in your wing?
>
>>The Republicans resolutely *SURRENDERED* control
>>over the Lower House of the U.S. Congress, but they are
>>hanging on by *one* seat in the Upper House (at least I
>>got that part exactly right).
>
>Wrong, Bitch. The Democrats took the Senate as well.
This look like the Wraith of Kahn all over again...
<an utter and complete failure >
--
Ak'toh'di
|
| | | |
Date: 08 Nov 2006 23:39:16
From: Beep
Subject: Re: Before The Fat Lady Sings...
|
On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 21:34:38 -0800, Bob Officer
<bobofficers@127.0.0.7 > wrote:
>On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 23:21:56 -0500, in alt.astrology, raven1
><quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote:
>
>>On 8 Nov 2006 16:38:29 -0000, THE MIN <anon@comments.header> wrote:
>>
>>>Notwithstanding, I obviously overestimated the American
>>>public with regard to yesterday's blood bath against our
>>>G.O.P.!
>>
>>By "our", presumably you mean the other inmates in your wing?
>>
>>>The Republicans resolutely *SURRENDERED* control
>>>over the Lower House of the U.S. Congress, but they are
>>>hanging on by *one* seat in the Upper House (at least I
>>>got that part exactly right).
>>
>>Wrong, Bitch. The Democrats took the Senate as well.
>
>This look like the Wraith of Kahn all over again...
>
><an utter and complete failure>
Not the best day the to-the-right-of-Reagan folk ever had.
Oh well!
Great day for ME ;)
Cheers!
--
Email: xbeepx at yahoo dot com
Blog: http://beepbeep.livejournal.com
Sign the petition: http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/256624876
-- ίλλώ
|
| | | | |
Date: 09 Nov 2006 07:29:02
From: Widdershins
Subject: Re: Before The Fat Lady Sings...
|
Wed, 08 Nov 2006 23:39:16 -0800, Beep <spamnot@spamsux.net > licked
the point of a #2 Yellow Pencil, and wrote:
>On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 21:34:38 -0800, Bob Officer
><bobofficers@127.0.0.7> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 23:21:56 -0500, in alt.astrology, raven1
>><quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On 8 Nov 2006 16:38:29 -0000, THE MIN <anon@comments.header> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Notwithstanding, I obviously overestimated the American
>>>>public with regard to yesterday's blood bath against our
>>>>G.O.P.!
>>>
>>>By "our", presumably you mean the other inmates in your wing?
>>>
>>>>The Republicans resolutely *SURRENDERED* control
>>>>over the Lower House of the U.S. Congress, but they are
>>>>hanging on by *one* seat in the Upper House (at least I
>>>>got that part exactly right).
>>>
>>>Wrong, Bitch. The Democrats took the Senate as well.
>>
>>This look like the Wraith of Kahn all over again...
>>
>><an utter and complete failure>
>
>Not the best day the to-the-right-of-Reagan folk ever had.
>
>Oh well!
>
>Great day for ME ;)
>
>Cheers!
Maybe you can start getting sufficient medication again.
Hugs,
Widdy
It was all so different before everything changed.
|
| | | | | |
Date: 09 Nov 2006 12:54:00
From: Bob Officer
Subject: Re: Before The Fat Lady Sings...
|
On Thu, 09 Nov 2006 07:29:02 -0800, in alt.astrology, Widdershins
<sinistre@liripipe.com > wrote:
> Wed, 08 Nov 2006 23:39:16 -0800, Beep <spamnot@spamsux.net> licked
>the point of a #2 Yellow Pencil, and wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 21:34:38 -0800, Bob Officer
>><bobofficers@127.0.0.7> wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 23:21:56 -0500, in alt.astrology, raven1
>>><quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On 8 Nov 2006 16:38:29 -0000, THE MIN <anon@comments.header> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Notwithstanding, I obviously overestimated the American
>>>>>public with regard to yesterday's blood bath against our
>>>>>G.O.P.!
>>>>
>>>>By "our", presumably you mean the other inmates in your wing?
>>>>
>>>>>The Republicans resolutely *SURRENDERED* control
>>>>>over the Lower House of the U.S. Congress, but they are
>>>>>hanging on by *one* seat in the Upper House (at least I
>>>>>got that part exactly right).
>>>>
>>>>Wrong, Bitch. The Democrats took the Senate as well.
>>>
>>>This look like the Wraith of Kahn all over again...
>>>
>>><an utter and complete failure>
>>
>>Not the best day the to-the-right-of-Reagan folk ever had.
>>
>>Oh well!
>>
>>Great day for ME ;)
>>
>>Cheers!
>
>Maybe you can start getting sufficient medication again.
I hope so.
It was discovered shortly after the American revolution that The US
can not give freedom away. it has to be born internally, and grow as
a movement from within the national body. The US invasion of Canada
was a failure. The Us continued to relearn this lesson again and
again over the next 300+ years about very 30 years or so. The last
major lesson was the given to us in the rice paddy of SE Asia. This
lesson is current lesson is given to us in the Sands of Arabia. This
is a lesson we still have failed to learn from history.
Freedom can't be granted to another person, people or country. It
Must be earned. Ripped from the hands of the tyrants, by the people
that seek it.
The unlawful actions of invading and removing a properly installed
government of another country was immoral and unethical. This ill
thought out plan, was created and conducted by a government headed
run by an idiot.
--
Ak'toh'di
|
| |
Date: 08 Nov 2006 20:21:11
From: Flash Bazbo
Subject: Re: Before The Fat Lady Sings...
|
On 8 Nov 2006 16:38:29 -0000, THE MIN <anon@comments.header > wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
>WHILE LIBERALS are counting their chickens before they
>hatch, I have several comments on Republican strategy
>between now and the 2008 U.S. Presidential elections...
>
>Although I did get it right in 2000, that Bush would
>be elected but not by common election (even Liberals
>agree that Bush was appointed, not elected, President).
>And although I did get it right in 2004, that President
>George W. Bush would be resoundingly *elected* President,
>thus is why I wrote he would be (re)elected, all to wit:
You are ignoring your earlier prediction that Clinton would be the
*last* elected president, and that Clinton would declare martial law
at the end of his term to remain in power. Funny how that worked out,
huh?
>
> http://groups.google.com/groups?as_q=&num=100&scoring=d&as_epq=Daniel+Joseph+Min&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_ugroup=&as_usubject=&as_uauthors=&lr=&as_drrb=q&as_qdr=&as_mind=1&as_minm=1&as_miny=1981&as_maxd=8&as_maxm=11&as_maxy=2006&safe=off
>
>Notwithstanding, I obviously overestimated the American
>public with regard to yesterday's blood bath against our
>G.O.P.! The Republicans resolutely *SURRENDERED* control
>over the Lower House of the U.S. Congress, but they are
>hanging on by *one* seat in the Upper House (at least I
>got that part exactly right).
One race is still undecided. Now who is counting chickens?
>
>Therefore, and with much regret, I must publicly confess
>with all shame and humility that I was *WRONG* about the
>House of Representatives. The significant majority of the
>voting populace wants Pinko Liberals Dean, Pelosi, Reed,
>Soros, Moore, Churchill, Sheehan, ad nauseam, to get one
>last chance to drag America and the whole world down with
>them on their way into the abyssal of chaos and Hellfire.
>
>On the bright side, ballot initiatives defining marriage
>as between one man and one woman passed in flying colors
>in some States, leading me to believe that not every [D]-
>voter is a hard-line, radical left-wing Liberal Atheist;
>they will be disappointed to see the aforesaid's insane
>Anti-American Anti-Christian agenda force Congress into
>perpetual gridlock, while President Bush excercises his
>Executive privilege, and his coup de maitre: Veto Power!
Does Bush even know he has a veto power?
>
>Yours In Humility,
That'll be the day.
>Daniel Joseph Min
>http://www.2hot2cool.com/11/danieljosephmin/
>
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>iQA/AwUBRVIEY5ljD7YrHM/nEQLKJQCeLDygs7nN8j1LhGfddzMdHFGt1/oAoJF4
>rm/yn8lo4M+yCzD1tmqiWm1i
>=MVYN
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
| |
Date: 08 Nov 2006 12:11:37
From: Patrick Edward Murray
Subject: Re: Before The Fat Lady Sings...
|
Min,
Why don't you find somewhere else to play?
Clearly, if you have not noticed your heroic Neo Cons
have LOST!
Please do drop in from time to time with Real Astronomical
Observations:)
Not any phony baloney musings of a poor Astrologer!
|
| |
Date: 08 Nov 2006 15:10:34
From: GoDrex
Subject: Re: Before The Fat Lady Sings...
|
"THE MIN" <anon@comments.header > wrote in message
news:W5XW5DCR39029.4850578704@twistycreek.com...
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
, but they are
> hanging on by *one* seat in the Upper House (at least I
> got that part exactly right).
>
> Therefore, and with much regret, I must publicly confess
> with all shame and humility that I was *WRONG* about the
> House of Representatives.
you're about to be wrong about the senate too ASSHOLE
your buddy Macaca is going to lose.
|
| |
Date: 08 Nov 2006 20:00:53
From: torresD
Subject: Re: Before The Fat Lady Sings...
|
http://www.wrmea.com/
|
| |
Date: 08 Nov 2006 13:41:00
From: Ghod
Subject: Re: Before The Fat Lady Sings...
|
"THE MIN" <anon@comments.header > wrote in message
news:W5XW5DCR39029.4850578704@twistycreek.com...
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> WHILE LIBERALS are counting their chickens before they
> hatch, I have several comments on Republican strategy
> between now and the 2008 U.S. Presidential elections...
Who the fuck cares, Dummy Boy?
> Although I did get it right in 2000, that Bush would
> be elected but not by common election (even Liberals
> agree that Bush was appointed, not elected, President).
"even Liberals"? Talk about ass backward!
[crap]
> Notwithstanding, I obviously overestimated the American
> public with regard to yesterday's blood bath against our
> G.O.P.! The Republicans resolutely *SURRENDERED* control
> over the Lower House of the U.S. Congress,
Uh-huh.....right. You're trying to claim that they didn't get their
asses handed to them, in spite of all their dirty tricks. Idiot.
> but they are
> hanging on by *one* seat in the Upper House (at least I
> got that part exactly right).
Speaking of counting chickens.......
> Therefore, and with much regret, I must publicly confess
> with all shame and humility that I was *WRONG* about the
> House of Representatives.
The Minconpoop admits to being wrong? Is this a forgery?
[crap]
> leading me to believe that not every [D]-
> voter is a hard-line, radical left-wing Liberal Atheist;
At the rate he's learning, he'll have learned to tie his own shoes by
the time he dies, assuming he lives to be two or three hundred years
old.
> Also, with Republicans in control of the USSC, watch for
> many of the formerly-Liberal USSC decisions to get shot
> down in flames, and new Fair and Balanced decisions, like
You don't really know how it works, do you?
> ruling the popular theory of Intelligent Design, etc., to
Popular? ID, POPULAR? Only among retarded cretins like you......
> be superimposed right over the top of the orthodox Atheist
> theory of Evolution in all of America's public schools in
> all 50 States bar none. That's definitely on the horizon.
"orthodox Atheist theory of Evolution".....you're almost funny,
shithead.
> Finally, I do look forward to the Congressional gridlock
> further dividing the moral-majority Republicans from the
> anarchistic/antichristic Liberal Atheistocrats--with MUCH
> bellicosity and heretofore unheard of [D]ivisive rhetoric.
Ah, I see it all so clearly now.....you're an enemy of the U.S., and
you couldn't have made it any clearer.
> Yours In Humidity,
Corrected your spelling for you, son. Someday, you will no longer be
wet behind the ears.
> Daniel Joseph Min
|
| | |
Date: 08 Nov 2006 12:37:31
From: Starlord
Subject: Re: Before The Fat Lady Sings...
|
I wish two things:
1. Don't requote all of his garbage.
2. Remove SAA from the cross posting list.
--
The Lone Sidewalk Astronomer of Rosamond
Telescope Buyers FAQ
http://home.inreach.com/starlord
Sidewalk Astronomy
www.sidewalkastronomy.info
The Church of Eternity
http://home.inreach.com/starlord/church/Eternity.html
"Ghod" <ghod@ameritech.net > wrote in message
news:eitbsc$2du$1@news.ks.uiuc.edu...
|
| | | |
Date: 08 Nov 2006 14:51:24
From: Ghod
Subject: Re: Before The Fat Lady Sings...
|
"Starlord" <starlord@sidewalkastronomy.info > wrote in message
news:39qdnZR0G59f3c_YnZ2dnUVZ_uidnZ2d@inreach.com...
> I wish two things:
If wishes were horses.....
> 1. Don't requote all of his garbage.
Look again, I didn't.
> 2. Remove SAA from the cross posting list.
*WAAAAAAAAAAAH!!!* If you didn't want to continue the thread in your
fav ng, you shoulda trimmed it yourself, when you posted this
foolishness.
|
|
