| |
Main
Date: 13 Jun 2007 10:18:16
From: Pete Lawrence
Subject: 13 days of AR10960 (part 1)
|
Hi all,
Here's a sequence of 13 calcium-K shots of AR10960 as it crossed the
Sun's disk from June 1st to June 13th.
A full disk sequence is also under preparation but as this consists of
13x 6-frame full disk mosaics it may take a while!
http://www.digitalsky.org.uk/solar/2007/CaK/2007-06-01_to_12_Calcium-K_1024.jpg
--
Pete
http://www.digitalsky.org.uk
|
|
| |
Date: 14 Jun 2007 00:58:42
From: Roger
Subject: Re: 13 days of AR10960 (part 1)
|
wow!
Pete Lawrence wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Here's a sequence of 13 calcium-K shots of AR10960 as it crossed the
> Sun's disk from June 1st to June 13th.
>
> A full disk sequence is also under preparation but as this consists of
> 13x 6-frame full disk mosaics it may take a while!
>
> http://www.digitalsky.org.uk/solar/2007/CaK/2007-06-01_to_12_Calcium-K_1024.jpg
>
> --
> Pete
> http://www.digitalsky.org.uk
|
| |
Date: 13 Jun 2007 10:58:00
From: Ben
Subject: Re: 13 days of AR10960 (part 1)
|
Splendid sequence, Pete!
Ben
|
| |
Date: 13 Jun 2007 14:07:25
From: Sam Wormley
Subject: Re: 13 days of AR10960 (part 1)
|
Pete Lawrence wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Here's a sequence of 13 calcium-K shots of AR10960 as it crossed the
> Sun's disk from June 1st to June 13th.
>
> A full disk sequence is also under preparation but as this consists of
> 13x 6-frame full disk mosaics it may take a while!
>
> http://www.digitalsky.org.uk/solar/2007/CaK/2007-06-01_to_12_Calcium-K_1024.jpg
>
Excellent!
|
| |
Date: 13 Jun 2007 15:12:30
From: Anthony Ayiomamitis
Subject: Re: 13 days of AR10960 (part 1)
|
Pete Lawrence wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Here's a sequence of 13 calcium-K shots of AR10960 as it crossed the
> Sun's disk from June 1st to June 13th.
>
> A full disk sequence is also under preparation but as this consists of
> 13x 6-frame full disk mosaics it may take a while!
>
> http://www.digitalsky.org.uk/solar/2007/CaK/2007-06-01_to_12_Calcium-K_1024.jpg
>
Hi Pete,
Excellent images and sequence. Please keep 'em coming!
Anthony.
|
| | |
Date: 13 Jun 2007 13:24:14
From: Jim
Subject: Re: 13 days of AR10960 (part 1)
|
In article <f4on0r$rva$1@mouse.otenet.gr >, Anthony Ayiomamitis wrote:
> Pete Lawrence wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Here's a sequence of 13 calcium-K shots of AR10960 as it crossed the
>> Sun's disk from June 1st to June 13th.
>>
>> A full disk sequence is also under preparation but as this consists of
>> 13x 6-frame full disk mosaics it may take a while!
>>
>> http://www.digitalsky.org.uk/solar/2007/CaK/2007-06-01_to_12_Calcium-K_1024.jpg
>>
>
> Hi Pete,
>
> Excellent images and sequence. Please keep 'em coming!
Even though it reveals a very Heliocentric view of things? <evil grin >
Ok, sorry, I'll be good now.
Nice one Pete.
Jim
--
Find me at http://www.ursaMinorBeta.co.uk
"Inspiring bold John Barleycorn! What dangers thou canst make us scorn!
Wi' tippenny, we fear nae evil; Wi' usquabae, we'll face the devil!"
- Robert Burns, "Tam O'Shanter"
|
| | | |
Date: 13 Jun 2007 13:46:38
From: Pete Lawrence
Subject: Re: 13 days of AR10960 (part 1)
|
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 13:24:14 +0100, Jim <jim@magrathea.plus.com >
wrote:
>In article <f4on0r$rva$1@mouse.otenet.gr>, Anthony Ayiomamitis wrote:
>> Pete Lawrence wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Here's a sequence of 13 calcium-K shots of AR10960 as it crossed the
>>> Sun's disk from June 1st to June 13th.
>>>
>>> A full disk sequence is also under preparation but as this consists of
>>> 13x 6-frame full disk mosaics it may take a while!
>>>
>>> http://www.digitalsky.org.uk/solar/2007/CaK/2007-06-01_to_12_Calcium-K_1024.jpg
>>>
>>
>> Hi Pete,
>>
>> Excellent images and sequence. Please keep 'em coming!
>
>Even though it reveals a very Heliocentric view of things? <evil grin>
>
>Ok, sorry, I'll be good now.
>
>Nice one Pete.
Right - you deserve this...
It may make you feel sick so be warned...
http://www.digitalsky.org.uk/solar/2007/CaK/2007-06-01_to_12_anim3.gif
--
Pete
http://www.digitalsky.org.uk
|
| | | | |
Date: 13 Jun 2007 13:56:20
From: Jim
Subject: Re: 13 days of AR10960 (part 1)
|
In article <8opv63957749svrso554r8k4490ub43085@4ax.com >, Pete Lawrence wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Here's a sequence of 13 calcium-K shots of AR10960 as it crossed the
>>>> Sun's disk from June 1st to June 13th.
>>>>
>>>> A full disk sequence is also under preparation but as this consists of
>>>> 13x 6-frame full disk mosaics it may take a while!
>>>>
>>>> http://www.digitalsky.org.uk/solar/2007/CaK/2007-06-01_to_12_Calcium-K_1024.jpg
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Pete,
>>>
>>> Excellent images and sequence. Please keep 'em coming!
>>
>>Even though it reveals a very Heliocentric view of things? <evil grin>
>>
>>Ok, sorry, I'll be good now.
>>
>>Nice one Pete.
>
> Right - you deserve this...
>
> It may make you feel sick so be warned...
>
> http://www.digitalsky.org.uk/solar/2007/CaK/2007-06-01_to_12_anim3.gif
Oh, now *that's* flash. Well done that man!
Jim
--
Find me at http://www.ursaMinorBeta.co.uk
"Inspiring bold John Barleycorn! What dangers thou canst make us scorn!
Wi' tippenny, we fear nae evil; Wi' usquabae, we'll face the devil!"
- Robert Burns, "Tam O'Shanter"
|
| | | | | |
Date: 13 Jun 2007 15:13:13
From: Mark Ayliffe
Subject: Re: 13 days of AR10960 (part 1)
|
On or about 2007-06-13,
Jim <jim@magrathea.plus.com > illuminated us with:
> In article <8opv63957749svrso554r8k4490ub43085@4ax.com>, Pete Lawrence wrote:
>>
>> Right - you deserve this...
>>
>> It may make you feel sick so be warned...
>>
>> http://www.digitalsky.org.uk/solar/2007/CaK/2007-06-01_to_12_anim3.gif
>
> Oh, now *that's* flash. Well done that man!
No, it's an animated GIF, but that's not important right now. I'll get
my coat.
Good work Pete (of course), but the animation is a bit quick.
Presumably that's a side effect of using the animated GIF concept?
--
Mark
Real email address
|
| | | | | | |
Date: 13 Jun 2007 16:53:23
From: Pete Lawrence
Subject: Re: 13 days of AR10960 (part 1)
|
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 15:13:13 GMT, Mark Ayliffe <me@privacy.net > wrote:
>On or about 2007-06-13,
>Jim <jim@magrathea.plus.com> illuminated us with:
>> In article <8opv63957749svrso554r8k4490ub43085@4ax.com>, Pete Lawrence wrote:
>>>
>>> Right - you deserve this...
>>>
>>> It may make you feel sick so be warned...
>>>
>>> http://www.digitalsky.org.uk/solar/2007/CaK/2007-06-01_to_12_anim3.gif
>>
>> Oh, now *that's* flash. Well done that man!
>
>No, it's an animated GIF, but that's not important right now. I'll get
>my coat.
>
>Good work Pete (of course), but the animation is a bit quick.
>Presumably that's a side effect of using the animated GIF concept?
Try this one Mark. I've increased the interframe delay by 3x.
http://www.digitalsky.org.uk/solar/2007/CaK/2007-06-01_to_12_anim3a.gif
--
Pete
http://www.digitalsky.org.uk
|
| | | | | | | |
Date: 14 Jun 2007 08:10:52
From: Mark Ayliffe
Subject: Re: 13 days of AR10960 (part 1)
|
On or about 2007-06-13,
Pete Lawrence <pete.lawrence.nospam@pbl33.co.uk > illuminated us with:
> On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 15:13:13 GMT, Mark Ayliffe <me@privacy.net> wrote:
>
>>On or about 2007-06-13,
>>Jim <jim@magrathea.plus.com> illuminated us with:
>>> In article <8opv63957749svrso554r8k4490ub43085@4ax.com>, Pete Lawrence wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Right - you deserve this...
>>>>
>>>> It may make you feel sick so be warned...
>>>>
>>>> http://www.digitalsky.org.uk/solar/2007/CaK/2007-06-01_to_12_anim3.gif
>>>
>>> Oh, now *that's* flash. Well done that man!
>>
>>No, it's an animated GIF, but that's not important right now. I'll get
>>my coat.
>>
>>Good work Pete (of course), but the animation is a bit quick.
>>Presumably that's a side effect of using the animated GIF concept?
>
> Try this one Mark. I've increased the interframe delay by 3x.
>
> http://www.digitalsky.org.uk/solar/2007/CaK/2007-06-01_to_12_anim3a.gif
Hmm, it's a "having cake & eating it" problem, isn't it? That one is
too jerky really, while the first one is lovely & smooth, if a bit
short.
I guess you'll just have to take more pictures :-)) (I can't begin to
imagine how much time & effort this lot must have taken, lots I expect)
Is the variation in the density of the lighter parts due to variations
in atmospheric conditions or an inherent change in the structure
itself? I'd guess at the latter given the evolving shape, but it's
hard to be certain for one of such limited experience as me.
--
Mark
Real email address
|
| | | | | | | | |
Date: 14 Jun 2007 01:26:32
From: Brian Tung
Subject: Re: 13 days of AR10960 (part 1)
|
Mark Ayliffe wrote:
> I guess you'll just have to take more pictures :-)) (I can't begin to
> imagine how much time & effort this lot must have taken, lots I expect)
Really Pete. When are you going to get around to digging that hole
through the Earth so you can take pictures of the Sun at night? :)
--
Brian Tung <brian@isi.edu >
The Astronomy Corner at http://astro.isi.edu/
Unofficial C5+ Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/c5plus/
The PleiadAtlas Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/pleiadatlas/
My Own Personal FAQ (SAA) at http://astro.isi.edu/reference/faq.html
|
| | | | | | | | | |
Date: 14 Jun 2007 10:34:43
From: Ray Bellis
Subject: Re: 13 days of AR10960 (part 1)
|
Brian Tung wrote:
> Really Pete. When are you going to get around to digging
> that hole through the Earth so you can take pictures of
> the Sun at night? :)
No, let's just send him to the Arctic Circle :)
Ray
|
| | | | | | |
Date: 13 Jun 2007 08:09:56
From: Brian Tung
Subject: Re: 13 days of AR10960 (part 1)
|
Mark Ayliffe wrote:
> No, it's an animated GIF, but that's not important right now. I'll get
> my coat.
>
> Good work Pete (of course), but the animation is a bit quick.
> Presumably that's a side effect of using the animated GIF concept?
It could be, but each interframe delay is individually configurable (by
the image creator). That's the image format; whether the program Pete's
using permits it is another question.
--
Brian Tung <brian@isi.edu >
The Astronomy Corner at http://astro.isi.edu/
Unofficial C5+ Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/c5plus/
The PleiadAtlas Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/pleiadatlas/
My Own Personal FAQ (SAA) at http://astro.isi.edu/reference/faq.html
|
|
