| |
Main
Date: 27 Jun 2007 02:16:16
From: mitch
Subject: 10.7 cm microwave solar flux
|
I wonder if a regular satellite dish would work to monitor solar
flux if it were possible?
|
|
| |
Date: 27 Jun 2007 09:47:24
From: laura halliday
Subject: Re: 10.7 cm microwave solar flux
|
On Jun 27, 3:21 pm, "mitch" <m...@nospam.net > wrote:
> "laura halliday" <marsga...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1182917824.710484.257650@m37g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
>
> > On Jun 26, 7:16 pm, "mitch" <m...@nospam.net> wrote:
> >> I wonder if a regular satellite dish would work to monitor solar
> >> flux if it were possible?
>
> > Of course it's possible. You want one of the big C band
> > dishes for the best results.
>
> According to thishttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C_band you are not quite
> right.
> The C-band does not include 10.7 Ghz
I said C band *dish*. I said nothing about the toys at the focus.
Sheesh.
If you had a clue you would start with 4 GHz anyway, since
it's bound to tell you something, and the dish will likely
come with C band RF gear.
Laura Halliday VE7LDH "Que les nuages soient notre
Grid: CN89mg pied a terre..."
ICBM: 49 16.05 N 122 56.92 W - Hospital/Shafte
|
| |
Date: 26 Jun 2007 21:17:04
From: laura halliday
Subject: Re: 10.7 cm microwave solar flux
|
On Jun 26, 7:16 pm, "mitch" <m...@nospam.net > wrote:
> I wonder if a regular satellite dish would work to monitor solar
> flux if it were possible?
Of course it's possible. You want one of the big C band
dishes for the best results.
Laura Halliday VE7LDH "Que les nuages soient notre
Grid: CN89mg pied a terre..."
ICBM: 49 16.05 N 122 56.92 W - Hospital/Shafte
|
| | |
Date: 27 Jun 2007 15:21:39
From: mitch
Subject: Re: 10.7 cm microwave solar flux
|
"laura halliday" <marsgal42@hotmail.com > wrote in message
news:1182917824.710484.257650@m37g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
> On Jun 26, 7:16 pm, "mitch" <m...@nospam.net> wrote:
>> I wonder if a regular satellite dish would work to monitor solar
>> flux if it were possible?
>
> Of course it's possible. You want one of the big C band
> dishes for the best results.
According to this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C_band you are not quite
right.
The C-band does not include 10.7 Ghz
|
| | | |
Date: 27 Jun 2007 16:47:07
From: Andrew Smallshaw
Subject: Re: 10.7 cm microwave solar flux
|
On 2007-06-27, mitch <mitch@nospam.net > wrote:
> According to this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C_band you are not quite
> right.
> The C-band does not include 10.7 Ghz
First make your mind up. What frequency are you paricularly
interested in? 2.8 GHz (10.7 cm as initally quoted) or 10.7 GHz?
--
Andrew Smallshaw
andrews@sdf.lonestar.org
|
| | | | |
Date: 27 Jun 2007 17:59:56
From: mitch
Subject: Re: 10.7 cm microwave solar flux
|
"Andrew Smallshaw" <andrews@sdf.lonestar.org > wrote in message
news:slrnf8553s.b0d.andrews@sdf.lonestar.org...
> On 2007-06-27, mitch <mitch@nospam.net> wrote:
>
>> According to this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C_band you are not quite
>> right.
>> The C-band does not include 10.7 Ghz
>
> First make your mind up. What frequency are you paricularly
> interested in? 2.8 GHz (10.7 cm as initally quoted) or 10.7 GHz?
>
Ooops..yes...2.8 - 4 Ghz...my math is off...
|
| | | | |
Date: 27 Jun 2007 17:12:25
From: mitch
Subject: Re: 10.7 cm microwave solar flux
|
"Andrew Smallshaw" <andrews@sdf.lonestar.org > wrote in message
news:slrnf8553s.b0d.andrews@sdf.lonestar.org...
> On 2007-06-27, mitch <mitch@nospam.net> wrote:
>
>> According to this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C_band you are not quite
>> right.
>> The C-band does not include 10.7 Ghz
>
> First make your mind up. What frequency are you paricularly
> interested in? 2.8 GHz (10.7 cm as initally quoted) or 10.7 GHz?
>
Dude...10.7 GHz is 10.7 cm
v= c/wavelength so 300,000,000 meters/sec / .1 m = 3 Ghz
|
| | | | | |
Date: 28 Jun 2007 00:21:34
From: KLM
Subject: Re: 10.7 cm microwave solar flux
|
mitch wrote:
> "Andrew Smallshaw" <andrews@sdf.lonestar.org> wrote in message
> news:slrnf8553s.b0d.andrews@sdf.lonestar.org...
> > On 2007-06-27, mitch <mitch@nospam.net> wrote:
> >
> >> According to this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C_band you are not quite
> >> right.
> >> The C-band does not include 10.7 Ghz
> >
> > First make your mind up. What frequency are you paricularly
> > interested in? 2.8 GHz (10.7 cm as initally quoted) or 10.7 GHz?
> >
>
> Dude...10.7 GHz is 10.7 cm
>
> v= c/wavelength so 300,000,000 meters/sec / .1 m = 3 Ghz
Better run that through your 4x Powermate ??
|
|
