| |
Main
Date: 06 Sep 2007 03:56:19
From: oriel36
Subject: Isolating axial rotation
|
To isolate axial rotation from Keplerian variations in orbital motion
is an extraoridinarlly difficult thing to do even with modern
technology.The determination is important insofar as there is a
correlation between variations in orbital geometry in affecting long
term climatological cycles such as 'ice ages' and present methods
simply ignore orbital motion altogether.
Nobody appears to ask where variations in orbital motion over the
course of an annual orbit show up in the determination of axial
rotation by tying it directly to zodiacal geometry or rather
determining that axial rotation can be extracted as a mean from
gauging the return of a star in 23 hours 56 minutes 04 seconds as the
IERS does.
http://www.iers.org/MainDisp.csl?pid=101-189
Again,isolating axial rotation is an enormous task and it requires
immediate attention insofar as it is crucial for determining if there
are natural variations in orbital geometry occuring for climatological
purposes.To treat axial rotation as an isolated motion the way it is
being currently done is highly counter-productive.
|
|
| |
Date: 16 Sep 2007 16:03:02
From: Quadibloc
Subject: Re: Isolating axial rotation
|
kokomo wrote:
> What is a Quadibloc??
QUADIBLOC stands for QUick And Dirty Implementable BLOck Cipher.
http://www.quadibloc.com/crypto/co0407.htm
John Savard
|
| |
Date: 15 Sep 2007 20:07:46
From: Quadibloc
Subject: Re: Isolating axial rotation
|
oriel36 wrote:
> To isolate axial rotation from Keplerian variations in orbital motion
> is an extraoridinarlly difficult thing to do even with modern
> technology.
It may be difficult for you, because you make it difficult for
yourself by choosing to ignore the starry background of the sky which
makes it obvious where orbital motion ends and axial rotation begins,
dismissing it as mere "astrological geometry".
John Savard
|
| | |
Date: 16 Sep 2007 18:12:33
From: kokomo
Subject: Re: Isolating axial rotation
|
What is a Quadibloc??
>
> It may be difficult for you, because you make it difficult for
> yourself by choosing to ignore the starry background of the sky which
> makes it obvious where orbital motion ends and axial rotation begins,
> dismissing it as mere "astrological geometry".
>
> John Savard
>
|
|
